- 05 Feb, 2010 3 commits
-
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
format.
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
Change the error code for ER_WARN_I_S_SKIPPED_TABLE, to not upset the tests that rely on ER_SLAVE_CONVERSION_ERROR error code = 1667. Fix a merge bug with binlogging of CREATE TABLE (temporary tables).
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
fix a merge bug when write_bin_log called from mysql_routine_grant() would chew up the error. rpl_do_grant test would fail on assert that the diagnostics area is empty.
-
- 04 Feb, 2010 7 commits
-
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
Make all mutexes and conditions of type mysql_mutex_t, mysql_cond_t, since it's now the expectation of THD::awake().
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
Cherry-pick a fix Bug#37148 from next-mr, to preserve file ids of the added files, and ensure that all the necessary changes have been pulled. Since initially Bug#37148 was null-merged into 6.0, the changeset that is now being cherry-picked was likewise null merged into next-4284. Now that Bug#37148 has been reapplied to 6.0, try to make it work with next-4284. This is also necessary to be able to pull other changes from 5.1-rep into next-4284. To resolve the merge issues use this changeset applied to 6.0: revid:jperkin@sun.com-20091216103628-ylhqf7s6yegui2t9 revno: 3776.1.1 committer: He Zhenxing <zhenxing.he@sun.com> branch nick: 6.0-codebase-bugfixing timestamp: Thu 2009-12-17 17:02:50 +0800 message: Fix merge problem with Bug#37148
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
-
Dmitry Lenev authored
Removed local variables which became unused when we have switched to new approach for CREATE TABLE LIKE (i.e. abondoned .FRM file copying) and were causing warnings during compilation.
-
Jon Olav Hauglid authored
This was a deadlock between ALTER TABLE and another DML statement (or LOCK TABLES ... READ). ALTER TABLE would wait trying to upgrade its lock to MDL_EXCLUSIVE and the DML statement would wait trying to acquire a TL_READ_NO_INSERT table level lock. This could happen if one connection first acquired a MDL_SHARED_READ lock on a table. In another connection ALTER TABLE is then started. ALTER TABLE eventually blocks trying to upgrade to MDL_EXCLUSIVE, but while holding a TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ table level lock. If the first connection then tries to acquire TL_READ_NO_INSERT, it will block and we have a deadlock since neither connection can proceed. This patch fixes the problem by allowing TL_READ_NO_INSERT locks to be granted if another connection holds TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ on the same table. This will allow the DML statement to proceed such that it eventually can release its MDL lock which in turn makes ALTER TABLE able to proceed. Note that TL_READ_NO_INSERT was already partially compatible with TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ as the latter would be granted if the former lock was held. This patch just makes the opposite true as well. Also note that since ALTER TABLE takes an upgradable MDL lock, there will be no starvation of ALTER TABLE statements by statements acquiring TL_READ or TL_READ_NO_INSERT. Test case added to lock_sync.test.
-
Dmitry Lenev authored
moving calculation of hash value when looking up MDL_lock objects in MDL_map out of critical section.
-
- 03 Feb, 2010 12 commits
-
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
-
Dmitry Lenev authored
type-of-operation-aware metadata locks and added a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem (this patch fixed bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table"). Removed unused and redundant method.
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
of the TABLE_LIST instance, which did not initialize the MDL request properly. Use init_one_table() to initialize the MDL request.
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
-
Jon Olav Hauglid authored
failed in open_ltable() The problem was too restrictive asserts that enforced that open_ltable() was called without any active HANDLERs, LOCK TABLES or global read locks. However, this can happen in several cases when opening system tables. The assert would, for example, be triggered when drop function was called from a connection with active HANDLERs as this would cause open_ltable() to be called for mysql.proc. The assert could also be triggered when using table-based general log (mysql.general_log). This patch removes the asserts since they will be triggered in several legitimate cases and because the asserts are no longer relevant due to changes in how locks are released. The patch also fixes set_needs_thr_lock_abort() that before ignored its parameter and always set the member variable to TRUE. Test case added to mdl_sync.test. Thanks to Dmitry Lenev for help with this bug!
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
Post merge fixes. In sys_vars tests suite, whenever we use LOCK TABLE WRITE, adjust to lock the subject table indirecty via a view, to ensure that there the desired lock conflict in thr_lock.c is still taking place. If locked directly in LOCK TABLES list, thr_lock.c does not get involved. Adjust the thread wait state names in information_schema.processlist.
-
Dmitry Lenev authored
m_tickets.front() == m_trans_sentinel'". Debug build of server crashed due to assert failure in MDL subsystem when one tried to execute multi-table REPAIR or OPTIMIZE in autocommit=0 mode. The assert failure occured when multi-table REPAIR or OPTIMIZE started processing of second table from its table list and tried to acquire upgradable metadata lock on this table. The cause of the assert failure were MDL locks left over from processing of previous table. It turned out that in autocommit=0 mode close_thread_tables() which happens at the end of table processing doesn't release metadata locks. This fix solves problem by releasing locks explicitly using MDL_context::release_trans_locks() call.
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
-
- 02 Feb, 2010 2 commits
-
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
Fix Bug#50555 "handler commands crash server in my_hash_first()" as a post-merge fix (the new handler tests are not passing otherwise). - in hash.c, don't call calc_hash if ! my_hash_inited(). - add tests and results for the test case for Bug#50555
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
-
- 01 Feb, 2010 6 commits
-
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
-
Dmitry Lenev authored
which implemented new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks and added a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem (this patch fixed bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table"). These hangs were caused by missing include of wait_condition.inc. This fix simply adds them.
-
Dmitry Lenev authored
caused by patch which implemented new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks and added a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem (this patch fixed bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table"). Crashes were caused by a race in MDL_context::try_acquire_lock(). This method added MDL_ticket to the list of granted tickets and released lock protecting list before setting MDL_ticket::m_lock. Thus some other thread was able to see ticket without properly set m_lock member for some short period of time. If this thread called method involving this member during this period crash happened. This fix ensures that MDL_ticket::m_lock is set in all cases when ticket is added to granted/pending lists in MDL_lock.
-
Konstantin Osipov authored
in a pointer arithmetics expression).
-
Dmitry Lenev authored
Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the MDL subsystem. Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before ALTER started. The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout. A transaction would start using the table and modify a few rows. Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on the modified records and get blocked on a row lock. The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get blocked on thr_lock.c lock. This situation of circular wait would only get resolved by a timeout. Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the problem of deadlocks occurring between different locking subsystems. In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared metadata lock to exclusive one. Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively. We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need to abort such transactions. The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than innodb_lock_wait_timeout. This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such deadlocks inside MDL. To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the object. This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all transactions which has updated the table to go away. This solves the second issue. Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary. Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by this patch: - From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock) wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to complete. - From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE (i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table to complete. As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE. - DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete. - Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock, not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement transactions even if these only use MyISAM: session 1: session 2: begin; update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write; -- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1 update t2 ... (ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK) - Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE was abandoned. LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE. SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in the wait queue. - We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses table t1, and issues: LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE; FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'), an error is produced. In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES, the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
-
- 21 Jan, 2010 2 commits
-
-
Dmitry Lenev authored
condition variable per context instead of one mutex and one conditional variable for the whole subsystem. This should increase concurrency in this subsystem. It also opens the way for further changes which are necessary to solve such bugs as bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter table". Two other notable changes done by this patch: - MDL subsystem no longer implicitly acquires global intention exclusive metadata lock when per-object metadata lock is acquired. Now this has to be done by explicit calls outside of MDL subsystem. - Instead of using separate MDL_context for opening system tables/tables for purposes of I_S we now create MDL savepoint in the main context before opening tables and rollback to this savepoint after closing them. This means that it is now possible to get ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error even not inside a transaction. This might happen in unlikely case when one runs DDL on one of system tables while also running DDL on some other tables. Cases when this ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error is not justified will be addressed by advanced deadlock detector for MDL subsystem which we plan to implement.
-
Alexander Nozdrin authored
-
- 20 Jan, 2010 4 commits
-
-
Luis Soares authored
in errmsg.txt. Kept the one in that matched the location in errmsg-utf8.txt, ie after ER_UNKNOWN_LOCALE.
-
Alexander Nozdrin authored
-
Alexander Nozdrin authored
-
Jon Olav Hauglid authored
Diagnostics_area::set_ok_status at PREPARE The problem occured during processing of stored routines. Routines are loaded from mysql.proc, parsed and put into the sp cache by sp_cache_routine(). The assert occured because the return value from sp_cache_routine() was not checked for top level CALLs. This meant that any errors during sp_cache_routine() went unoticed and triggered the assert when my_ok() was later called. This is a regression introduced by the patch for Bug#30977, only visible in source trees with MDL and using debug builds of the server. This patch fixes the problem by checking the return value from sp_cache_routine() for top level CALLs and propagating any errors similar to what is done for other calls to sp_cache_routine(). No test case added.
-
- 19 Jan, 2010 1 commit
-
-
Alexander Nozdrin authored
-
- 18 Jan, 2010 3 commits
-
-
Alexander Nozdrin authored
-
Alexander Nozdrin authored
-
Alexander Nozdrin authored
for regular PB builds.
-