BUG#34289 - Incorrect NAME_CONST substitution in stored procedures

            breaks replication

NAME_CONST() didn't replicate constant character set and collation
correctly.

With this fix NAME_CONST() inherits collation from the value argument.
parent b620694b
......@@ -225,4 +225,7 @@ select min(a) from t1 group by inet_ntoa(a);
min(a)
-2
drop table t1;
SELECT NAME_CONST('var', 'value') COLLATE latin1_general_cs;
NAME_CONST('var', 'value') COLLATE latin1_general_cs
value
End of 5.0 tests
......@@ -237,5 +237,11 @@ insert into t1 values (-1), (-2);
select min(a) from t1 group by inet_ntoa(a);
drop table t1;
#
# BUG#34289 - Incorrect NAME_CONST substitution in stored procedures breaks
# replication
#
SELECT NAME_CONST('var', 'value') COLLATE latin1_general_cs;
--echo End of 5.0 tests
......@@ -1240,6 +1240,7 @@ bool Item_name_const::fix_fields(THD *thd, Item **ref)
return TRUE;
}
set_name(item_name->ptr(), (uint) item_name->length(), system_charset_info);
collation.set(value_item->collation.collation, DERIVATION_IMPLICIT);
max_length= value_item->max_length;
decimals= value_item->decimals;
fixed= 1;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment