1. 13 Aug, 2012 1 commit
  2. 11 Aug, 2012 2 commits
  3. 09 Aug, 2012 10 commits
    • Sergey Glukhov's avatar
      5.1 -> 5.5 merge · ec766b5d
      Sergey Glukhov authored
      ec766b5d
    • Sergey Glukhov's avatar
      Bug #14409015 MEMORY LEAK WHEN REFERENCING OUTER FIELD IN HAVING · af3fdefc
      Sergey Glukhov authored
      When resolving outer fields, Item_field::fix_outer_fields()
      creates new Item_refs for each execution of a prepared statement, so
      these must be allocated in the runtime memroot. The memroot switching
      before resolving JOIN::having causes these to be allocated in the
      statement root, leaking memory for each PS execution.
      af3fdefc
    • Mattias Jonsson's avatar
      Bug#14342883: SELECT QUERY RETURNS NOT ALL · 88546a18
      Mattias Jonsson authored
      ROWS THAT ARE EXPECTED
      
      For non range/list partitioned tables (i.e. HASH/KEY):
      
      When prune_partitions finds a multi-range list
      (or in this test '<>') for a field of the partition index,
      even if it cannot make any use of the multi-range,
      it will continue with the next field of the partition index
      and use that for pruning (even if it the previous
      field could not be used). This results in partitions is
      pruned away, leaving partitions that only matches
      the last field in the partition index, and will exclude
      partitions which might match any previous fields.
      
      Fixed by skipping rest of partitioning key fields/parts
      if current key field/part could not be used.
      
      Also notice it is the order of the fields in the CREATE TABLE
      statement that triggers this bug, not the order of fields in
      primary/unique key or PARTITION BY KEY ().
      It must not be the last field in the partitioning expression that
      is not equal (or have a non single point range).
      I.e. the partitioning index is created with the same field order
      as in the CREATE TABLE. And for the bug to appear
      the last field must be a single point and some previous field
      must be a multi-point range.
      88546a18
    • mysql-builder@oracle.com's avatar
      No commit message · d61a7909
      mysql-builder@oracle.com authored
      No commit message
      d61a7909
    • mysql-builder@oracle.com's avatar
      No commit message · 17d64241
      mysql-builder@oracle.com authored
      No commit message
      17d64241
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Null merge from mysql-5.1. · badba700
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      badba700
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Merge from mysql-5.1 to working copy. · 7e7ba738
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      7e7ba738
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. · f491c04f
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      f491c04f
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Bug#14399148 INNODB TABLES UNDER LOAD PRODUCE DUPLICATE COPIES OF ROWS · e0482cb0
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      IN QUERIES
      
      This bug was caused by an incorrect fix of
      Bug#13807811 BTR_PCUR_RESTORE_POSITION() CAN SKIP A RECORD
      
      There was nothing wrong with btr_pcur_restore_position(), but with the
      use of it in the table scan during index creation.
      
      rb:1206 approved by Jimmy Yang
      e0482cb0
    • Sunanda Menon's avatar
      Merge from mysql-5.1.65-release · dd8a7a93
      Sunanda Menon authored
      dd8a7a93
  4. 08 Aug, 2012 2 commits
    • Rohit Kalhans's avatar
      upmerge from mysql-5.1=>mysql-5.5 · 15801c60
      Rohit Kalhans authored
      15801c60
    • Rohit Kalhans's avatar
      BUG#11757312: MYSQLBINLOG DOES NOT ACCEPT INPUT FROM STDIN · 941924e8
      Rohit Kalhans authored
      WHEN STDIN IS A PIPE
                  
      Problem: Mysqlbinlog does not accept the input from STDIN when 
      STDIN is a pipe. This prevents the users from passing the input file
      through a shell pipe.    
      
      Background: The my_seek() function does not check if the file descriptor
      passed to it is regular (seekable) file. The check_header() function in
      mysqlbinlog calls the my_b_seek() unconditionally and it fails when
      the underlying file is a PIPE.  
                  
      Resolution: We resolve this problem by checking if the underlying file
      is a regular file by using my_fstat() before calling my_b_seek(). 
      If the underlying file is not seekable we skip the call to my_b_seek()
      in check_header().
      941924e8
  5. 07 Aug, 2012 5 commits
    • Nirbhay Choubey's avatar
      fb697972
    • Nirbhay Choubey's avatar
      Bug#13928675 MYSQL CLIENT COPYRIGHT NOTICE MUST · d4e4538b
      Nirbhay Choubey authored
                   SHOW 2012 INSTEAD OF 2011
      
      * Added a new macro to hold the current year :
        COPYRIGHT_NOTICE_CURRENT_YEAR
      * Modified ORACLE_WELCOME_COPYRIGHT_NOTICE macro
        to take the initial year as parameter and pick
        current year from the above mentioned macro.
      d4e4538b
    • Harin Vadodaria's avatar
      Bug#14068244: INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN LIBMYSQLCLIENT/LIBMYSQLCLIENT_R · 7b343df2
      Harin Vadodaria authored
                    AND LIBCRYPTO
      
      Description: Merge from 5.1 to 5.5
      7b343df2
    • Harin Vadodaria's avatar
      Bug#14068244: INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN LIBMYSQLCLIENT/LIBMYSQLCLIENT_R · a9acf42b
      Harin Vadodaria authored
                    AND LIBCRYPTO
      
      Problem: libmysqlclient_r exports symbols from yaSSL library which
               conflict with openSSL symbols. This issue is related to symbols
               used by CURL library and are defined in taocrypt. Taocrypt has
               dummy implementation of these functions. Due to this when a
               program which uses libcurl library functions is compiled using
               libmysqlclient_r and libcurl, it hits segmentation fault in
               execution phase.
      
      Solution: MySQL should not be exporting such symbols. However, these
                functions are not used by MySQL code at all. So avoid compiling
                them in the first place.
      a9acf42b
    • Praveenkumar Hulakund's avatar
      Bug#13058122 - DML, LOCK/UNLOCK TABLES AND SELECT LEAD TO · da244123
      Praveenkumar Hulakund authored
      FOREVER MDL LOCK
      
      Analysis:
      ----------
      While granting MDL lock for the lock requests in wait queue,
      first the lock is granted to the high priority lock types
      and then to the low priority lock types.
      
      MDL Priority Matrix,
        +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+
        | Locks       |    |   |   |   |    |     |
        | has Priority|    |   |   |   |    |     |
        | over --->   |  S | SR| SW| SU| SNW| SNRW|   
        +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+
        | X           |  + | + | + | + | +  | +   |
        +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----|
        | SNRW        |  - | + | + | - | -  | -   |
        +-------------|----|---|---|---|----|-----|
        | SNW         |  - | - | + | - | -  | -   |
        +-------------+----+---+---+---+----+-----+
      
      Here '+' means, Lock priority is higher.
           '-' means, Has same priority
      
      In the scenario where,
         *. Lock wait queue has requests of type S/SR/SW/SU.
         *. And locks of high priority X/SNRW/SNW are requested 
            continuously.
      
      In this case, while granting lock, always first high priority 
      lock requests(X/SNRW/SNW) are considered. Low priority 
      locks(S/SR/SW/SU) will not get chance and they will 
      wait forever.
      
      In the scenario for which this bug is reported, application
      executed many LOCK TABLES ... WRITE statements concurrently.
      These statements request SNRW lock. Also there were some
      connections trying to execute DML statements requesting SR
      lock. Since SNRW lock request has higher priority (and as
      they were too many waiting SNRW requests) lock is always 
      granted to it. So, lock request SR will wait forever, resulting
      in DML starvation.
      
      How is this handled in 5.1?
      ---------------------------
      Even in 5.1 we have low priority lock starvation issue.
      But, in 5.1 thread locking, system variable 
      "max_write_lock_count" can be configured to grant
      some pending read lock requests. After 
      "max_write_lock_count" of write lock grants all the low
      priority locks are granted.
      
      Why this issue is seen in 5.5/trunk?
      ---------------------------------
      In 5.5/trunk MDL locking, "max_write_lock_count" system 
      variable exists but not used in MDL, only thread lock uses
      it. So no effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL locking.
      This means that starvation of metadata locks is possible 
      even if max_write_lock_count is used.
      
      Looks like, customer was using "max_write_lock_count" in
      5.1 and when upgraded to 5.5, starvation is seen because
      of not having effect of "max_write_lock_count" in MDL.
      
      Fix:
      ----------
      As a fix, support for max_write_lock_count is added to MDL.
      To maintain write lock counter per MDL_lock object, new
      member "m_hog_lock_count" is added in MDL_lock.
      
