- 26 May, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
InnoDB shutdown assumes that once the server has entered SRV_SHUTDOWN_FLUSH_PHASE, no change to persistent data is allowed. It was possible for the master thread to wake up while shutdown is executing in SRV_SHUTDOWN_FLUSH_PHASE or even in SRV_SHUTDOWN_LAST_PHASE. We do not yet know if further crashes at shutdown are possible. Also, we do not know if all the observed crashes could be explained by the race conditions that we are now fixing. srv_shutdown_print_master_pending(): Remove a redundant ut_time() call. srv_shutdown(): Renamed from srv_master_do_shutdown_tasks(). srv_master_thread(): Do not resume after shutdown has been initiated.
-
- 23 May, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Daniel Bartholomew authored
-
Vladislav Vaintroub authored
-
- 19 May, 2017 6 commits
-
-
Sergei Golubchik authored
-
Sergei Golubchik authored
-
Sergei Golubchik authored
fix incorrect merge, 831b5318 was not fully merged into 10.0
-
Sergei Golubchik authored
uploaded 10.0, analyzed everything with the Impact=High (and a couple of Medium)
-
Sachin Setiya authored
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
In a merge conflict resolution, callers of the added function rec_field_len_in_chars() were removed, but the function itself was not.
-
- 18 May, 2017 10 commits
-
-
Oleksandr Byelkin authored
-
Vicențiu Ciorbaru authored
-
Vicențiu Ciorbaru authored
-
Vicențiu Ciorbaru authored
-
Sachin Setiya authored
Problem:- This crash happens because logged stmt is quite big and while writing Annotate_rows_log_event it throws EFBIG error but we ignore this error and do not call cache_data->set_incident(). Solution:- When we normally write Binlog_log_event we check for error EFBIG, but we did do this for Annotate_rows_log_event. We check for this error and call cache_data->set_incident() accordingly. # Conflicts: # sql/log.cc
-
Oleksandr Byelkin authored
-
Elena Stepanova authored
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
This fixes warnings that were emitted when running InnoDB test suites on a debug server that was compiled with GCC 7.1.0 using the flags -O3 -fsanitize=undefined. thd_requested_durability(): XtraDB can call this with trx->mysql_thd=NULL. Remove the function in InnoDB, because it is not used there. calc_row_difference(): Do not call memcmp(o_ptr, NULL, 0). innobase_index_name_is_reserved(): This can be called with key_info=NULL, num_of_keys=0. innobase_dropping_foreign(), innobase_check_foreigns_low(), innobase_check_foreigns(): This can be called with drop_fk=NULL, n_drop_fk=0. rec_convert_dtuple_to_rec_comp(): Do not invoke memcpy(end, NULL, 0).
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
On 64-bit systems, the constant 1 would be 32-bit (int or unsigned) by default. Cast the constant to ulint before shifting to avoid a -fsanitize=undefined warning or any potential overflow.
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
Fix a -fsanitizer=undefined warning that trx_undo_report_row_operation() was being passed thr=NULL when the BTR_NO_UNDO_LOG_FLAG flag was set. trx_undo_report_row_operation(): Remove the first two parameters. The parameter clust_entry!=NULL distinguishes inserts from updates. This should be a non-functional change (no observable change in behaviour; slightly smaller code).
-
- 17 May, 2017 19 commits
-
-
Igor Babaev authored
This is another correction of the patch for bug mdev-12670. If a derived table is merged into a select with STRAIGHT_JOIN modifier all IN subquery predicates contained in the specification of the derived table cannot be subject to conversion to semi-joins.
-
Igor Babaev authored
This patch is a correction of the patch for bug mdev-12670. With the current code handling semi-joins the following must be taken into account. Conversion of an IN subquery predicate into semi-join has to be blocked if the predicate occurs: (a) in the ON expression of an outer join (b) in the ON expression of an inner join embedded directly or indirectly in the inner nest of an outer join. The patch for mdev-12670 blocked conversion to semi-joins only in the case (a), but not in the case (b). This patch blocks the conversion in both cases.
-
Vicențiu Ciorbaru authored
-
Vicențiu Ciorbaru authored
-
Vicențiu Ciorbaru authored
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
Allocate srv_sys statically so that the desired alignment can be guaranteed. This silences -fsanitize=undefined warnings. There probably is no performance impact of this, because the reason for the alignment to ensure the absence of false sharing between counters. Even with the misalignment, each counter would have been been aligned at 64 bits, and the counters would reside in separate cache lines.
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
The parameter thr of the function btr_cur_optimistic_insert() is not declared as nonnull, but GCC 7.1.0 with -O3 is wrongly optimizing away the first part of the condition UNIV_UNLIKELY(thr && thr_get_trx(thr)->fake_changes) when the function is being called by row_merge_insert_index_tuples() with thr==NULL. The fake_changes is an XtraDB addition. This GCC bug only appears to have an impact on XtraDB, not InnoDB. We work around the problem by not attempting to dereference thr when both BTR_NO_LOCKING_FLAG and BTR_NO_UNDO_LOG_FLAG are set in the flags. Probably BTR_NO_LOCKING_FLAG alone should suffice. btr_cur_optimistic_insert(), btr_cur_pessimistic_insert(), btr_cur_pessimistic_update(): Correct comments that disagree with usage and with nonnull attributes. No other parameter than thr can actually be NULL. row_ins_duplicate_error_in_clust(): Remove an unused parameter. innobase_is_fake_change(): Unused function; remove. ibuf_insert_low(), row_log_table_apply(), row_log_apply(), row_undo_mod_clust_low(): Because we will be passing BTR_NO_LOCKING_FLAG | BTR_NO_UNDO_LOG_FLAG in the flags, the trx->fake_changes flag will be treated as false, which is the right thing to do at these low-level operations (change buffer merge, ALTER TABLE…LOCK=NONE, or ROLLBACK). This might be fixing actual XtraDB bugs. Other callers that pass these two flags are also passing thr=NULL, implying fake_changes=false. (Some callers in ROLLBACK are passing BTR_NO_LOCKING_FLAG and a nonnull thr. In these callers, fake_changes better be false, to avoid corruption.)
-
Vicențiu Ciorbaru authored
Post xtradb 5.6.36 merge the output has changed.
-
Vicențiu Ciorbaru authored
-
Vicențiu Ciorbaru authored
This merge reverts commit 6ca4f693c1ce472e2b1bf7392607c2d1124b4293 from current 5.6.36 innodb. Bug #23481444 OPTIMISER CALL ROW_SEARCH_MVCC() AND READ THE INDEX APPLIED BY UNCOMMITTED ROW Problem: ======== row_search_for_mysql() does whole table traversal for range query even though the end range is passed. Whole table traversal happens when the record is not with in transaction read view. Solution: ========= Convert the innodb last record of page to mysql format and compare with end range if the traversal of row_search_mvcc() exceeds 100, no ICP involved. If it is out of range then InnoDB can avoid the whole table traversal. Need to refactor the code little bit to make it compile. Reviewed-by: Jimmy Yang <jimmy.yang@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Knut Hatlen <knut.hatlen@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Shulga <dmitry.shulga@oracle.com> RB: 14660
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
The parameter path can be passed as NULL. This error was reported by GCC 7.1.0 when compiling CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug with -O3.
-
Vicențiu Ciorbaru authored
This reverts commit 4799af09. Upstream provided adequate fix. This commit is no longer necessary.
-
Vicențiu Ciorbaru authored
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
The macro UT_LIST_INIT() zero-initializes the UT_LIST_NODE. There is no need to call this macro on a buffer that has already been zero-initialized by mem_zalloc() or mem_heap_zalloc() or similar. For some reason, the statement UT_LIST_INIT(srv_sys->tasks) in srv_init() caused a SIGSEGV on server startup when compiling with GCC 7.1.0 for AMD64 using -O3. The zero-initialization was attempted by the instruction movaps %xmm0,0x50(%rax), while the proper offset of srv_sys->tasks would seem to have been 0x48.
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
Do not silence uncertain cases, or fix any bugs. The only functional change should be that ha_federated::extra() is not calling DBUG_PRINT to report an unhandled case for HA_EXTRA_PREPARE_FOR_DROP.
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
-
- 16 May, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Igor Babaev authored
When an IN subquery predicate was converted to a semi-join that were materialized and the result of the materialization happened to be the last in the execution plan then any conjunctive condition with RAND() turned out to be lost. Fixed by attaching this condition to the last top base table.
-
Vicențiu Ciorbaru authored
The feature is too dangerous for a stable version.
-