- 04 Jul, 2006 2 commits
-
-
gkodinov@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/kgeorge/mysql/5.0/B16110
-
gkodinov@mysql.com authored
When compiling INSERT statements the check whether columns are provided values depends on the flag whether a field is used in that query (Field::query_id). However the check for updatability of VIEW columns (check_view_insertability()) was calling fix_fields() and thus setting the Field::query_id even for the view fields that are not referenced in the current INSERT statement. So the correct check for columns without default values ( check_that_all_fields_are_given_values() ) is assuming that all the VIEW columns were mentioned in the INSERT field list and was issuing no warnings or errors. Fixed check_view_insertability() to turn off the flag whether or not to set Field::query_id (THREAD::set_query_id) before calling fix fields and restore it when it's done.
-
- 29 Jun, 2006 36 commits
-
-
evgen@moonbone.local authored
-
evgen@moonbone.local authored
into moonbone.local:/work/merge-5.0
-
tomas@poseidon.ndb.mysql.com authored
into poseidon.ndb.mysql.com:/home/tomas/5.0-merge
-
tomas@poseidon.ndb.mysql.com authored
into poseidon.ndb.mysql.com:/home/tomas/5.0-merge
-
evgen@moonbone.local authored
into moonbone.local:/work/merge-4.1
-
tomas@poseidon.ndb.mysql.com authored
into poseidon.ndb.mysql.com:/home/tomas/mysql-4.1-main
-
tomas@poseidon.ndb.mysql.com authored
into poseidon.ndb.mysql.com:/home/tomas/mysql-5.0-main
-
tomas@poseidon.ndb.mysql.com authored
-
tomas@poseidon.ndb.mysql.com authored
into poseidon.ndb.mysql.com:/home/tomas/mysql-5.0-main
-
tomas@poseidon.ndb.mysql.com authored
into poseidon.ndb.mysql.com:/home/tomas/mysql-5.0
-
tomas@poseidon.ndb.mysql.com authored
-
tomas@poseidon.ndb.mysql.com authored
into poseidon.ndb.mysql.com:/home/tomas/5.0-merge
-
joerg@mysql.com authored
-
joerg@mysql.com authored
Re-apply a patch by Knielsen in the 5.0.23 build clone: Replace port number by "SLAVE_PORT".
-
joerg@mysql.com authored
-
konstantin@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/opt/local/work/mysql-5.0-runtime
-
lars@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/users/lthalmann/bkroot/mysql-5.0-release
-
konstantin@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/opt/local/work/mysql-5.0-runtime
-
konstantin@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/opt/local/work/mysql-5.0-runtime
-
konstantin@mysql.com authored
-
stewart@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/stewart/Documents/MySQL/4.1/main
-
lars@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/users/lthalmann/bk/MERGE/mysql-5.0-merge
-
lars@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/users/lthalmann/bkroot/mysql-5.0-release
-
stewart@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/stewart/Documents/MySQL/5.0/main
-
konstantin@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/opt/local/work/mysql-5.0-runtime
-
jonas@perch.ndb.mysql.com authored
into perch.ndb.mysql.com:/home/jonas/src/mysql-5.0-release
-
tomas@poseidon.ndb.mysql.com authored
into poseidon.ndb.mysql.com:/home/tomas/mysql-5.0-main
-
tomas@poseidon.ndb.mysql.com authored
into poseidon.ndb.mysql.com:/home/tomas/mysql-5.0-main
-
tomas@poseidon.ndb.mysql.com authored
+ adopted signal to be as close as possible to 5.1...
-
kroki@mysql.com authored
-
jonas@perch.ndb.mysql.com authored
Fix compile error for forte
-
knielsen@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/data0/knielsen/tmp-5.0
-
knielsen@mysql.com authored
-
knielsen@mysql.com authored
-
gkodinov@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/kgeorge/mysql/5.0/warnings
-
gkodinov@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/kgeorge/mysql/4.1/warnings
-
- 28 Jun, 2006 2 commits
-
-
kroki@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-5.0-bug10946
-
kroki@mysql.com authored
It was hard to distinguish case, when one was unable to create trigger on the table because trigger with same action time and event already existed for this table, from the case, when one tried to create trigger with name which was already occupied by some other trigger, since in both these cases we emitted ER_TRG_ALREADY_EXISTS error and message. Now we emit ER_NOT_SUPPORTED_YET error with appropriate additional message in the first case. There is no sense in introducing separate error for this situation since we plan to get rid of this limitation eventually.
-