      And following logic is added to increment the counter in 
      function reschedule_waiters, 
      (reschedule_waiters function is called while thread is
       releasing the lock)
          - After granting lock request from the wait queue.
          -  Check if there are any S/SR/SU/SW exists in the wait queue
            - If yes then increment the "m_hog_lock_count"
      
      And following logic is added in the same function to
      handle pending S/SU/SR/SW locks
          
          - Before granting locks 
          - Check if max_write_lock_count <= m_hog_lock_count
          - If Yes, then try to grant S/SR/SW/SU locks. 
            (Since all of these has same priority, all locks are
             granted together. But some lock grant may fail because
             of grant incompatibility)
          - Reset m_hog_lock_count if there no low priority lock
            requests in wait queue. 
          - return
      
      Note:
      --------------------------
      In the lock priority matrix explained above,
      though X has priority over the SNW and SNRW. X locks is
      taken mostly for RENAME, TRUNCATE, CREATE ... operations.
      So lock type X may not be requested in loop continuously 
      in real world applications, as compared to other lock 
      request types. So, lock request of type SNW and SNRW are 
      not starved. So, we can grant all S/SR/SU/SW in one shot,
      without considering SNW & SNRW lock request starvation.
      
      ALTER table operations take SU lock first and then 
      upgrade to SNW if required. All S, SR, SW, SU have same
      lock priority. So while granting SU, request of types
      SR, SW, S are also granted in one shot. So, lock request 
      of type SU->SNW in loop will not make other low priority 
      lock request to starve.
      
      But, when there is request for lock of type SNRW, lock
      requests of lower priority types are not granted. And if 
      SNRW is requested in loop continuously then all 
      S, SR, SW, SU are starved.
      
      This patch addresses the latter scenario.
      When we have S/SR/SW/SU in wait queue and if 
      there are
          - Continuous SNRW lock requests
          - OR one or more X and Continuous SNRW lock requests.
          - OR one SNW and Continuous SNRW lock requests.
          - OR one SNW, one or more X and continuous SNRW lock 
            requests.
      in wait queue then, S/SR/SW/SU lock request are starved.
      da244123
  6. 06 Aug, 2012 1 commit
  7. 05 Aug, 2012 1 commit
  8. 02 Aug, 2012 1 commit
  9. 31 Jul, 2012 2 commits
  10. 27 Jul, 2012 4 commits
  11. 26 Jul, 2012 10 commits
    • Praveenkumar Hulakund's avatar
      Merge from 5.1 to 5.5 · 3785ca65
      Praveenkumar Hulakund authored
      3785ca65
    • Praveenkumar Hulakund's avatar
      BUG#13868860 - LIMIT '5' IS EXECUTED WITHOUT ERROR WHEN '5' · bb64579d
      Praveenkumar Hulakund authored
                     IS PLACE HOLDER AND USE SERVER-SIDE 
      
      Analysis:
      LIMIT always takes nonnegative integer constant values. 
      
      http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/select.html
      
      So parsing of value '5' for LIMIT in SELECT fails.
      
      But, within prepared statement, LIMIT parameters can be
      specified using '?' markers. Value for the parameter can
      be supplied while executing the prepared statement.
      
      Passing string values, float or double value for LIMIT
      works well from CLI. Because, while setting the value
      for the parameters from the variable list (added using
      SET), if the value is for parameter LIMIT then its 
      converted to integer value. 
      
      But, when prepared statement is executed from the other
      interfaces as J connectors, or C applications etc.
      The value for the parameters are sent to the server
      with execute command. Each item in log has value and
      the data TYPE. So, While setting parameter value
      from this log, value is set to all the parameters
      with the same data type as passed.
      But here logic to convert value to integer type
      if its for LIMIT parameter is missing.
      Because of this,string '5' is set to LIMIT.
      And the same is logged into the binlog file too. 
      
      Fix:
      When executing prepared statement having parameter for
      CLI it worked fine, as the value set for the parameter
      is converted to integer. And this failed in other 
      interfaces as J connector,C Applications etc as this 
      conversion is missing.
      
      So, as a fix added check while setting value for the
      parameters. If the parameter is for LIMIT value then
      its converted to integer value.
      bb64579d
    • Venkata Sidagam's avatar
      Bug #12876932 - INCORRECT SELECT RESULT ON FEDERATED TABLE · 2e1f259f
      Venkata Sidagam authored
                        
      Merged pb2 test failure fix from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5
      2e1f259f
    • Venkata Sidagam's avatar
      Bug #12876932 - INCORRECT SELECT RESULT ON FEDERATED TABLE · c6c8645a
      Venkata Sidagam authored
      Fix for pb2 test failure.
      c6c8645a
    • Nirbhay Choubey's avatar
      0f532388
    • Nirbhay Choubey's avatar
      Bug#13741677 MYSQL_SECURE_INSTALLATION DOES NOT · b89363de
      Nirbhay Choubey authored
                   WORK + SAVES ROOT PASSWORD TO DISK!
      
      The secure installation scripts connect to the
      server by storing the password in a temporary
      option file. Now, if the script gets killed or
      fails for some reason, the removal of the option
      file may not take place.
      
      This patch introduces following enhancements :
      * (.sh) Made sure that cleanup happens at every
        call to 'exit 1'. This is performed implicitly
        by END{} in pl.in.
      * (.pl.in) Added a warning in case unlink fails
        to delete the option/query files.
      * (.sh/.pl.in) Added more signals to the signal
        handler list. SIG# 1, 3, 6, 15
      b89363de
    • Tor Didriksen's avatar
      merge 5.1 => 5.5 · da4f2a26
      Tor Didriksen authored
      da4f2a26
    • Tor Didriksen's avatar
    • Venkata Sidagam's avatar
      Bug #12876932 - INCORRECT SELECT RESULT ON FEDERATED TABLE · b8241479
      Venkata Sidagam authored
            
      Merged from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5
      b8241479
    • Venkata Sidagam's avatar
      Bug #12876932 - INCORRECT SELECT RESULT ON FEDERATED TABLE · 3b954d1d
      Venkata Sidagam authored
      Problem description:
      Table 't' created with two colums having compound index on both the 
      columns under innodb/myisam engine at remote machine. In the local 
      machine same table is created undet the federated engine.
      A select having where clause with along 'AND' operation gives wrong 
      results on local machine.
      
      Analysis: 
      The given query at federated engine is wrongly transformed by 
      federated::create_where_from_key() function and the same was sent to 
      the remote machine. Hence the local machine is showing wrong results.
      
      Given query "select c1 from t where c1 <= 2 and c2 = 1;"
      Query transformed, after ha_federated::create_where_from_key() function is:
      SELECT `c1`, `c2` FROM `t` WHERE  (`c1` IS NOT NULL ) AND 
      ( (`c1` >= 2)  AND  (`c2` <= 1) ) and the same sent to real_query().
      In the above the '<=' and '=' conditions were transformed to '>=' and 
      '<=' respectively.
      
      ha_federated::create_where_from_key() function behaving as below:
      The key_range is having both the start_key and end_key. The start_key 
      is used to get "(`c1` IS NOT NULL )" part of the where clause, this 
      transformation is correct. The end_key is used to get "( (`c1` >= 2) 
      AND  (`c2` <= 1) )", which is wrong, here the given conditions('<=' and '=') 
      are changed as wrong conditions('>=' and '<=').
      The end_key is having {key = 0x39fa6d0 "", length = 10, keypart_map = 3, 
      flag = HA_READ_AFTER_KEY}
      
      The store_length is having value '5'. Based on store_length and length 
      values the condition values is applied in HA_READ_AFTER_KEY switch case.
      The switch case 'HA_READ_AFTER_KEY' is applicable to only the last part of 
      the end_key and for previous parts it is going to 'HA_READ_KEY_OR_NEXT' case, 
      here the '>=' is getting added as a condition instead of '<='.
      
      Fix:
      Updated the 'if' condition in 'HA_READ_AFTER_KEY' case to affect for all 
      parts of the end_key. i.e 'i > 0' will used for end_key, Hence added it in 
      the if condition.
      3b954d1d
  12. 25 Jul, 2012 1 commit
    • Thayumanavar's avatar
      Bug#13699303 - THREAD POOL PLUGIN IGNORES TIMEOUT. · 436c0b04
      Thayumanavar authored
      PROBLEM: 
      mysql provides a feature where in a session which is 
      idle for a period specified by the wait_timeout variable
      (whose value is in seconds), the session is closed
      This feature is not present when we use thread pool.
      FIX:
      This patch implements the interface functions which is 
      required to implement the wait_timeout functionality
      in the thread pool plugin.
      436c0b04