Commit e0c62aad authored by Alexander Nozdrin's avatar Alexander Nozdrin

Manual merge from mysql-5.1.

parents 120425cc a95f54c6
......@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
#include <time.h>
#if defined(_WIN32)
#define _WIN32_WINNT 0x0400
#include <windows.h>
#include <wincrypt.h>
#else
......
......@@ -1631,12 +1631,14 @@ mysql_real_escape_string(MYSQL *mysql, char *to,const char *from,
char * STDCALL
mysql_odbc_escape_string(MYSQL *mysql,
char *to, ulong to_length,
const char *from, ulong from_length,
void *param,
char * (*extend_buffer)
(void *, char *, ulong *))
mysql_odbc_escape_string(MYSQL *mysql __attribute__((unused)),
char *to __attribute__((unused)),
ulong to_length __attribute__((unused)),
const char *from __attribute__((unused)),
ulong from_length __attribute__((unused)),
void *param __attribute__((unused)),
char * (*extend_buffer)(void *, char *, ulong *)
__attribute__((unused)))
{
return NULL;
}
......
......@@ -50,9 +50,6 @@
is killed.
*/
/* Requires Windows 2000 or higher */
#define _WIN32_WINNT 0x0500
#include <windows.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <tlhelp32.h>
......
......@@ -48,5 +48,310 @@ commit;
set autocommit=default;
drop table t1;
#
# Bug#41756 Strange error messages about locks from InnoDB
#
drop table if exists t1;
# In the default transaction isolation mode, and/or with
# innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog=OFF, handler::unlock_row()
# in InnoDB does nothing.
# Thus in order to reproduce the condition that led to the
# warning, one needs to relax isolation by either
# setting a weaker tx_isolation value, or by turning on
# the unsafe replication switch.
# For testing purposes, choose to tweak the isolation level,
# since it's settable at runtime, unlike
# innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog, which is
# only a command-line switch.
#
set @@session.tx_isolation="read-committed";
# Prepare data. We need a table with a unique index,
# for join_read_key to be used. The other column
# allows to control what passes WHERE clause filter.
create table t1 (a int primary key, b int) engine=innodb;
# Let's make sure t1 has sufficient amount of rows
# to exclude JT_ALL access method when reading it,
# i.e. make sure that JT_EQ_REF(a) is always preferred.
insert into t1 values (1,1), (2,null), (3,1), (4,1),
(5,1), (6,1), (7,1), (8,1), (9,1), (10,1),
(11,1), (12,1), (13,1), (14,1), (15,1),
(16,1), (17,1), (18,1), (19,1), (20,1);
#
# Demonstrate that for the SELECT statement
# used later in the test JT_EQ_REF access method is used.
#
explain
select 1 from t1 natural join (select 2 as a, 1 as b union all
select 2 as a, 2 as b) as t2 for update;
id 1
select_type PRIMARY
table <derived2>
type ALL
possible_keys NULL
key NULL
key_len NULL
ref NULL
rows 2
Extra
id 1
select_type PRIMARY
table t1
type eq_ref
possible_keys PRIMARY
key PRIMARY
key_len 4
ref t2.a
rows 1
Extra Using where
id 2
select_type DERIVED
table NULL
type NULL
possible_keys NULL
key NULL
key_len NULL
ref NULL
rows NULL
Extra No tables used
id 3
select_type UNION
table NULL
type NULL
possible_keys NULL
key NULL
key_len NULL
ref NULL
rows NULL
Extra No tables used
id NULL
select_type UNION RESULT
table <union2,3>
type ALL
possible_keys NULL
key NULL
key_len NULL
ref NULL
rows NULL
Extra
#
# Demonstrate that the reported SELECT statement
# no longer produces warnings.
#
select 1 from t1 natural join (select 2 as a, 1 as b union all
select 2 as a, 2 as b) as t2 for update;
1
commit;
