- 14 Jul, 2011 6 commits
-
-
unknown authored
- Added an initial set of feature-specific test cases - Handled the special case where the materialized subquery of an IN predicates consists of only NULL values. - Fixed a bug where making Item_in_subselect a constant, didn't respect its null_value value.
-
unknown authored
Analysis: For some of the re-executions of the correlated subquery the where clause is false. In these cases the execution of the subquery detects that it must generate a NULL row because of implicit grouping. In this case the subquery execution reaches the following code in do_select(): while ((table= li++)) mark_as_null_row(table->table); This code marks all rows in the table as complete NULL rows. In the example, when evaluating the field t2.f10 for the second row, all bits of Field::null_ptr[0] are set by the previous call to mark_as_null_row(). Then the call to Field::is_null() returns true, resulting in a NULL for the MAX function. Thus the lines above are not suitable for subquery re-execution because mark_as_null_row() changes the NULL bits of each table field, and there is no logic to restore these fields. Solution: The call to mark_as_null_row() was added by the fix for bug lp:613029. Therefore removing the fix for lp:613029 corrects this wrong result. At the same time the test for lp:613029 behaves correctly because the changes of MWL#89 result in a different execution path where: - the constant subquery is evaluated via JOIN::exec_const_cond - detecting that it has an empty result triggers the branch if (zero_result_cause) return_zero_rows() - return_zero_rows() calls mark_as_null_row().
-
unknown authored
-
Igor Babaev authored
-
Igor Babaev authored
The attribute not_null_tables could be calculated incorrectly in the function SELECT_LEX::update_used_tables for queries over views with row items in the WHERE clause. It happened because no implementation of the virtual callback function eval_not_null_tables was provided for the class Item_row. Also slightly optimized the code calculating the value of the maybe_null flag for tables in the function SELECT_LEX::update_used_tables.
-
Igor Babaev authored
-
- 13 Jul, 2011 7 commits
-
-
unknown authored
Analysis: This is a bug in MWL#68, where it was incorrectly assumed that if there is a match in the only non-null key, then if there is a covering NULL row on all remaining NULL-able columns there is a partial match. However, this is not the case, because even if there is such a null-only sub-row, it is not guaranteed to be part of the matched sub-row. The matched sub-row and the NULL-only sub-row may be parts of different rows. In fact there are two cases: - there is a complete row with only NULL values, and - all nullable columns contain only NULL values. These two cases were incorrectly mixed up in the class member subselect_partial_match_engine::covering_null_row_width. Solution: The solution is to: - split covering_null_row_width into two members: has_covering_null_row, and has_covering_null_columns, and - take into account each state during initialization and execution.
-
Igor Babaev authored
-
Igor Babaev authored
class for Item_func_xor. Added the implementation of the subst_argument_checker virtual method that the objects of this class used to use before the patch. Reverted the previous result changes in sunselect_sj and subselect_sj_jcl6.
-
unknown authored
-
unknown authored
In addition to the bug fix explained below, the patch performs few renames, and adds some comments to avoid similar problems. Analysis: The failed assert was due to a bug in MWL#68, where it was incorrectly assumed that the size of the bitmap subselect_rowid_merge_engine::null_only_columns should be the same as the size of the array of Ordered_keys. The bitmap null_only_columns contains bits to mark columns that contain only NULLs. Therefore the indexes of the bits to be set in null_only_columns are different from the indexes of the Ordered_keys. If there is a NULL-only column that appears in a table after the last partial match column with Ordered_key, this NULL-only column would require setting a bit with index bigger than the size of the bitmap null_only_columns. Accessing such a bit caused the failed assert. Solution: Upon analysis, it turns out that null_only_columns is not needed at all, because we are looking for partial matches, and having such columns guarantees that there is a partial match for any corresponding outer value. Therefore the patch removes subselect_rowid_merge_engine::null_only_columns.
-
Sergey Petrunya authored
-
Igor Babaev authored
The bitmap of used tables must be evaluated for the select list of every materialized derived table / view and saved in a dedicated field. This is also applied to materialized subqueries.
-
- 12 Jul, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Sergey Petrunya authored
-
- 11 Jul, 2011 4 commits
-
-
Sergey Petrunya authored
Port of code for: (part of testcase is in mysql-test/t/subquery*.test and will be ported separately) Bug#11766642: crash in Item_field::register_field_in_read_map with view (Former 59793) Prior to the refactoring in this patch, Item_cond_xor behaved partially as an Item_cond and partially as an Item_func. The reasoning behind this was that XOR is currently not optimized (thus should be Item_func instead of Item_cond), but it was planned optimize it in the future (thus, made Item_cond anyway to ease optimization later). Even though Item_cond inherits from Item_func, there are differences between these two. One difference is that the arguments are stored differently. Item_cond stores them in a list while Item_func store them in an args[]. BUG no 45221 was caused by Item_cond_xor storing arguments in the list while users of the objects would look for them in args[]. The fix back then was to store the arguments in both locations. In this bug, Item_cond_xor initially gets two Item_field arguments. These are stored in the list inherited from Item_cond and in args[] inherited from Item_func. During resolution, find_field_in_view() replaces the Item_fields stored in the list with Item_direct_view_refs, but args[] still points to the unresolved Item_fields. This shows that the fix for 45221 was incorrect. The refactoring performed in this patch removes the confusion by making the XOR item an Item_func period. A neg_transformer() is also implemented for Item_func_xor to improve performance when negating XOR expressions. An XOR is negated by negating one of the operands.
-
Igor Babaev authored
Auto-generated names for view field items must be allocated in the statement memory, not in the execution memory of the statement.
-
Sergey Petrunya authored
The cause of the crash is sj_nest->sj_subq_pred->unit->first_select()->item_list contains "stale" items for the second execution. By "stale" I mean that they have item->fixed==FALSE, and they are Item_field object instead of Item_direct_view_ref. The solution is to use sj_nest->sj_subq_pred->unit->first_select()->ref_pointer_array. Surprisingly, that array contains items that are ok. Oracle team has introduced and is using NESTED_JOIN::sj_inner_exprs, but we go without that and always copy the ref_pointer_array.
-
Igor Babaev authored
Missing initialization of the bitmap not_null_tables_cache to 0 in the function Item_func::eval_not_null_tables caused this bug. This function is called indirectly from the function SELECT_LEX::update_used_tables after merging mergeable views and derived tables into the main query. The leaf tables of resulting query may change their bitmap numbers after this merge. That's why the not_null_tables_cache bitmaps must be updated. Due to the bug mentioned above the result of the re-evaluation of the not_null_tables_cache turned out to be incorrect in some cases. This could trigger an invalid conversion of outer joins into inner joins leading to invalid query result sets. Also removed an implicit conversion from int to bool in the function SELECT_LEX::update_used_tables.
-
- 10 Jul, 2011 6 commits
-
-
Vladislav Vaintroub authored
-
Vladislav Vaintroub authored
-
Vladislav Vaintroub authored
-
Vladislav Vaintroub authored
-
Vladislav Vaintroub authored
-
Igor Babaev authored
The value of THD::used tables should be re-evaluated after merges of views and derived tables into the main query. Now it's done in the function SELECT_LEX::update_used_tables. The re-evaluation of the 'used_table' bitmaps for the items in HAVING, GROUP BY and ORDER BY clauses has been added as well.
-
- 09 Jul, 2011 3 commits
-
-
Sergey Petrunya authored
Semi-join fixes: make COST_VECT objects survive add_io(add_io_cnt=0, add_avg_cost=...) calls without getting NaN in internal fields.
-
Sergey Petrunya authored
-
Sergey Petrunya authored
-
- 08 Jul, 2011 9 commits
-
-
Igor Babaev authored
-
Igor Babaev authored
The bug was caused by an incorrect code of the function Item_direct_view_ref::replace_equal_field introduced in the patch for bugs 717577, 724942. The function erroneously returned the wrapped field instead of the Item_direct_view_ref object itself in the cases when no replacement happened. The bug masked two other minor bugs that could result in not quite correct output of the EXPLAIN command for some queries. They were fixed in the patch as well.
-
Sergey Petrunya authored
-
Sergey Petrunya authored
-
Sergey Petrunya authored
- Scavenged subquery tests from testcases other than t/subselect*.test and put them into single file
-
Sergey Petrunya authored
- Set the default - Adjust the testcases so that 'new' tests are run with optimizations turned on. - Pull out relevant tests from "irrelevant" tests and run them with optimizations on. - Run range.test and innodb.test with both mrr=on and mrr=off
-
unknown authored
-
unknown authored
The bug itself has been fixed by MWL#89.
-
unknown authored
The bug itself has been fixed by MWL#89.
-
- 07 Jul, 2011 4 commits
-
-
Igor Babaev authored
-
Igor Babaev authored
The offending query returns a wrong result set because the optimizer erroneously eliminated the where condition evaluated it to TRUE. The cause of this wrong transformation was that the flag maybe_null for an inner table of the outer join was not set to TRUE after the table had replaced the wrapping view. Now the function SELECT_LEX::update_used_tables resets the value of the maybe_null flag for each leaf table of the query after all merges of views have been done.
-
unknown authored
The bug itself has been fixed by MWL#89.
-
unknown authored
The bug itself has been fixed by MWL#89.
-