1. 04 Mar, 2014 1 commit
  2. 03 Dec, 2013 1 commit
  3. 04 Nov, 2013 2 commits
  4. 01 Nov, 2013 1 commit
  5. 31 Oct, 2013 2 commits
    • unknown's avatar
      No commit message · e87a37a2
      unknown authored
      No commit message
      e87a37a2
    • Venkata Sidagam's avatar
      Bug #12917164 DROP USER CAN'T DROP USERS WITH LEGACY · 19990c92
      Venkata Sidagam authored
          UPPER CASE HOST NAME ANYMORE
      
      Description:
      It is not possible to drop users with host names with upper case
      letters in them. i.e DROP USER 'root'@'Tmp_Host_Name'; is failing
      with error.
      
      Analysis: Since the fix 11748570 we came up with lower case hostnames
      as standard. But in the current bug the hostname is created by
      mysql_install_db script is still having upper case hostnames. 
      So, if we have the hostname with upper case letters like(Tmp_Host_Name)
      then we will have as it is stored in the mysql.user table. 
      In this case if use "'DROP USER 'root'@'Tmp_Host_Name';" it gives 
      error because we do compare with the lower case of hostname since the 
      11748570 fix.
      
      Fix: We need to convert the hostname to lower case before storing into 
      the mysql.user table when we run the mysql_install_db script.
      19990c92
  6. 30 Oct, 2013 1 commit
  7. 29 Oct, 2013 1 commit
  8. 18 Oct, 2013 1 commit
    • Aditya A's avatar
      Bug#17559867 AFTER REBUILDING,A MYISAM PARTITION ENDS UP · cd6f3b55
      Aditya A authored
                   AS A INNODB PARTITTION.
      
      PROBLEM
      -------
      The correct engine_type was not being set during 
      rebuild of the partition due to which the handler
      was always created with the default engine,
      which is innodb for 5.5+ ,therefore even if the
      table was myisam, after rebuilding the partitions
      ended up as innodb partitions.
      
      FIX
      ---
      Set the correct engine type during rebuild.  
      
      [Approved by mattiasj #rb3599]
      cd6f3b55
  9. 16 Oct, 2013 2 commits
    • Venkatesh Duggirala's avatar
      Bug#17234370 LAST_INSERT_ID IS REPLICATED INCORRECTLY IF · 2b07397b
      Venkatesh Duggirala authored
      REPLICATION FILTERS ARE USED.
      
      Problem:
      When Filtered-slave applies Int_var_log_event and when it
      tries to write the event to its own binlog, LAST_INSERT_ID
      value is written wrongly.
      
      Analysis:
      THD::stmt_depends_on_first_successful_insert_id_in_prev_stmt
      is a variable which is set when LAST_INSERT_ID() is used by
      a statement. If it is set, first_successful_insert_id_in_
      prev_stmt_for_binlog will be stored in the statement-based
      binlog. This variable is CUMULATIVE along the execution of
      a stored function or trigger: if one substatement sets it
      to 1 it will stay 1 until the function/trigger ends,
      thus making sure that first_successful_insert_id_in_
      prev_stmt_for_binlog does not change anymore and is
      propagated to the caller for binlogging. This is achieved
      using the following code
      if(!stmt_depends_on_first_successful_insert_id_in_prev_stmt)               
      {                                                                           
        /* It's the first time we read it */                                      
        first_successful_insert_id_in_prev_stmt_for_binlog=                       
        first_successful_insert_id_in_prev_stmt;                                
        stmt_depends_on_first_successful_insert_id_in_prev_stmt= 1;               
      }
      
      Slave server, after receiving Int_var_log_event event from
      master, it is setting
      stmt_depends_on_first_successful_insert_id_in_prev_stmt
      to true(*which is wrong*) and not setting
      first_successful_insert_id_in_prev_stmt_for_binlog. Because
      of this problem, when the actual DML statement with
      LAST_INSERT_ID() is parsed by slave SQL thread,
      first_successful_insert_id_in_prev_stmt_for_binlog is not
      set. Hence the value zero (default value) is written to
      slave's binlog.
      
      Why only *Filtered slave* is effected when the code is
      in common place:
      -------------------------------------------------------
      In Query_log_event::do_apply_event,
      THD::stmt_depends_on_first_successful_insert_id_in_prev_stmt
      is reset to zero at the end of the function. In case of
      normal slave (No Filters), this variable will be reset. 
      In Filtered slave, Slave SQL thread defers all IRU events's
      execution until IRU's Query_log event is received. Once it
      receives Query_log_event it executes all pending IRU events
      and then it executes Query_log_event. Hence the variable is
      not getting reset to 0, causing this bug.
      
      Fix: As described above, the root cause was setting 
      THD::stmt_depends_on_first_successful_insert_id_in_prev_stmt
      when Int_var_log_event was executed by a SQL thread. Hence
      removing the problematic line from the code.
      2b07397b
    • Venkata Sidagam's avatar
      Bug#16900358 FIX FOR CVE-2012-5611 IS INCOMPLETE · de0e8a02
      Venkata Sidagam authored
      Description: Fix for bug CVE-2012-5611 (bug 67685) is 
      incomplete. The ACL_KEY_LENGTH-sized buffers in acl_get() and 
      check_grant_db() can be overflown by up to two bytes. That's 
      probably not enough to do anything more serious than crashing 
      mysqld.
      Analysis: In acl_get() when "copy_length" is calculated it 
      just adding the variable lengths. But when we are using them 
      with strmov() we are adding +1 to each. This will lead to a 
      three byte buffer overflow (i.e two +1's at strmov() and one 
      byte for the null added by strmov() function). Similarly it 
      happens for check_grant_db() function as well.
      Fix: We need to add "+2" to "copy_length" in acl_get() 
      and "+1" to "copy_length" in check_grant_db(). 
      de0e8a02
  10. 14 Oct, 2013 1 commit
    • Nuno Carvalho's avatar
      WL#7266: Dump-thread additional concurrency tests ... · 3399194c
      Nuno Carvalho authored
      WL#7266: Dump-thread additional concurrency tests                                                                                                                           
      
      This worklog aims at testing the two following scenarios:
      
      1) Whenever the mysql_binlog_send method (dump thread)
      reaches the end of file when reading events from the binlog, before
      checking if it should wait for more events, there was a test to
      check if the file being read was still active, i.e, it was the last
      known binlog. However, it was possible that something was written to
      the binary log and then a rotation would happen, after EOF was
      detected and before the check for active was performed. In this
      case, the end of the binary log would not be read by the dump
      thread, and this would cause the slave to lose updates.
      This test verifies that the problem has been fixed. It waits during
      this window while forcing a rotation in the binlog.
      
      2) Verify dump thread can send events in active file, correctly after
      encountering an IO error.
      3399194c
  11. 07 Oct, 2013 2 commits
  12. 04 Oct, 2013 1 commit
  13. 27 Sep, 2013 1 commit
  14. 20 Sep, 2013 1 commit
  15. 12 Sep, 2013 1 commit
  16. 11 Sep, 2013 1 commit
    • Satya Bodapati's avatar
      Bug#16752251 - INNODB DOESN'T REDO-LOG INSERT BUFFER MERGE OPERATION IF · 59402fe0
      Satya Bodapati authored
      	       IT IS DONE IN-PLACE
      
      With change buffer enabled, InnoDB doesn't write a transaction log
      record when it merges a record from the insert buffer to an secondary
      index page if the insertion is performed as an update-in-place.
      
      Fixed by logging the 'update-in-place' operation on secondary index
      pages.
      
      Approved by Marko. rb#2429
      59402fe0
  17. 10 Sep, 2013 3 commits
    • mithun's avatar
      Bug #16978278 : BUFFER OVERFLOW WHEN PRINTING A LARGE 64-BIT INTEGER · 42501173
      mithun authored
                      WITH MY_B_VPRINTF()
      Issue         : In LP 64 machine max long value can be 20 digit
                      decimal value. But in my_b_vprintf() the intermediate
                      buffer storage used is 17 bytes length. This will lead to
                      buffer overflow.
      Solution      : Increased the buffer storage from 17 to 32 bytes.
                      code is backported from 5.6
      
      
      mysys/mf_iocache2.c:
        In function my_b_vprintf increased the size of local buff from 17 to
        32 bytes.
      42501173
    • Libing Song's avatar
      Bug#17402313 DUMP THREAD SENDS SOME EVENTS MORE THAN ONCE · aff9f262
      Libing Song authored
      Postfix, suppress the new warning generated by the bug's fix.
      aff9f262
    • Libing Song's avatar
      Bug#17402313 DUMP THREAD SENDS SOME EVENTS MORE THAN ONCE · 514b8261
      Libing Song authored
      Dump thread may encounter an error when reading events from the active binlog
      file. However the errors may be temporary, so dump thread will try to read
      the event again. But dump thread seeked to an wrong position, it caused some
      events was sent twice.
      
      To fix the bug, prev_pos is defined out the while loop and is set the correct
      position after reading every event correctly.
      
      This patch also make binlog_can_be_corrupted more accurate, only the binlogs
      not closed normally are marked binlog_can_be_corrupted.
      
      Finally, two warnings are added when dump threads encounter the temporary
      errors.
      514b8261
  18. 09 Sep, 2013 3 commits
  19. 03 Sep, 2013 1 commit
  20. 30 Aug, 2013 2 commits
  21. 29 Aug, 2013 1 commit
  22. 28 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • Raghav Kapoor's avatar
      BUG#17294150-POTENTIAL CRASH DUE TO BUFFER OVERRUN IN SSL · 881e61db
      Raghav Kapoor authored
                   ERROR HANDLING CODE 
      
      BACKGROUND:
      There can be a potential crash due to buffer overrun in 
      SSL error handling code due to missing comma in
      ssl_error_string[] array in viosslfactories.c.
      
      ANALYSIS:
      Found by code Inspection.
      
      FIX:
      Added the missing comma in SSL error handling code
      in ssl_error_string[] array in viosslfactories.c.
      881e61db
  23. 26 Aug, 2013 1 commit
  24. 23 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • Neeraj Bisht's avatar
      Bug#17029399 - CRASH IN ITEM_REF::FIX_FIELDS WITH TRIGGER ERRORS · 356b6414
      Neeraj Bisht authored
      Problem:-
      In a Procedure, when we are comparing value of select query 
      with IN clause and they both have different collation, cause 
      error on first time execution and assert second time.
      procedure will have query like
      set @x = ((select a from t1) in (select d from t2));<---proc1
                    sel1                   sel2
      
      Analysis:-
      When we execute this proc1(first time)
      While resolving the fields of user variable, we will call 
      Item_in_subselect::fix_fields while will resolve sel2. There 
      in Item_in_subselect::select_transformer, we evaluate the 
      left expression(sel1) and store it in Item_cache_* object 
      (to avoid re-evaluating it many times during subquery execution) 
      by making Item_in_optimizer class.
      While evaluating left expression we will prepare sel1.
      After that, we will put a new condition in sel2  
      in Item_in_subselect::select_transformer() which will compare 
      t2.d and sel1(which is cached in Item_in_optimizer).
      
      Later while checking the collation in agg_item_collations() 
      we get error and we cleanup the item. While cleaning up we cleaned 
      the cached value in Item_in_optimizer object.
      
      When we execute the procedure second time, we have condition for 
      sel2 and while setup_cond(), we can't able to find reference item 
      as it is cleanup while item cleanup.So it assert.
      
      
      Solution:-
      We should not cleanup the cached value for Item_in_optimizer object, 
      if we have put the condition to subselect.
      
      
      356b6414
  25. 21 Aug, 2013 4 commits
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Merge working copy to mysql-5.1. · 5f40624c
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      5f40624c
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Merge mysql-5.1 to working copy. · e7263062
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      e7263062
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Bug#12560151 61132: infinite loop in buf_page_get_gen() when handling · ec2389dc
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      compressed pages
      
      After loading a compressed-only page in buf_page_get_gen() we allocate a new
      block for decompression. The problem is that the compressed page is neither
      buffer-fixed nor I/O-fixed by the time we call buf_LRU_get_free_block(),
      so it may end up being evicted and returned back as a new block.
      
      buf_page_get_gen(): Temporarily buffer-fix the compressed-only block
      while allocating memory for an uncompressed page frame.
      This should prevent this form of the infinite loop, which is more likely
      with a small innodb_buffer_pool_size.
      
      rb#2511 approved by Jimmy Yang, Sunny Bains
      ec2389dc
    • Praveenkumar Hulakund's avatar
      Bug#11765252 - READ OF FREED MEMORY WHEN "USE DB" AND · 3b1e98d2
      Praveenkumar Hulakund authored
                     "SHOW PROCESSLIST"
      
      Analysis:
      ----------
      The problem here is, if one connection changes its
      default db and at the same time another connection executes
      "SHOW PROCESSLIST", when it wants to read db of the another
      connection then there is a chance of accessing the invalid
      memory. 
      
      The db name stored in THD is not guarded while changing user
      DB and while reading the user DB in "SHOW PROCESSLIST".
      So, if THD.db is freed by thd "owner" thread and if another
      thread executing "SHOW PROCESSLIST" statement tries to read
      and copy THD.db at the same time then we may endup in the issue
      reported here.
      
      Fix:
      ----------
      Used mutex "LOCK_thd_data" to guard THD.db while freeing it
      and while copying it to processlist.
      3b1e98d2
  26. 16 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Bug#17312846 CHECK TABLE ASSERTION FAILURE · fb2a2d25
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      DICT_TABLE_GET_FORMAT(CLUST_INDEX->TABLE) >= 1
      
      The function row_sel_sec_rec_is_for_clust_rec() was incorrectly
      preparing to compare a NULL column prefix in a secondary index with a
      non-NULL column in a clustered index.
      
      This can trigger an assertion failure in 5.1 plugin and later. In the
      built-in InnoDB of MySQL 5.1 and earlier, we would apparently only do
      some extra work, by trimming the clustered index field for the
      comparison.
      
      The code might actually have worked properly apart from this debug
      assertion failure. It is merely doing some extra work in fetching a
      BLOB column, and then comparing it to NULL (which would return the
      same result, no matter what the BLOB contents is).
      
      While the test case involves CHECK TABLE, this could theoretically
      occur during any read that uses a secondary index on a column prefix
      of a column that can be NULL.
      
      rb#3101 approved by Mattias Jonsson
      fb2a2d25
  27. 15 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Bug#17302896 DOUBLE PURGE ON ROLLBACK OF UPDATING A DELETE-MARKED RECORD · 31809607
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      There was a race condition in the rollback of TRX_UNDO_UPD_DEL_REC.
      
      Once row_undo_mod_clust() has rolled back the changes by the rolling-back
      transaction, it attempts to purge the delete-marked record, if possible, in a
      separate mini-transaction.
      
      However, row_undo_mod_remove_clust_low() fails to check if the DB_TRX_ID of
      the record that it found after repositioning the cursor, is still the same.
      If it is not, it means that the record was purged and another record was
      inserted in its place.
      
      So, the rollback would have performed an incorrect purge, breaking the
      locking rules and causing corruption.
      
      The problem was found by creating a table that contains a unique
      secondary index and a primary key, and two threads running REPLACE
      with only one value for the unique column, so that the uniqueness
      constraint would be violated all the time, leading to statement
      rollback.
      
      This bug exists in all InnoDB versions (I checked MySQL 3.23.53).
      It has become easier to repeat in 5.5 and 5.6 thanks to scalability
      improvements and a dedicated purge thread.
      
      rb#3085 approved by Jimmy Yang
      31809607
  28. 14 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Bug#16971045 ASSERTION FAILURES ON ROLLBACK OF AN INSERT AFTER A · 300ac936
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      FAILED BLOB WRITE
      
      btr_store_big_rec_extern_fields(): Relax a debug assertion so that
      some BLOB pointers may remain zero if an error occurs.
      
      btr_free_externally_stored_field(), row_undo_ins(): Allow the BLOB
      pointer to be zero on any rollback.
      
      rb#3059 approved by Jimmy Yang, Kevin Lewis
      300ac936