Also, remove comparison lsn > flush/write lsn, prior to calling
log_write_up_to. The checks and early returns are part of this function.

The problem is that array binding uses net buffer to read parameters for each
execution while each execiting with RETURNING write in the same buffer.

Solution is to allocate new net buffer to avoid changing buffer we are reading
from.

This reverts commit f88d130e.

option which is called from mysql.server (extra_args).

Fix: change mysql.server script to use --defaults-extra-file instead of -e

Port the following patch from MySQL:

  commit 1b2e8ea269c80cb93cc79d8be934c40b1c58e947
  Author: Kailasnath Nagarkar <kailasnath.nagarkar@oracle.com>
  Date:   Fri Nov 30 16:43:13 2018 +0530

    Bug #20939184: INNODB: UNLOCK ROW COULD NOT FIND A 2 MODE
                   LOCK ON THE RECORD

    Issue:
    ------
    Consdier tables t1 and t2 such that t1 has multiple rows
    and join condition for t1 left join t2 results in only
    single row from t2.

    In this case, access to table t2 is const since there
    is a single row that qualifies the join condition.

    However, while executing the query, attempt is made to
    unlock t2's row multiple times.

    The current algorithm to fetch rows approximates to:
    1) Retrieve the row for t1.
    2) Retrieve the row for t2.
    3) Apply the join conditions.
       a) If condition evaluates to true:
          Project the row to the result.
       b) If condition evaluates to false:
          i) If t2's qep_tab->not_null_complement is true,
             unlock t2's row.
          ii) Null-complement the row by calling
              "evaluate_null_complemented_join_record()". In
              this function qep_tab->not_null_complement is
              set to false.

    The t2's only one row, that qualifies join condition,
    is unlocked in Step i) when t1's row is evaluated to
    false.
    When t1's next row is also evaluated to false, another
    attempt is made to unlock t2's already unlocked row.

    This results in following error being logged in error.log:

    "[ERROR] InnoDB: Unlock row could not find a 3 mode lock on
    the record. Current statement:
    select * from t1 left join t2 ......"

    Solution:
    ---------
    When a table's access method is "const", set record unlock
    method for this table to do no operation.

AIX grep doesn't support the grep -A syntax used
in the test case.

--skip-stack-trace isn't there on AIX.

buf_flush_relocate_on_flush_list(): Use dpage->physical_size()
because bpage->zip.ssize may already have been zeroed in
page_zip_set_size() invoked by buf_pool_t::realloc().

This would cause occasional failures of the test
innodb.innodb_buffer_pool_resize, which creates a
ROW_FORMAT=COMPRESSED table.

The replacement of buf_pool.page_hash with a different type of
hash table in commit 5155a300 (MDEV-22871)
introduced a race condition with buffer pool resizing.

We have an execution trace where buf_pool.page_hash.array is changed
to point to something else while page_hash_latch::read_lock() is
executing. The same should also affect page_hash_latch::write_lock().

We fix the race condition by never resizing (and reallocating) the
buf_pool.page_hash. We assume that resizing the buffer pool is
a rare operation. Yes, there might be a performance regression if a
server is first started up with a tiny buffer pool, which is later
enlarged. In that case, the tiny buf_pool.page_hash.array could cause
increased use of the hash bucket lists. That problem can be worked
around by initially starting up the server with a larger buffer pool
and then shrinking that, until changing to a larger size again.

buf_pool_t::resize_hash(): Remove.

buf_pool_t::page_hash_table::lock(): Do not attempt to deal with
hash table resizing. If we really wanted that in a safe manner,
we would probably have to introduce a global rw-lock around the
operation, or at the very least, poll buf_pool.resizing, both of
which would be detrimental to performance.

MDEV-23004 When using GROUP BY with JSON_ARRAYAGG with joint table, the square brackets are not included

make test results stable

followup for 98c7916f

In other ROW_FORMAT than REDUNDANT, the InnoDB record header
size calculation depends on dict_index_t::n_core_null_bytes.

In ROW_FORMAT=REDUNDANT, the record header always is 6 bytes
plus n_fields or 2*n_fields bytes, depending on the maximum
record size. But, during online ALTER TABLE, the log records
in the temporary file always use a format similar to
ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC, even omitting the 5-byte fixed-length part
of the header.

While creating a temporary file record for a ROW_FORMAT=REDUNDANT
table, InnoDB must refer to dict_index_t::n_nullable.
The field dict_index_t::n_core_null_bytes is only valid for
other than ROW_FORMAT=REDUNDANT tables.

The bug does not affect MariaDB 10.3, because only
commit 7a27db77 (MDEV-15563)
allowed an ALGORITHM=INSTANT change of a NOT NULL column to
NULL in a ROW_FORMAT=REDUNDANT table.

The fix was developed by Thirunarayanan Balathandayuthapani
and tested by Matthias Leich. The test case was simplified by me.

One more result was affected by merging
768c5188.

This is a backport of 161e4bfa.

trans_rollback_to_savepoint(): Only release metadata locks (MDL)
if the storage engines agree, after the changes were already rolled back.

Ever since commit 3792693f
and mysql/mysql-server@55ceedbc3feb911505dcba6cee8080d55ce86dda
we used to cheat here and always release MDL if the binlog is disabled.

MDL are supposed to prevent race conditions between DML and DDL also
when no replication is in use. MDL are supposed to be a superset of
InnoDB table locks: InnoDB table lock may only exist if the thread
also holds MDL on the table name.

In the included test case, ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT would wrongly release
the MDL on both tables and let ALTER TABLE proceed, even though the DML
transaction is actually holding locks on the table.

Until commit 1bd681c8 (MDEV-25506)
in MariaDB 10.6, InnoDB would often work around the locking violation
in a blatantly non-ACID way: If locks exist on a table that is being
dropped (in this case, actually a partition of a table that is being
rebuilt by ALTER TABLE), InnoDB could move the table (or partition)
into a queue, to be dropped after the locks and references had been
released. If the lock is not released and the original copy of the
table not dropped quickly enough, a name conflict could occur on
a subsequent ALTER TABLE.

The scenario of commit 3792693f
is unaffected by this fix, because mysqldump
would use non-locking reads, and the transaction would not be holding
any InnoDB locks during the execution of ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT.
MVCC reads inside InnoDB are only covered by MDL and page latches,
not by any table or record locks.

FIXME: It would be nice if storage engines were specifically asked
which MDL can be released, instead of only offering a choice
between all or nothing. InnoDB should be able to release any
locks for tables that are no longer in trx_t::mod_tables, except
if another transaction had converted some implicit record locks
to explicit ones, before the ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT had been completed.

Reviewed by: Sergei Golubchik

Fixup for commit 768c5188

A table rebuild that would truncate the default value of a
DATE column is expected to issue data truncation warnings.
But, these warnings are not being issued if the ADD COLUMN
is being executed with ALGORITHM=INSTANT. InnoDB sets the
warning of the field while assigning the default value
of the field during check_if_supported_inplace_alter().

The error loading the client module is different

Parital backport of 48938c57
so platform dependent AIX tests can be done.

C:\projects\server\sql\sql_show.cc(7913): error C2220: warning treated as error - no 'object' file generated [C:\projects\server\win_build\sql\sql.vcxproj]
C:\projects\server\sql\sql_show.cc(7913): warning C4267: 'initializing': conversion from 'size_t' to 'uint', possible loss of data [C:\projects\server\win_build\sql\sql.vcxproj]

caused by 768c5188

Parital backport of 48938c57
so platform dependent AIX tests can be done.

Post-merge fix in 10.4: add a testcase for pushdown into IN subquery

Consider a query of the form:

  select ... from (select item2 as COL1) as T where COL1=123

Condition pushdown into derived table will try to push "COL1=123" condition
down into table T.
The process of pushdown involves "substituting" the item, that is,
replacing Item_field("T.COL1") with its "producing item" item2.
In order to use item2, one needs to clone it (call Item::build_clone).

If the item is not cloneable (e.g. Item_func_sp is not), the pushdown
process will fail and nothing at all will be pushed.

Fixed by introducing transform_condition_or_part() which will try to apply
the transformation for as many parts of condition as possible. The parts of
condition that couldn't be transformed are dropped.