#
# Demonstrate that due to lack of inter-sweep "reset" function,
# we keep some non-matching records locked, even though we know
# we could unlock them.
# To do that, show that if there is only one distinct value
# for a in t2 (a=2), we will keep record (2,null) in t1 locked.
# But if we add another value for "a" to t2, say 6,
# join_read_key cache will be pruned at least once,
# and thus record (2, null) in t1 will get unlocked.
#
begin;
select 1 from t1 natural join (select 2 as a, 1 as b union all
select 2 as a, 2 as b) as t2 for update;
1
#
# Switching to connection con1
# We should be able to delete all records from t1 except (2, null),
# since they were not locked.
begin;
# Delete in series of 3 records so that full scan
# is not used and we're not blocked on record (2,null)
delete from t1 where a in (1,3,4);
delete from t1 where a in (5,6,7);
delete from t1 where a in (8,9,10);
delete from t1 where a in (11,12,13);
delete from t1 where a in (14,15,16);
delete from t1 where a in (17,18);
delete from t1 where a in (19,20);
#
# Record (2, null) is locked. This is actually unnecessary,
# because the previous select returned no rows.
# Just demonstrate the effect.
#
delete from t1;
ERROR HY000: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction
rollback;
#
# Switching to connection default
#
# Show that the original contents of t1 is intact:
select * from t1;
a b
1 1
2 NULL
3 1
4 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
8 1
9 1
10 1
11 1
12 1
13 1
14 1
15 1
16 1
17 1
18 1
19 1
20 1
commit;
#
# Have a one more record in t2 to show that
# if join_read_key cache is purned, the current
# row under the cursor is unlocked (provided, this row didn't
# match the partial WHERE clause, of course).
# Sic: the result of this test dependent on the order of retrieval
# of records --echo # from the derived table, if !
# We use DELETE to disable the JOIN CACHE. This DELETE modifies no
# records. It also should leave no InnoDB row locks.
#
begin;
delete t1.* from t1 natural join (select 2 as a, 2 as b union all
select 0 as a, 0 as b) as t2;
# Demonstrate that nothing was deleted form t1
select * from t1;
a b
1 1
2 NULL
3 1
4 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
8 1
9 1
10 1
11 1
12 1
13 1
14 1
15 1
16 1
17 1
18 1
19 1
20 1
#
# Switching to connection con1
begin;
# Since there is another distinct record in the derived table
# the previous matching record in t1 -- (2,null) -- was unlocked.
delete from t1;
# We will need the contents of the table again.
rollback;
select * from t1;
a b
1 1
2 NULL
3 1
4 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
8 1
9 1
10 1
11 1
12 1
13 1
14 1
15 1
16 1
17 1
18 1
19 1
20 1
commit;
#
# Switching to connection default
rollback;
begin;
#
# Before this patch, we could wrongly unlock a record
# that was cached and later used in a join. Demonstrate that
# this is no longer the case.
# Sic: this test is also order-dependent (i.e. the
# the bug would show up only if the first record in the union
# is retreived and processed first.
#
# Verify that JT_EQ_REF is used.
explain
select 1 from t1 natural join (select 3 as a, 2 as b union all
select 3 as a, 1 as b) as t2 for update;
id 1
select_type PRIMARY
table <derived2>
type ALL
possible_keys NULL
key NULL
key_len NULL
ref NULL
rows 2
Extra
id 1
select_type PRIMARY
table t1
type eq_ref
possible_keys PRIMARY
key PRIMARY
key_len 4
ref t2.a
rows 1
Extra Using where
id 2
select_type DERIVED
table NULL
type NULL
possible_keys NULL
key NULL
key_len NULL
ref NULL
rows NULL
Extra No tables used
id 3
select_type UNION
table NULL
type NULL
possible_keys NULL
key NULL
key_len NULL
ref NULL
rows NULL
Extra No tables used
id NULL
select_type UNION RESULT
table <union2,3>
type ALL
possible_keys NULL
key NULL
key_len NULL
ref NULL
rows NULL
Extra
# Lock the record.
select 1 from t1 natural join (select 3 as a, 2 as b union all
select 3 as a, 1 as b) as t2 for update;
