Commit dc43549f authored by V Narayanan's avatar V Narayanan

merging with mysql-next-mr-svoj

parents e8d01684 21aaf8dd
......@@ -127,6 +127,29 @@
*/
#define HA_BINLOG_ROW_CAPABLE (LL(1) << 34)
#define HA_BINLOG_STMT_CAPABLE (LL(1) << 35)
/*
When a multiple key conflict happens in a REPLACE command mysql
expects the conflicts to be reported in the ascending order of
key names.
For e.g.
CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT, UNIQUE (a), b INT NOT NULL, UNIQUE (b), c INT NOT
NULL, INDEX(c));
REPLACE INTO t1 VALUES (1,1,1),(2,2,2),(2,1,3);
MySQL expects the conflict with 'a' to be reported before the conflict with
'b'.
If the underlying storage engine does not report the conflicting keys in
ascending order, it causes unexpected errors when the REPLACE command is
executed.
This flag helps the underlying SE to inform the server that the keys are not
ordered.
*/
#define HA_DUPLICATE_KEY_NOT_IN_ORDER (LL(1) << 36)
/*
Set of all binlog flags. Currently only contain the capabilities
......
......@@ -1322,6 +1322,23 @@ bool mysql_prepare_insert(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *table_list,
static int last_uniq_key(TABLE *table,uint keynr)
{
/*
When an underlying storage engine informs that the unique key
conflicts are not reported in the ascending order by setting
the HA_DUPLICATE_KEY_NOT_IN_ORDER flag, we cannot rely on this
information to determine the last key conflict.
The information about the last key conflict will be used to
do a replace of the new row on the conflicting row, rather
than doing a delete (of old row) + insert (of new row).
Hence check for this flag and disable replacing the last row
by returning 0 always. Returning 0 will result in doing
a delete + insert always.
*/
if (table->file->ha_table_flags() & HA_DUPLICATE_KEY_NOT_IN_ORDER)
return 0;
while (++keynr < table->s->keys)
if (table->key_info[keynr].flags & HA_NOSAME)
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment