Commit 75930fd5 authored by Marko Mäkelä's avatar Marko Mäkelä

Merge Bug#55626 fix from mysql-5.1-innodb:

revno: 3545
revision-id: marko.makela@oracle.com-20100818110110-zfs0i1vfrccfb4yw
parent: vasil.dimov@oracle.com-20100817193934-1yl7zz2odikxauf8
committer: Marko Mäkelä <marko.makela@oracle.com>
branch nick: 5.1-innodb
timestamp: Wed 2010-08-18 14:01:10 +0300
message:
  Bug#55626: MIN and MAX reading a delete-marked record from secondary index

  Remove a bogus debug assertion that triggered the bug.
  Add assertions precisely where records must not be delete-marked.
  And a comment to clarify when the record is allowed to be delete-marked.
parent 02492ae3
...@@ -2682,7 +2682,6 @@ row_sel_store_mysql_rec( ...@@ -2682,7 +2682,6 @@ row_sel_store_mysql_rec(
ut_ad(prebuilt->mysql_template); ut_ad(prebuilt->mysql_template);
ut_ad(prebuilt->default_rec); ut_ad(prebuilt->default_rec);
ut_ad(rec_offs_validate(rec, NULL, offsets)); ut_ad(rec_offs_validate(rec, NULL, offsets));
ut_ad(!rec_get_deleted_flag(rec, rec_offs_comp(offsets)));
if (UNIV_LIKELY_NULL(prebuilt->blob_heap)) { if (UNIV_LIKELY_NULL(prebuilt->blob_heap)) {
mem_heap_free(prebuilt->blob_heap); mem_heap_free(prebuilt->blob_heap);
...@@ -3603,6 +3602,7 @@ row_search_for_mysql( ...@@ -3603,6 +3602,7 @@ row_search_for_mysql(
row_sel_try_search_shortcut_for_mysql(). row_sel_try_search_shortcut_for_mysql().
The latch will not be released until The latch will not be released until
mtr_commit(&mtr). */ mtr_commit(&mtr). */
ut_ad(!rec_get_deleted_flag(rec, comp));
if (!row_sel_store_mysql_rec(buf, prebuilt, if (!row_sel_store_mysql_rec(buf, prebuilt,
rec, offsets)) { rec, offsets)) {
...@@ -4230,7 +4230,7 @@ row_search_for_mysql( ...@@ -4230,7 +4230,7 @@ row_search_for_mysql(
rec = old_vers; rec = old_vers;
} }
} else if (!lock_sec_rec_cons_read_sees(rec, trx->read_view)) { } else {
/* We are looking into a non-clustered index, /* We are looking into a non-clustered index,
and to get the right version of the record we and to get the right version of the record we
have to look also into the clustered index: this have to look also into the clustered index: this
...@@ -4238,8 +4238,12 @@ row_search_for_mysql( ...@@ -4238,8 +4238,12 @@ row_search_for_mysql(
information via the clustered index record. */ information via the clustered index record. */
ut_ad(index != clust_index); ut_ad(index != clust_index);
ut_ad(!dict_index_is_clust(index));
goto requires_clust_rec; if (!lock_sec_rec_cons_read_sees(
rec, trx->read_view)) {
goto requires_clust_rec;
}
} }
} }
...@@ -4362,8 +4366,13 @@ row_search_for_mysql( ...@@ -4362,8 +4366,13 @@ row_search_for_mysql(
ULINT_UNDEFINED, &heap); ULINT_UNDEFINED, &heap);
result_rec = rec; result_rec = rec;
} }
/* result_rec can legitimately be delete-marked
now that it has been established that it points to a
clustered index record that exists in the read view. */
} else { } else {
result_rec = rec; result_rec = rec;
ut_ad(!rec_get_deleted_flag(rec, comp));
} }
/* We found a qualifying record 'result_rec'. At this point, /* We found a qualifying record 'result_rec'. At this point,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment