Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
M
MariaDB
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
nexedi
MariaDB
Commits
69dcc5b4
Commit
69dcc5b4
authored
Nov 10, 2004
by
unknown
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
WL#1972 "Evaluate HAVING before SELECT select-list"
- post-review changes sql/item.cc: - more/improved comments
parent
afbb5d8f
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
65 additions
and
21 deletions
+65
-21
sql/item.cc
sql/item.cc
+65
-21
No files found.
sql/item.cc
View file @
69dcc5b4
...
...
@@ -1564,7 +1564,8 @@ resolve_ref_in_select_and_group(THD *thd, Item_ident *ref, SELECT_LEX *select)
{
if
(
select_ref
!=
not_found_item
&&
!
ambiguous_fields
)
{
if
(
*
select_ref
&&
!
(
*
select_ref
)
->
fixed
)
DBUG_ASSERT
(
*
select_ref
);
if
(
!
(
*
select_ref
)
->
fixed
)
{
my_error
(
ER_ILLEGAL_REFERENCE
,
MYF
(
0
),
ref
->
name
,
"forward reference in item list"
);
...
...
@@ -1582,6 +1583,58 @@ resolve_ref_in_select_and_group(THD *thd, Item_ident *ref, SELECT_LEX *select)
}
/*
Resolve the name of a column reference.
SYNOPSIS
Item_field::fix_fields()
thd [in] current thread
tables [in] the tables in a FROM clause
reference [in/out] view column if this item was resolved to a view column
DESCRIPTION
The method resolves the column reference represented by 'this' as a column
present in one of: FROM clause, SELECT clause, GROUP BY clause of a query
Q, or in outer queries that contain Q.
NOTES
The name resolution algorithm used is (where [T_j] is an optional table
name that qualifies the column name):
resolve_column_reference([T_j].col_ref_i)
{
search for a column or derived column named col_ref_i
[in table T_j] in the FROM clause of Q;
if such a column is NOT found AND // Lookup in outer queries.
there are outer queries
{
for each outer query Q_k beginning from the inner-most one
{
if - Q_k is not a group query AND
- Q_k is not inside an aggregate function
OR
- Q_(k-1) is not in a HAVING or SELECT clause of Q_k
{
search for a column or derived column named col_ref_i
[in table T_j] in the FROM clause of Q_k;
}
if such a column is not found
Search for a column or derived column named col_ref_i
[in table T_j] in the SELECT and GROUP clauses of Q_k.
}
}
}
Notice that compared to Item_ref::fix_fields, here we first search the FROM
clause, and then we search the SELECT and GROUP BY clauses.
RETURN
TRUE if error
FALSE on success
*/
bool
Item_field
::
fix_fields
(
THD
*
thd
,
TABLE_LIST
*
tables
,
Item
**
reference
)
{
DBUG_ASSERT
(
fixed
==
0
);
...
...
@@ -1672,10 +1725,6 @@ bool Item_field::fix_fields(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tables, Item **reference)
if
(
ref
!=
not_found_item
)
{
DBUG_ASSERT
(
*
ref
&&
(
*
ref
)
->
fixed
);
/*
Avoid crash in case of error.
TODO: what does this comment mean?
*/
prev_subselect_item
->
used_tables_cache
|=
(
*
ref
)
->
used_tables
();
prev_subselect_item
->
const_item_cache
&=
(
*
ref
)
->
const_item
();
break
;
...
...
@@ -1699,7 +1748,7 @@ bool Item_field::fix_fields(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tables, Item **reference)
{
if
(
upward_lookup
)
{
// We can't say exactly what absen
d
table or field
// We can't say exactly what absen
t
table or field
my_printf_error
(
ER_BAD_FIELD_ERROR
,
ER
(
ER_BAD_FIELD_ERROR
),
MYF
(
0
),
full_name
(),
thd
->
where
);
}
...
...
@@ -2460,12 +2509,12 @@ bool Item_field::send(Protocol *protocol, String *buffer)
/*
Resolve the name of a column reference.
Resolve the name of a
reference to a
column reference.
SYNOPSIS
Item_ref::fix_fields()
thd [in] current thread
tables [in] the tables in
the
FROM clause
tables [in] the tables in
a
FROM clause
reference [in/out] view column if this item was resolved to a view column
DESCRIPTION
...
...
@@ -2475,7 +2524,8 @@ bool Item_field::send(Protocol *protocol, String *buffer)
aggregate functions.
NOTES
The name resolution algorithm used is:
The name resolution algorithm used is (where [T_j] is an optional table
name that qualifies the column name):
resolve_extended([T_j].col_ref_i)
{
...
...
@@ -2504,7 +2554,9 @@ bool Item_field::send(Protocol *protocol, String *buffer)
}
This procedure treats GROUP BY and SELECT clauses as one namespace for
column references in HAVING.
column references in HAVING. Notice that compared to
Item_field::fix_fields, here we first search the SELECT and GROUP BY
clauses, and then we search the FROM clause.
RETURN
TRUE if error
...
...
@@ -2559,10 +2611,6 @@ bool Item_ref::fix_fields(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tables, Item **reference)
if
(
ref
!=
not_found_item
)
{
DBUG_ASSERT
(
*
ref
&&
(
*
ref
)
->
fixed
);
/*
Avoid crash in case of error.
TODO: what does this comment mean?
*/
prev_subselect_item
->
used_tables_cache
|=
(
*
ref
)
->
used_tables
();
prev_subselect_item
->
const_item_cache
&=
(
*
ref
)
->
const_item
();
break
;
...
...
@@ -2675,13 +2723,9 @@ bool Item_ref::fix_fields(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tables, Item **reference)
}
/*
The following conditional is changed as to correctly identify
incorrect references in group functions or forward references
with sub-select's / derived tables, while it prevents this
check when Item_ref is created in an expression involving
summing function, which is to be placed in the user variable.
TODO: this comment is impossible to understand.
Check if this is an incorrect reference in a group function or forward
reference. Do not issue an error if this is an unnamed reference inside an
aggregate function.
*/
if
(((
*
ref
)
->
with_sum_func
&&
name
&&
(
depended_from
||
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment