1. 10 May, 2011 1 commit
  2. 04 May, 2011 1 commit
  3. 02 May, 2011 2 commits
  4. 29 Apr, 2011 5 commits
  5. 27 Apr, 2011 3 commits
  6. 26 Apr, 2011 3 commits
  7. 25 Apr, 2011 1 commit
  8. 23 Apr, 2011 1 commit
  9. 22 Apr, 2011 1 commit
    • Sergey Glukhov's avatar
      Bug#11756928 48916: SERVER INCORRECTLY PROCESSING HAVING CLAUSES WITH AN ORDER BY CLAUSE · 76f37a02
      Sergey Glukhov authored
      Before sorting HAVING condition is split into two parts,
      first part is a table related condition and the rest of is
      HAVING part. Extraction of HAVING part does not take into account
      the fact that some of conditions might be non-const but
      have 'used_tables' == 0 (independent subqueries)
      and because of that these conditions are cut off by
      make_cond_for_table() function.
      The fix is to use (table_map) 0 instead of used_tables in
      third argument for make_cond_for_table() function.
      It allows to extract elements which belong to sorted
      table and in addition elements which are independend
      subqueries.
      76f37a02
  10. 21 Apr, 2011 1 commit
  11. 20 Apr, 2011 6 commits
  12. 18 Apr, 2011 4 commits
  13. 16 Apr, 2011 1 commit
  14. 15 Apr, 2011 3 commits
  15. 14 Apr, 2011 4 commits
  16. 13 Apr, 2011 1 commit
  17. 12 Apr, 2011 2 commits