1. 29 Apr, 2011 9 commits
  2. 28 Apr, 2011 2 commits
  3. 27 Apr, 2011 9 commits
  4. 26 Apr, 2011 9 commits
  5. 25 Apr, 2011 2 commits
  6. 23 Apr, 2011 3 commits
  7. 22 Apr, 2011 3 commits
    • Sergey Glukhov's avatar
      5.1 -> 5.5 merge · 0f763f4f
      Sergey Glukhov authored
      0f763f4f
    • Sergey Glukhov's avatar
      Bug#11756928 48916: SERVER INCORRECTLY PROCESSING HAVING CLAUSES WITH AN ORDER BY CLAUSE · 76f37a02
      Sergey Glukhov authored
      Before sorting HAVING condition is split into two parts,
      first part is a table related condition and the rest of is
      HAVING part. Extraction of HAVING part does not take into account
      the fact that some of conditions might be non-const but
      have 'used_tables' == 0 (independent subqueries)
      and because of that these conditions are cut off by
      make_cond_for_table() function.
      The fix is to use (table_map) 0 instead of used_tables in
      third argument for make_cond_for_table() function.
      It allows to extract elements which belong to sorted
      table and in addition elements which are independend
      subqueries.
      76f37a02
    • Sergey Vojtovich's avatar
      Merge. · 2594941b
      Sergey Vojtovich authored
      2594941b
  8. 21 Apr, 2011 3 commits