Commit 18e2977b authored by David Wilson's avatar David Wilson

docs: annoying phrasing

parent 2c22c418
......@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ not possible to block waiting on synchronization objects sanely. Two major
problems exist:
* Sleeping with no timeout set causes signals to be blocked, preventing the
user from using CTRL+C to terminate the process.
user from terminating the process using CTRL+C.
* Sleeping with a timeout set internally makes use of polling, with an
exponential backoff that eventually results in the thread sleeping
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment