Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
M
MariaDB
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
nexedi
MariaDB
Commits
9dca446d
Commit
9dca446d
authored
Jun 23, 2005
by
timour@mysql.com
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Plain Diff
Merge tkatchaounov@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-4.1
into mysql.com:/home/timka/mysql/src/4.1-virgin
parents
a5e8bce1
3589c51c
Changes
3
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
3 changed files
with
86 additions
and
7 deletions
+86
-7
mysql-test/r/range.result
mysql-test/r/range.result
+32
-1
mysql-test/t/range.test
mysql-test/t/range.test
+19
-3
sql/opt_range.cc
sql/opt_range.cc
+35
-3
No files found.
mysql-test/r/range.result
View file @
9dca446d
...
...
@@ -556,11 +556,42 @@ count(*)
0
select count(*) from t1 where x > -16;
count(*)
1
2
select count(*) from t1 where x = 18446744073709551601;
count(*)
1
drop table t1;
create table t1 (a bigint unsigned);
create index t1i on t1(a);
insert into t1 select 18446744073709551615;
insert into t1 select 18446744073709551614;
explain select * from t1 where a <> -1;
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 index t1i t1i 9 NULL 2 Using where; Using index
select * from t1 where a <> -1;
a
18446744073709551614
18446744073709551615
explain select * from t1 where a > -1 or a < -1;
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 index t1i t1i 9 NULL 2 Using where; Using index
select * from t1 where a > -1 or a < -1;
a
18446744073709551614
18446744073709551615
explain select * from t1 where a > -1;
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 index t1i t1i 9 NULL 2 Using where; Using index
select * from t1 where a > -1;
a
18446744073709551614
18446744073709551615
explain select * from t1 where a < -1;
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables
select * from t1 where a < -1;
a
drop table t1;
set names latin1;
create table t1 (a char(10), b text, key (a)) character set latin1;
INSERT INTO t1 (a) VALUES
...
...
mysql-test/t/range.test
View file @
9dca446d
...
...
@@ -423,14 +423,30 @@ select count(*) from t1 where x=0;
select
count
(
*
)
from
t1
where
x
<
0
;
select
count
(
*
)
from
t1
where
x
<
-
16
;
select
count
(
*
)
from
t1
where
x
=
-
16
;
# The following query returns wrong value because the range optimizer can't
# handle search on a signed value for an unsigned parameter. This will be fixed in
# 5.0
select
count
(
*
)
from
t1
where
x
>
-
16
;
select
count
(
*
)
from
t1
where
x
=
18446744073709551601
;
drop
table
t1
;
#
# Bug #11185 incorrect comparison of unsigned int to signed constant
#
create
table
t1
(
a
bigint
unsigned
);
create
index
t1i
on
t1
(
a
);
insert
into
t1
select
18446744073709551615
;
insert
into
t1
select
18446744073709551614
;
explain
select
*
from
t1
where
a
<>
-
1
;
select
*
from
t1
where
a
<>
-
1
;
explain
select
*
from
t1
where
a
>
-
1
or
a
<
-
1
;
select
*
from
t1
where
a
>
-
1
or
a
<
-
1
;
explain
select
*
from
t1
where
a
>
-
1
;
select
*
from
t1
where
a
>
-
1
;
explain
select
*
from
t1
where
a
<
-
1
;
select
*
from
t1
where
a
<
-
1
;
drop
table
t1
;
#
# Bug #6045: Binary Comparison regression in MySQL 4.1
# Binary searches didn't use a case insensitive index.
...
...
sql/opt_range.cc
View file @
9dca446d
...
...
@@ -960,7 +960,9 @@ get_mm_parts(PARAM *param, COND *cond_func, Field *field,
if
(
sel_arg
->
type
==
SEL_ARG
::
IMPOSSIBLE
)
{
tree
->
type
=
SEL_TREE
::
IMPOSSIBLE
;
DBUG_RETURN
(
tree
);
/* If this is an NE_FUNC, we still need to check GT_FUNC. */
if
(
!
ne_func
)
DBUG_RETURN
(
tree
);
}
}
else
...
...
@@ -979,8 +981,9 @@ get_mm_parts(PARAM *param, COND *cond_func, Field *field,
SEL_TREE
*
tree2
=
get_mm_parts
(
param
,
cond_func
,
field
,
Item_func
::
GT_FUNC
,
value
,
cmp_type
);
if
(
tree2
)
tree
=
tree_or
(
param
,
tree
,
tree2
);
if
(
!
tree2
)
DBUG_RETURN
(
0
)
tree
=
tree_or
(
param
,
tree
,
tree2
);
}
DBUG_RETURN
(
tree
);
}
...
...
@@ -1159,6 +1162,35 @@ get_mm_leaf(PARAM *param, COND *conf_func, Field *field, KEY_PART *key_part,
if
(
!
(
tree
=
new
SEL_ARG
(
field
,
str
,
str2
)))
DBUG_RETURN
(
0
);
// out of memory
/*
Check if we are comparing an UNSIGNED integer with a negative constant.
In this case we know that:
(a) (unsigned_int [< | <=] negative_constant) == FALSE
(b) (unsigned_int [> | >=] negative_constant) == TRUE
In case (a) the condition is false for all values, and in case (b) it
is true for all values, so we can avoid unnecessary retrieval and condition
testing, and we also get correct comparison of unsinged integers with
negative integers (which otherwise fails because at query execution time
negative integers are cast to unsigned if compared with unsigned).
*/
Item_result
field_result_type
=
field
->
result_type
();
Item_result
value_result_type
=
value
->
result_type
();
if
(
field_result_type
==
INT_RESULT
&&
value_result_type
==
INT_RESULT
&&
((
Field_num
*
)
field
)
->
unsigned_flag
&&
!
((
Item_int
*
)
value
)
->
unsigned_flag
)
{
longlong
item_val
=
value
->
val_int
();
if
(
item_val
<
0
)
{
if
(
type
==
Item_func
::
LT_FUNC
||
type
==
Item_func
::
LE_FUNC
)
{
tree
->
type
=
SEL_ARG
::
IMPOSSIBLE
;
DBUG_RETURN
(
tree
);
}
if
(
type
==
Item_func
::
GT_FUNC
||
type
==
Item_func
::
GE_FUNC
)
DBUG_RETURN
(
0
);
}
}
switch
(
type
)
{
case
Item_func
:
:
LT_FUNC
:
if
(
field_is_equal_to_item
(
field
,
value
))
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment