- 16 Mar, 2007 2 commits
-
-
serg@janus.mylan authored
-
serg@janus.mylan authored
into janus.mylan:/usr/home/serg/Abk/mysql-5.1
-
- 15 Mar, 2007 11 commits
-
-
joerg@trift2. authored
into trift2.:/MySQL/M51/mysql-5.1
-
svoj@april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/bk/mysql-5.1-engines
-
-
svoj@mysql.com/april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/bk/mysql-5.0-engines
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
into mockturtle.local:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-4.1-merge
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
into mockturtle.local:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.0-merge
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
into mockturtle.local:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.1-bg25966
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
into mockturtle.local:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.0-bg25966-2
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
TABLE ... WRITE". Memory and CPU hogging occured when connection which had to wait for table lock was serviced by thread which previously serviced connection that was killed (note that connections can reuse threads if thread cache is enabled). One possible scenario which exposed this problem was when thread which provided binlog dump to replication slave was implicitly/automatically killed when the same slave reconnected and started pulling data through different thread/connection. The problem also occured when one killed particular query in connection (using KILL QUERY) and later this connection had to wait for some table lock. This problem was caused by the fact that thread-specific mysys_var::abort variable, which indicates that waiting operations on mysys layer should be aborted (this includes waiting for table locks), was set by kill operation but was never reset back. So this value was "inherited" by the following statements or even other connections (which reused the same physical thread). Such discrepancy between this variable and THD::killed flag broke logic on SQL-layer and caused CPU and memory hogging. This patch tries to fix this problem by properly resetting this member. There is no test-case associated with this patch since it is hard to test for memory/CPU hogging conditions in our test-suite.
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
TABLE ... WRITE". CPU hogging occured when connection which had to wait for table lock was serviced by thread which previously serviced connection that was killed (note that connections can reuse threads if thread cache is enabled). One possible scenario which exposed this problem was when thread which provided binlog dump to replication slave was implicitly/automatically killed when the same slave reconnected and started pulling data through different thread/connection. In 5.* versions memory hogging was added to CPU hogging. Moreover in those versions the problem also occured when one killed particular query in connection (using KILL QUERY) and later this connection had to wait for some table lock. This problem was caused by the fact that thread-specific mysys_var::abort variable, which indicates that waiting operations on mysys layer should be aborted (this includes waiting for table locks), was set by kill operation but was never reset back. So this value was "inherited" by the following statements or even other connections (which reused the same physical thread). Such discrepancy between this variable and THD::killed flag broke logic on SQL-layer and caused CPU and memory hogging. This patch tries to fix this problem by properly resetting this member. There is no test-case associated with this patch since it is hard to test for memory/CPU hogging conditions in our test-suite.
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
into mockturtle.local:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.1-bg25966
-
- 14 Mar, 2007 13 commits
-
-
kent@kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.0-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-4.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
Updated to version 0.6 of the text
-
kent@kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.1-build
-
kent@kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.0-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.0-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-4.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-4.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
Added test for sched_yield() possibly in -lposix4 on Solaris
-
istruewing@blade08.mysql.com authored
into blade08.mysql.com:/data0/istruewing/autopush/mysql-5.1-bug25460
-
svoj@april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG26881/mysql-5.1-engines
-
- 13 Mar, 2007 11 commits
-
-
svoj@mysql.com/april.(none) authored
-
istruewing@blade08.mysql.com authored
into blade08.mysql.com:/data0/istruewing/autopush/mysql-5.1-bug25460
-
istruewing@chilla.local authored
The previous two patches for this bug worked together so that no permanent table was memory mapped. The first patch tried to avoid mapping while a table is in use. It allowed mapping only if there was exactly one lock on the table, assuming that the calling thread owned it. During mi_open(), a different call to memory mapping was coded, which did not have this limitation. The second patch tried to remove the code duplication and just called mi_extra() from mi_open() an thus inherited the limitation. But on open, a thread does not have a lock on the table... A possible solution would be to check for zero or one lock. But since I learned that it is safe to memory map a file while normal file I/O is done on it, I removed the restriction altogether and allow to memory map while a table is in use. No test case. I do not see a chance to verify with the test suite which kind of I/O is used on a table.
-
svoj@april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG26881/mysql-5.1-engines
-
svoj@mysql.com/april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG26881/mysql-5.0-engines
-
svoj@mysql.com/april.(none) authored
differences in tables Certain merge tables were wrongly reported as having incorrect definition: - Some fields that are 1 byte long (e.g. TINYINT, CHAR(1)), might be internally casted (in certain cases) to a different type on a storage engine layer. (affects 4.1 and up) - If tables in a merge (and a MERGE table itself) had short VARCHAR column (less than 4 bytes) and at least one (but not all) tables were ALTER'ed (even to an identical table: ALTER TABLE xxx ENGINE=yyy), table definitions went ouf of sync. (affects 4.1 only) This is fixed by relaxing a check for underlying conformance and setting field type to FIELD_TYPE_STRING in case varchar is shorter than 4 when a table is created.
-
svoj@april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG26881/mysql-5.1-engines
-
svoj@april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG26881/mysql-5.1-engines
-
svoj@mysql.com/april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG26881/mysql-5.0-engines
-
svoj@mysql.com/april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG26881/mysql-5.0-engines
-
svoj@mysql.com/april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG26881/mysql-4.1-engines
-
- 12 Mar, 2007 3 commits
-
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.0-build
-
kent@kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.0-build
-