For the reference on deco (performance, frequency not fixed):

	name                           time/object
	deco/fs1/zhash.py              15.8µs ± 2%
	deco/fs1/zhash.py-P16           116µs ±12%
	deco/fs1/zhash.go              2.60µs ± 0%
	deco/fs1/zhash.go+prefetch128  3.70µs ±11%
	deco/fs1/zhash.go-P16          13.4µs ±43%
	deco/zeo/zhash.py               316µs ± 7%
	deco/zeo/zhash.py-P16          2.68ms ± 7%
	deco/zeo/zhash.go               111µs ± 2%
	deco/zeo/zhash.go+prefetch128  57.7µs ± 2%
	deco/zeo/zhash.go-P16          1.23ms ± 5%

and in particular it shows that with the same ZEO/py server, the latency
to load an object via py client is ~ 3x worse compared to the latency to
load the same object via hereby Go client.

The performance was obtained via forthcoming neotest, and in particular
ZEO/go client will be also used in forthcoming zwrk (no analog on python side).

See http://navytux.spb.ru/~kirr/neo.html#performance-tests for details.

Tests: pending.