1
1
# Switching to connection con1
#
# We should not be able to delete record (3,1) from t1,
# (previously it was possible).
#
delete from t1 where a=3;
ERROR HY000: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction
# Switching to connection default
commit;
set @@session.tx_isolation=default;
drop table t1;
#
# End of 5.1 tests
#
......@@ -13,3 +13,5 @@ kill : Bug#37780 2008-12-03 HHunger need some changes to be
query_cache_28249 : Bug#43861 2009-03-25 main.query_cache_28249 fails sporadically
partition_innodb_builtin : Bug#32430 2009-09-25 mattiasj Waiting for push of Innodb changes
partition_innodb_plugin : Bug#32430 2009-09-25 mattiasj Waiting for push of Innodb changes
innodb-autoinc : Bug#48482 2009-11-02 svoj innodb-autoinc.test fails with results difference
rpl_killed_ddl : Bug#45520: rpl_killed_ddl fails sporadically in pb2
......@@ -70,6 +70,161 @@ commit;
set autocommit=default;
drop table t1;
--echo #
--echo # Bug#41756 Strange error messages about locks from InnoDB
--echo #
--disable_warnings
drop table if exists t1;
--enable_warnings
--echo # In the default transaction isolation mode, and/or with
--echo # innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog=OFF, handler::unlock_row()
--echo # in InnoDB does nothing.
--echo # Thus in order to reproduce the condition that led to the
--echo # warning, one needs to relax isolation by either
--echo # setting a weaker tx_isolation value, or by turning on
--echo # the unsafe replication switch.
--echo # For testing purposes, choose to tweak the isolation level,
--echo # since it's settable at runtime, unlike
--echo # innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog, which is
--echo # only a command-line switch.
--echo #
set @@session.tx_isolation="read-committed";
--echo # Prepare data. We need a table with a unique index,
--echo # for join_read_key to be used. The other column
--echo # allows to control what passes WHERE clause filter.
create table t1 (a int primary key, b int) engine=innodb;
--echo # Let's make sure t1 has sufficient amount of rows
--echo # to exclude JT_ALL access method when reading it,
--echo # i.e. make sure that JT_EQ_REF(a) is always preferred.
insert into t1 values (1,1), (2,null), (3,1), (4,1),
(5,1), (6,1), (7,1), (8,1), (9,1), (10,1),
(11,1), (12,1), (13,1), (14,1), (15,1),
(16,1), (17,1), (18,1), (19,1), (20,1);
--echo #
--echo # Demonstrate that for the SELECT statement
--echo # used later in the test JT_EQ_REF access method is used.
--echo #
--vertical_results
explain
select 1 from t1 natural join (select 2 as a, 1 as b union all
select 2 as a, 2 as b) as t2 for update;
--horizontal_results
--echo #
--echo # Demonstrate that the reported SELECT statement
--echo # no longer produces warnings.
--echo #
select 1 from t1 natural join (select 2 as a, 1 as b union all
select 2 as a, 2 as b) as t2 for update;
commit;
--echo #
--echo # Demonstrate that due to lack of inter-sweep "reset" function,
--echo # we keep some non-matching records locked, even though we know
--echo # we could unlock them.
--echo # To do that, show that if there is only one distinct value
--echo # for a in t2 (a=2), we will keep record (2,null) in t1 locked.
--echo # But if we add another value for "a" to t2, say 6,
--echo # join_read_key cache will be pruned at least once,
--echo # and thus record (2, null) in t1 will get unlocked.
--echo #
begin;
select 1 from t1 natural join (select 2 as a, 1 as b union all
select 2 as a, 2 as b) as t2 for update;
connect (con1,localhost,root,,);
--echo #
--echo # Switching to connection con1
connection con1;
--echo # We should be able to delete all records from t1 except (2, null),
--echo # since they were not locked.
begin;
--echo # Delete in series of 3 records so that full scan
--echo # is not used and we're not blocked on record (2,null)
delete from t1 where a in (1,3,4);
delete from t1 where a in (5,6,7);
delete from t1 where a in (8,9,10);
delete from t1 where a in (11,12,13);
delete from t1 where a in (14,15,16);
delete from t1 where a in (17,18);
delete from t1 where a in (19,20);
--echo #
--echo # Record (2, null) is locked. This is actually unnecessary,
--echo # because the previous select returned no rows.
--echo # Just demonstrate the effect.
--echo #
--error ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT
delete from t1;
rollback;
--echo #
--echo # Switching to connection default
connection default;
--echo #
--echo # Show that the original contents of t1 is intact:
select * from t1;
commit;
--echo #
--echo # Have a one more record in t2 to show that
--echo # if join_read_key cache is purned, the current
--echo # row under the cursor is unlocked (provided, this row didn't
--echo # match the partial WHERE clause, of course).
--echo # Sic: the result of this test dependent on the order of retrieval
--echo # of records --echo # from the derived table, if !
--echo # We use DELETE to disable the JOIN CACHE. This DELETE modifies no
--echo # records. It also should leave no InnoDB row locks.
--echo #
begin;
delete t1.* from t1 natural join (select 2 as a, 2 as b union all
select 0 as a, 0 as b) as t2;
--echo # Demonstrate that nothing was deleted form t1
select * from t1;
--echo #
--echo # Switching to connection con1
connection con1;
begin;
--echo # Since there is another distinct record in the derived table
--echo # the previous matching record in t1 -- (2,null) -- was unlocked.
delete from t1;
--echo # We will need the contents of the table again.
rollback;
select * from t1;
commit;
--echo #
--echo # Switching to connection default
connection default;
rollback;
begin;
--echo #
--echo # Before this patch, we could wrongly unlock a record
--echo # that was cached and later used in a join. Demonstrate that
--echo # this is no longer the case.
--echo # Sic: this test is also order-dependent (i.e. the
--echo # the bug would show up only if the first record in the union
--echo # is retreived and processed first.
--echo #
--echo # Verify that JT_EQ_REF is used.
--vertical_results
explain
select 1 from t1 natural join (select 3 as a, 2 as b union all
select 3 as a, 1 as b) as t2 for update;
--horizontal_results
--echo # Lock the record.
select 1 from t1 natural join (select 3 as a, 2 as b union all
select 3 as a, 1 as b) as t2 for update;
--echo # Switching to connection con1
connection con1;
--echo #
--echo # We should not be able to delete record (3,1) from t1,
--echo # (previously it was possible).
--echo #
--error ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT
delete from t1 where a=3;
--echo # Switching to connection default
connection default;
commit;
disconnect con1;
set @@session.tx_isolation=default;
drop table t1;
--echo #
--echo # End of 5.1 tests
--echo #
......@@ -1954,6 +1954,7 @@ int subselect_single_select_engine::exec()
tab->read_record.record= tab->table->record[0];
tab->read_record.thd= join->thd;
tab->read_record.ref_length= tab->table->file->ref_length;
tab->read_record.unlock_row= rr_unlock_row;
*(last_changed_tab++)= tab;
break;
}
......
......@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void init_read_record_idx(READ_RECORD *info, THD *thd, TABLE *table,
info->file= table->file;
info->record= table->record[0];
info->print_error= print_error;
info->unlock_row= rr_unlock_row;
table->status=0; /* And it's always found */
if (!table->file->inited)
......@@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ void init_read_record(READ_RECORD *info,THD *thd, TABLE *table,
}
info->select=select;
info->print_error=print_error;
info->unlock_row= rr_unlock_row;
info->ignore_not_found_rows= 0;
table->status=0; /* And it's always found */
......
......@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ static int join_read_const_table(JOIN_TAB *tab, POSITION *pos);
static int join_read_system(JOIN_TAB *tab);
static int join_read_const(JOIN_TAB *tab);
static int join_read_key(JOIN_TAB *tab);
static void join_read_key_unlock_row(st_join_table *tab);
static int join_read_always_key(JOIN_TAB *tab);
static int join_read_last_key(JOIN_TAB *tab);
static int join_no_more_records(READ_RECORD *info);
......@@ -5631,7 +5632,9 @@ static bool create_ref_for_key(JOIN *join, JOIN_TAB *j, KEYUSE *org_keyuse,
}
j->ref.key_buff2=j->ref.key_buff+ALIGN_SIZE(length);
j->ref.key_err=1;
j->ref.has_record= FALSE;
j->ref.null_rejecting= 0;
j->ref.use_count= 0;
keyuse=org_keyuse;
store_key **ref_key= j->ref.key_copy;
......@@ -6464,6 +6467,20 @@ make_join_select(JOIN *join,SQL_SELECT *select,COND *cond)
DBUG_RETURN(0);
}
/**
The default implementation of unlock-row method of READ_RECORD,
used in all access methods.
