- 31 Aug, 2007 9 commits
-
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-30712
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
-
anozdrin/alik@ibm.opbmk authored
-
anozdrin/alik@ibm.opbmk authored
into ibm.opbmk:/home/alik/Documents/MySQL/devel/5.1-rt-bug25843
-
anozdrin/alik@ibm.opbmk authored
of statement breaks binlog. There were two problems discovered by this bug: 1. Default (current) database is not fixed at the creation time. That leads to wrong output of DATABASE() function. 2. Database attributes (@@collation_database) are not fixed at the creation time. That leads to wrong resultset. Binlog breakage and Query Cache wrong output happened because of the first problem. The fix is to remember the current database at the PREPARE-time and set it each time at EXECUTE.
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-cleanup
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
-
kostja@bodhi.(none) authored
into bodhi.(none):/opt/local/work/mysql-5.1-12713-new
-
kostja@bodhi.(none) authored
API instead. This is a pre-requisite of the fix for Bug 12713, which changes the data type of thd->ha_data from void * to struct Ha_data.
-
- 30 Aug, 2007 16 commits
-
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt50-merge
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt50-merge
-
davi@moksha.local authored
-
davi@moksha.local authored
into moksha.local:/Users/davi/mysql/push/bugs/28587-5.1
-
davi@moksha.local authored
The problem is that a SELECT on one thread is blocked by INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE on another thread even when low_priority_updates is activated. The solution is to possibly downgrade the lock type to the setting of low_priority_updates if the INSERT cannot be concurrent.
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt50-merge
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
comments) This change set is for 5.1 (manually merged) Before this fix, the server would accept queries that contained comments, even when the comments were not properly closed with a '*' '/' marker. For example, select 1 /* + 2 <EOF> would be accepted as select 1 /* + 2 */ <EOF> and executed as select 1 With this fix, the server now rejects queries with unclosed comments as syntax errors. Both regular comments ('/' '*') and special comments ('/' '*' '!') must be closed with '*' '/' to be parsed correctly.
-
kostja@bodhi.(none) authored
generated so many warnings that the mode was unusable.
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt50-merge
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-28779-b
-
anozdrin/alik@ibm.opbmk authored
PREPARE and EXECUTE of statement breaks binlog.
-
kaa@polly.(none) authored
into polly.(none):/home/kaa/src/bug30164/my51-bug30164
-
kaa@polly.(none) authored
Use double quotes instead of single ones which make the test fail on Windows. This is for bug #30164.
-
kaa@polly.(none) authored
into polly.(none):/home/kaa/src/bug30164/my51-bug30164
-
kaa@polly.(none) authored
Problem: In cases when a client-side macro appears inside a server-side comment, the add_line() function in mysql.cc discarded all characters until the next delimiter to remove macro arguments from the query string. This resulted in broken queries being sent to the server when the next delimiter character appeared past the comment's boundaries, because the comment closing sequence ('*/') was discarded. Fix: If a client-side macro appears inside a server-side comment, discard all characters in the comment after the macro (that is, until the end of the comment rather than the next delimiter). This is a minimal fix to allow only simple cases used by the mysqlbinlog utility. Limitations that are worth documenting: - Nested server-side and/or client-side comments are not supported by mysql.cc - Using client-side macros in multi-line server-side comments is not supported - All characters after a client-side macro in a server-side comment will be omitted from the query string (and thus, will not be sent to server).
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
failures) Fixed open_performance_schema_table() and close_performance_schema_table() implementation and callers, to always execute balanced calls to: thd->reset_n_backup_open_tables_state(backup); thd->restore_backup_open_tables_state(backup);
-
- 29 Aug, 2007 8 commits
-
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt50-merge
-
davi@moksha.local authored
-
brian@piggy.tangent.org authored
-
davi@moksha.local authored
into moksha.local:/Users/davi/mysql/push/bugs/30632-5.1
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
comments) Before this fix, the server would accept queries that contained comments, even when the comments were not properly closed with a '*' '/' marker. For example, select 1 /* + 2 <EOF> would be accepted as select 1 /* + 2 */ <EOF> and executed as select 1 With this fix, the server now rejects queries with unclosed comments as syntax errors. Both regular comments ('/' '*') and special comments ('/' '*' '!') must be closed with '*' '/' to be parsed correctly.
-
davi@moksha.local authored
Bug#21422 GRANT/REVOKE possible inside stored function, probably in a trigger Bug#17244 GRANT gives strange error message when used in a stored function GRANT/REVOKE statements are non-transactional (no explicit transaction boundaries) in nature and hence are forbidden inside stored functions and triggers, but they weren't being effectively forbidden. Furthermore, the absence of implict commits makes changes made by GRANT/REVOKE statements to not be rolled back. The implemented fix is to issue a implicit commit with every GRANT/REVOKE statement, effectively prohibiting these statements in stored functions and triggers. The implicit commit also fixes the replication bug, and looks like being in concert with the behavior of DDL and administrative statements. Since this is a incompatible change, the following sentence should be added to the Manual in the very end of the 3rd paragraph, subclause 13.4.3 "Statements That Cause an Implicit Commit": "Beginning with MySQL 5.0.??, the GRANT and REVOKE statements cause an implicit commit." Patch contributed by Vladimir Shebordaev
-
anozdrin/alik@ibm. authored
seems to be converted as varbinary. The bug has been already fixed. This CS just adds a test case for it.
-
- 28 Aug, 2007 5 commits
-
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt50-merge
-
davi@moksha.local authored
into moksha.local:/Users/davi/mysql/push/mysql-5.0-runtime
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt50-merge
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
This is a performance bug, affecting in particular the bison generated code for the parser. Prior to this fix, the grammar used a long chain of reduces to parse an expression, like: bit_expr -> bit_term bit_term -> bit_factor bit_factor -> value_expr value_expr -> term term -> factor etc This chain of reduces cause the internal state automaton in the generated parser to execute more state transitions and more reduces, so that the generated MySQLParse() function would spend a lot of time looping to execute all the grammar reductions. With this patch, the grammar has been reorganized so that rules are more "flat", limiting the depth of reduces needed to parse <expr>. Tests have been written to enforce that relative priorities and properties of operators have not changed while changing the grammar. See the bug report for performance data.
-
- 27 Aug, 2007 2 commits
-
-
baker@bk-internal.mysql.com authored
into bk-internal.mysql.com:/data0/bk/mysql-5.1-arch
-
davi@moksha.local authored
If, after the tables are locked, one of the conditions to read from a HANDLER table is not met, the handler code wrongly jumps to a error path that won't unlock the tables. The user-visible effect is that after a error in a handler read command, all subsequent handler operations on the same table will hang. The fix is simply to correct the code to jump to the (same) error path that unlocks the tables.
-