- 16 Mar, 2007 1 commit
-
-
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/mrg/mysql-5.1-opt
-
- 15 Mar, 2007 19 commits
-
-
joerg@trift2. authored
into trift2.:/MySQL/M51/mysql-5.1
-
svoj@april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/bk/mysql-5.1-engines
-
-
svoj@mysql.com/april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/bk/mysql-5.0-engines
-
holyfoot/hf@mysql.com/hfmain.(none) authored
-
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/mrg/mysql-5.1-opt
-
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/mrg/mysql-5.1-opt
-
holyfoot/hf@mysql.com/hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/mrg/mysql-5.0-opt
-
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/mrg/mysql-5.1-opt
-
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/mrg/mysql-5.1-opt
-
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/mrg/mysql-5.1-opt
-
holyfoot/hf@mysql.com/hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/mrg/mysql-5.0-opt
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
into mockturtle.local:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-4.1-merge
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
into mockturtle.local:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.0-merge
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
into mockturtle.local:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.1-bg25966
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
into mockturtle.local:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.0-bg25966-2
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
TABLE ... WRITE". Memory and CPU hogging occured when connection which had to wait for table lock was serviced by thread which previously serviced connection that was killed (note that connections can reuse threads if thread cache is enabled). One possible scenario which exposed this problem was when thread which provided binlog dump to replication slave was implicitly/automatically killed when the same slave reconnected and started pulling data through different thread/connection. The problem also occured when one killed particular query in connection (using KILL QUERY) and later this connection had to wait for some table lock. This problem was caused by the fact that thread-specific mysys_var::abort variable, which indicates that waiting operations on mysys layer should be aborted (this includes waiting for table locks), was set by kill operation but was never reset back. So this value was "inherited" by the following statements or even other connections (which reused the same physical thread). Such discrepancy between this variable and THD::killed flag broke logic on SQL-layer and caused CPU and memory hogging. This patch tries to fix this problem by properly resetting this member. There is no test-case associated with this patch since it is hard to test for memory/CPU hogging conditions in our test-suite.
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
TABLE ... WRITE". CPU hogging occured when connection which had to wait for table lock was serviced by thread which previously serviced connection that was killed (note that connections can reuse threads if thread cache is enabled). One possible scenario which exposed this problem was when thread which provided binlog dump to replication slave was implicitly/automatically killed when the same slave reconnected and started pulling data through different thread/connection. In 5.* versions memory hogging was added to CPU hogging. Moreover in those versions the problem also occured when one killed particular query in connection (using KILL QUERY) and later this connection had to wait for some table lock. This problem was caused by the fact that thread-specific mysys_var::abort variable, which indicates that waiting operations on mysys layer should be aborted (this includes waiting for table locks), was set by kill operation but was never reset back. So this value was "inherited" by the following statements or even other connections (which reused the same physical thread). Such discrepancy between this variable and THD::killed flag broke logic on SQL-layer and caused CPU and memory hogging. This patch tries to fix this problem by properly resetting this member. There is no test-case associated with this patch since it is hard to test for memory/CPU hogging conditions in our test-suite.
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
into mockturtle.local:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.1-bg25966
-
- 14 Mar, 2007 20 commits
-
-
kent@kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.0-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-4.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
Updated to version 0.6 of the text
-
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
-
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
-
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
into magare.gmz:/home/kgeorge/mysql/autopush/B26794-merge-5.1-opt
-
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
into magare.gmz:/home/kgeorge/mysql/autopush/B26794-merge-5.1-opt
-
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
-
kent@kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.1-build
-
kent@kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.0-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.0-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-4.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-4.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
Added test for sched_yield() possibly in -lposix4 on Solaris
-
mhansson@dl145s.mysql.com authored
into dl145s.mysql.com:/users/mhansson/mysql/autopush/5.1o-bug24778
-
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
-
mhansson/martin@linux-st28.site authored
This bug was intruduced by the fix for bug#17212 (in 4.1). It is not ok to call test_if_skip_sort_order since this function will alter the execution plan. By contract it is not ok to call test_if_skip_sort_order in this context. This bug appears only in the case when the optimizer has chosen an index for accessing a particular table but finds a covering index that enables it to skip ORDER BY. This happens in test_if_skip_sort_order.
-
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
It was syntactically correct to define spatial keys over parts of columns (e.g. ALTER TABLE t1 ADD x GEOMETRY NOT NULL, ADD SPATIAL KEY (x(32))). This may lead to undefined results and/or interpretation. Fixed by not allowing partial column specification in a SPATIAL index definition.
-