*/
void rr_unlock_row(st_join_table *tab)
{
READ_RECORD *info= &tab->read_record;
info->file->unlock_row();
}
static void
make_join_readinfo(JOIN *join, ulonglong options)
{
......@@ -6479,6 +6496,7 @@ make_join_readinfo(JOIN *join, ulonglong options)
TABLE *table=tab->table;
tab->read_record.table= table;
tab->read_record.file=table->file;
tab->read_record.unlock_row= rr_unlock_row;
tab->next_select=sub_select; /* normal select */
/*
......@@ -6524,6 +6542,7 @@ make_join_readinfo(JOIN *join, ulonglong options)
delete tab->quick;
tab->quick=0;
tab->read_first_record= join_read_key;
tab->read_record.unlock_row= join_read_key_unlock_row;
tab->read_record.read_record= join_no_more_records;
if (table->covering_keys.is_set(tab->ref.key) &&
!table->no_keyread)
......@@ -11360,7 +11379,7 @@ evaluate_join_record(JOIN *join, JOIN_TAB *join_tab,
return NESTED_LOOP_NO_MORE_ROWS;
}
else
join_tab->read_record.file->unlock_row();
join_tab->read_record.unlock_row(join_tab);
}
else
{
......@@ -11370,7 +11389,7 @@ evaluate_join_record(JOIN *join, JOIN_TAB *join_tab,
*/
join->examined_rows++;
join->thd->row_count++;
join_tab->read_record.file->unlock_row();
join_tab->read_record.unlock_row(join_tab);
}
return NESTED_LOOP_OK;
}
......@@ -11730,18 +11749,55 @@ join_read_key(JOIN_TAB *tab)
table->status=STATUS_NOT_FOUND;
return -1;
}
/*
Moving away from the current record. Unlock the row
in the handler if it did not match the partial WHERE.
*/
if (tab->ref.has_record && tab->ref.use_count == 0)
{
tab->read_record.file->unlock_row();
tab->ref.has_record= FALSE;
}
error=table->file->index_read_map(table->record[0],
tab->ref.key_buff,
make_prev_keypart_map(tab->ref.key_parts),
HA_READ_KEY_EXACT);
if (error && error != HA_ERR_KEY_NOT_FOUND && error != HA_ERR_END_OF_FILE)
return report_error(table, error);
if (! error)
{
tab->ref.has_record= TRUE;
tab->ref.use_count= 1;
}
}
else if (table->status == 0)
{
DBUG_ASSERT(tab->ref.has_record);
tab->ref.use_count++;
}
table->null_row=0;
return table->status ? -1 : 0;
}
/**
Since join_read_key may buffer a record, do not unlock
it if it was not used in this invocation of join_read_key().
Only count locks, thus remembering if the record was left unused,
and unlock already when pruning the current value of
TABLE_REF buffer.
@sa join_read_key()
*/
static void
join_read_key_unlock_row(st_join_table *tab)
{
DBUG_ASSERT(tab->ref.use_count);
if (tab->ref.use_count)
tab->ref.use_count--;
}
/*
ref access method implementation: "read_first" function
......
......@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ class store_key;
typedef struct st_table_ref
{
bool key_err;
/** True if something was read into buffer in join_read_key. */
bool has_record;
uint key_parts; ///< num of ...
uint key_length; ///< length of key_buff
int key; ///< key no
......@@ -85,6 +87,11 @@ typedef struct st_table_ref
table_map depend_map; ///< Table depends on these tables.
/* null byte position in the key_buf. Used for REF_OR_NULL optimization */
uchar *null_ref_key;
/*
The number of times the record associated with this key was used
in the join.
*/
ha_rows use_count;
} TABLE_REF;
......
......@@ -115,16 +115,22 @@ typedef struct st_reginfo { /* Extra info about reg */
} REGINFO;
struct st_read_record; /* For referense later */
class SQL_SELECT;
class THD;
class handler;
struct st_join_table;
void rr_unlock_row(st_join_table *tab);
typedef struct st_read_record { /* Parameter to read_record */
struct READ_RECORD { /* Parameter to read_record */
typedef int (*Read_func)(READ_RECORD*);
typedef void (*Unlock_row_func)(st_join_table *);
struct st_table *table; /* Head-form */
handler *file;
struct st_table **forms; /* head and ref forms */
int (*read_record)(struct st_read_record *);
Read_func read_record;
Unlock_row_func unlock_row;
THD *thd;
SQL_SELECT *select;
uint cache_records;
......@@ -136,7 +142,7 @@ typedef struct st_read_record { /* Parameter to read_record */
uchar *cache,*cache_pos,*cache_end,*read_positions;
IO_CACHE *io_cache;
bool print_error, ignore_not_found_rows;
} READ_RECORD;
};
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment