1. 15 Jul, 2024 4 commits
  2. 02 Jul, 2024 3 commits
  3. 17 Apr, 2024 1 commit
    • Kirill Smelkov's avatar
      promise/plugin/check_cpri_lock: Fix it to work ok with Amarisoft 2022 · 90cacfe6
      Kirill Smelkov authored
      Old Amarisoft versions emit data that is different compared to what 640c0130 expected:
      
      - there can be trailing spaces after /dev/sdrX@Y
        fix: adjust /dev/sdr regex
      - there is empty line coming in the end that fas failing in l.split(':', 1)
        fix: ignore empty lines and make detection of : in the line more
             robust with reporting which line is not valid instead of just
             "ERROR not enough values to unpack (expected 2, got 1)"
      - there is CPRI key instead of CPRI_option, and the data in both are different.
        fix: detect automatically whether it is CPRI_option or CPRI option that is present.
      
      /co-authored-by lu.xu <lu.xu@nexedi.com>
      /reviewed-on !132
      90cacfe6
  4. 15 Feb, 2024 4 commits
  5. 14 Feb, 2024 1 commit
  6. 18 Jan, 2024 1 commit
  7. 29 Nov, 2023 2 commits
  8. 02 Nov, 2023 4 commits
    • Kirill Smelkov's avatar
      slapos/promise/plugin/check_cpri_lock: Don't check whatever device blindly · 640c0130
      Kirill Smelkov authored
      Currently this promise is implemented by grepping whole rf_info output
      for "HW" and "SW" strings. But this won't work ok in the presence of
      multiple CPRI devices. Imagine, for example if one device has CPRI lock,
      while the other does not:
      
          PCIe CPRI /dev/sdr2@1:
            Hardware ID: 0x4b12
            DNA: [0x0048248a334a7054]
            Serial: ''
            FPGA revision: 2023-06-23  10:05:24
            FPGA vccint: 0.98 V
            FPGA vccaux: 1.76 V
            FPGA vccbram: 0.98 V
            FPGA temperature: 71.9 °C
            Clock tune: 0.0 ppm
            NUMA: 0
            CPRI_option: '5' (x8) lock=no                     <-- NOTE
            DMA0: TX fifo: 66.67us  Usage=16/32768 (0%)
            DMA0: RX fifo: 66.67us  Usage=16/32768 (0%)
            DMA0 Underflows: 0
            DMA0 Overflows: 0
          PCIe CPRI /dev/sdr3@1:
            Hardware ID: 0x4b12
            DNA: [0x0048248a334a7054]
            Serial: ''
            FPGA revision: 2023-06-23  10:05:24
            FPGA vccint: 0.98 V
            FPGA vccaux: 1.77 V
            FPGA vccbram: 0.98 V
            FPGA temperature: 71.7 °C
            Clock tune: 0.0 ppm
            NUMA: 0
            CPRI_option: '5' (x8) lock=HW+SW rx/tx=46.606us   <-- NOTE
              Port #0: T14=46.606us
            DMA0: TX fifo: 66.67us  Usage=16/32768 (0%)
            DMA0: RX fifo: 66.67us  Usage=16/32768 (0%)
            DMA0 Underflows: 0
            DMA0 Overflows: 0
      
      the old code would still report "CPRI locked all ok" and also globally
      without indicating which CPRI channel is locked.
      
      -> Fix it by adjusting check_cpri_lock to parse rf_info text more
      precisely, detect devices there and to understand which device has CPRI
      lock and which does not.
      
      For now this change is accompanied by the following change in
      ors-amarisoft SR to keep it working:
      
          --- a/software/ors-amarisoft/instance-enb.jinja2.cfg
          +++ b/software/ors-amarisoft/instance-enb.jinja2.cfg
          @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ parts =
             check-lopcomm-sync.py
             check-lopcomm-config-log.py
             check-lopcomm-stats-log.py
          -  check-cpri-lock.py
           {% endif %}
           {% if slapparameter_dict.get("dnsmasq", None) %}
             dnsmasq-service
          @@ -48,6 +47,7 @@ parts =
           {% endif %}
             monitor-base
             publish-connection-information
          +{% set extra_part_list = [] %}
      
           extends = {{ monitor_template }}
      
          @@ -688,12 +688,21 @@ config-testing = {{ slapparameter_dict.get("testing", False) }}
           config-config-log = ${lopcomm-rrh-config-template:log-output}
           config-stats-period = {{ slapparameter_dict.get("enb_stats_fetch_period", 60) }}
      
          -[check-cpri-lock.py]
          +{%  if ru == "lopcomm" %}
          +{%-   set cell_list = slapparameter_dict.get('cell_list', {'default': {}}) %}
          +{%-   for i, k in enumerate(cell_list) %}
          +{%-     set sfp_port = cell_list[k].get('cpri_port_number', i) %}
          +{%-     do extra_part_list.append('SFP{{sfp_port}}-cpri-lock.py') %}
          +[SFP{{sfp_port}}-cpri-lock.py]
           <= macro.promise
           promise = check_cpri_lock
           config-testing = {{ slapparameter_dict.get("testing", False) }}
          +config-sdr_dev  = {{ slapparameter_dict.get('sdr_number', 0) }}
          +config-sfp_port = {{ sfp_port }}
           config-amarisoft-rf-info-log = ${amarisoft-rf-info-template:log-output}
           config-stats-period = {{ slapparameter_dict.get("enb_stats_fetch_period", 60) }}
          +{%-  endfor %}
          +{% endif %}
      
           [check-rx-saturated.py]
           <= macro.promise
          @@ -702,3 +711,9 @@ config-testing = {{ slapparameter_dict.get("testing", False) }}
           config-amarisoft-stats-log = ${amarisoft-stats-template:log-output}
           config-stats-period = {{ slapparameter_dict.get("enb_stats_fetch_period", 60) }}
           config-max-rx-sample-db = {{ slapparameter_dict.get("max_rx_sample_db", 0) }}
          +
          +[buildout]
          +parts +=
          +{%- for part in extra_part_list %}
          +    {{ part }}
          +{%- endfor %}
      
      (posted in slapos!1461)
      
      The way rf_info text is parsed could be also useful in the future to
      e.g. detect FPGA revision of the boards and report their recency status
      via promise.
      
      /cc @jhuge, @tomo, @xavier_thompson, @Daetalus
      /reviewed-by @lu.xu
      /reviewed-on !127
      640c0130
    • Kirill Smelkov's avatar
      promise/plugin/check_cpri_lock: Fix it to detect stale data · 7c3b240f
      Kirill Smelkov authored
      This promise plugin was using tail_file(self.amarisoft_rf_info_log) to
      get the most recent log entry to check. But tail_file simply return last
      line of the log file without checking timestamp of returned entry. So it
      could be the case that last line is ages ago, reports "CPRI locked ok"
      and then, if there are no more rf_info entries for one reason or
      another, the CPRI-locked promise will be holding green despite the fact
      that data became stale.
      
      -> Fix it by explicitly checking timestamp of last log entry to be in
      expected recent range.
      
      /cc @jhuge, @tomo, @xavier_thompson, @Daetalus
      /reviewed-by @lu.xu
      /reviewed-on nexedi/slapos.toolbox!127
      7c3b240f
    • Kirill Smelkov's avatar
      promise/plugin/check_cpri_lock: test: Factor common code to write to log and... · 47f4f8a6
      Kirill Smelkov authored
      promise/plugin/check_cpri_lock: test: Factor common code to write to log and promise into common place
      
      We are going to add more tests. Keeping the code to initialize test
      environment duplicated over and over will be not convenient.
      
      /cc @jhuge, @tomo, @xavier_thompson, @Daetalus
      /reviewed-by @lu.xu
      /reviewed-on !127
      47f4f8a6
    • Kirill Smelkov's avatar
      promise/plugin/check_cpri_lock: test: No need to manually remove amarisoft_rf_info.json.log · 6db7895c
      Kirill Smelkov authored
      When files are opened with 'w' mode - they are truncated to empty state.
      
      /cc @jhuge, @tomo, @xavier_thompson, @Daetalus
      /reviewed-by @lu.xu
      /reviewed-on !127
      6db7895c
  9. 31 Oct, 2023 2 commits
    • Kirill Smelkov's avatar
      promise/plugin/check_rx_saturated: Don't hardcode "all rx antennas" as a set of what to check · a6211143
      Kirill Smelkov authored
      Currently check_rx_saturated checks saturation on all rx antennas. This
      works well for ORS, which has only one SDR board, but won't work for
      multiRU case where we will need to check RX for saturation for each
      Radio Unit separately.
      
      -> As a preparatory step adjust check_rx_saturated to take list of which
      RX antennas to check for saturation.
      
      For now this change is accompanied by the following change in
      ors-amarisoft SR to keep it working as before:
      
          --- a/software/ors-amarisoft/instance-enb.jinja2.cfg
          +++ b/software/ors-amarisoft/instance-enb.jinja2.cfg
          @@ -699,6 +699,7 @@ config-stats-period = {{ slapparameter_dict.get("enb_stats_fetch_period", 60) }}
           <= macro.promise
           promise = check_rx_saturated
           config-testing = {{ slapparameter_dict.get("testing", False) }}
          +config-rf-rx-chan-list = {{ list(range(0, int(slapparameter_dict.get('n_antenna_ul', default_n_antenna_ul)))) }}
           config-amarisoft-stats-log = ${amarisoft-stats-template:log-output}
           config-stats-period = {{ slapparameter_dict.get("enb_stats_fetch_period", 60) }}
           config-max-rx-sample-db = {{ slapparameter_dict.get("max_rx_sample_db", 0) }}
      
      (posted in slapos!1459)
      
      /cc @lu.xu, @xavier_thompson, @Daetalus
      /reviewed-by @jhuge
      /partly-reviewed-by @tomo
      /reviewed-on !126
      a6211143
    • Kirill Smelkov's avatar
      promise/plugin/check_sdr_busy: Don't hardcode /dev/sdr0@0 · 60d1bc2c
      Kirill Smelkov authored
      Currently check_sdr_busy always checks /dev/sdr0 (via `-c 0`) and
      also implicitly DMA channel 0 as sdr_util help explains:
      
          ./sdr_util  -h
          ...
          -c device_num              select the device (default = all)
          -d channel_num             select the channel (default = 0)
      
      This works well for ORS, which always has only single SDR board.
      
      However for cases when there are either a) multiple SDR boards, or b)
      single CPRI board, the assumption is incorrect:
      
      - for multiple SDR boards we need to be able to specify /dev/sdrX
        instead of sdr0.
      
      - for the case of one CPRI boards, links to different Radio Units
        attached to different SFP ports are associated with different DMA
        channels, so to test e.g. whether RU1 is being used it is necessary to
        check e.g. sdr0@0, while for RU2 it is necessary to check sdr0@1.
      
        I explicitly verified that for CPRI case
      
        a) Amarisoft kernel driver allows /dev/sdrX associated with CPRI card
           to be opened multiple times simultaneously - up to the amount of SFP
           ports = # of DMA channels, and
      
        b) that only DMA channels / SFP ports actually being in use are
           reported as busy by sdr_util, while the other DMA channels / SFP
           ports are not reported as busy.
      
        I also verified that for regular SDR board (not CPRI) using -d 0 does
        not change any verification semantic as such SDR boards have only one
        DMA channel.
      
      -> As a preparatory step for multiRU work adjust check_sdr_busy promise
      to take SDR device number and DMA channel number as arguments instead of
      hardcoding sdr0@0.
      
      For now this change is accompanied by the following change in
      ors-amarisoft SR to keep it working as before:
      
          --- a/software/ors-amarisoft/instance-enb.jinja2.cfg
          +++ b/software/ors-amarisoft/instance-enb.jinja2.cfg
          @@ -615,6 +615,8 @@ name = ${:_buildout_section_name_}
           promise = check_sdr_busy
           config-testing = {{ slapparameter_dict.get("testing", False) }}
           config-sdr = {{ sdr }}
          +config-sdr_dev  = 0
          +config-dma_chan = 0
      
      (posted in slapos!1458)
      
      /cc @xavier_thompson, @Daetalus
      /reviewed-by @jhuge, @lu.xu
      /partly-reviewed-by @tomo
      /reviewed-on !125
      60d1bc2c
  10. 27 Oct, 2023 4 commits
    • Kirill Smelkov's avatar
      promis/plugin/check_free_disk_space: np.float -> float · 5c1d2f76
      Kirill Smelkov authored
      Running tests with recent numpy (1.26.0) yields the following:
      
          slapos.toolbox$ python -m unittest discover -v   -s slapos/test/promise/plugin/ -t . -k test_display_prediction
          ...
          Enable to display disk space predictions: True
          module 'numpy' has no attribute 'float'.
          `np.float` was a deprecated alias for the builtin `float`. To avoid this error in existing code, use `float` by itself. Doing this will not modify any behavior and is safe. If you specifically wanted the numpy scalar type, use `np.float64` here.
          The aliases was originally deprecated in NumPy 1.20; for more details and guidance see the original release note at:
              https://numpy.org/devdocs/release/1.20.0-notes.html#deprecations
          Traceback (most recent call last):
            File "/home/kirr/src/wendelin/slapos/slapos.core/slapos/grid/promise/generic.py", line 500, in run
              self.sense()
            File "/home/kirr/src/wendelin/slapos/slapos.toolbox/slapos/promise/plugin/check_free_disk_space.py", line 327, in sense
              disk_space_prediction_tuple = self.diskSpacePrediction(
                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
            File "/home/kirr/src/wendelin/slapos/slapos.toolbox/slapos/promise/plugin/check_free_disk_space.py", line 182, in diskSpacePrediction
              df = df.astype({'free': np.float})
                                      ^^^^^^^^
            File "/home/kirr/src/wendelin/venv/py3.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/numpy/__init__.py", line 324, in __getattr__
              raise AttributeError(__former_attrs__[attr])
          AttributeError: module 'numpy' has no attribute 'float'.
          `np.float` was a deprecated alias for the builtin `float`. To avoid this error in existing code, use `float` by itself. Doing this will not modify any behavior and is safe. If you specifically wanted the numpy scalar type, use `np.float64` here.
          The aliases was originally deprecated in NumPy 1.20; for more details and guidance see the original release note at:
              https://numpy.org/devdocs/release/1.20.0-notes.html#deprecations
          ERROR
      
      -> Replace np.float with float as the error says.
      
      /cc @Just1, @lu.xu, @jhuge, @tomo
      /reviewed-on !123
      5c1d2f76
    • Kirill Smelkov's avatar
      promis/plugin/check_free_disk_space: test: Fix unclosed file ResourceWarning · daf7820f
      Kirill Smelkov authored
      folder_disk_test.sql was opened to be read but was not closed:
      
          slapos.toolbox$ python -m unittest discover -v   -s slapos/test/promise/plugin/ -t . -k test_display_prediction
          test_display_prediction (slapos.test.promise.plugin.test_check_free_disk_space.testcheckfreediskspace.test_display_prediction) ...
          /usr/lib/python3.11/unittest/case.py:576: resourcewarning: unclosed file <_io.textiowrapper name='/home/kirr/src/wendelin/slapos/slapos.toolbox/slapos/test/promise/data/disktest.sql' mode='r' encoding='utf-8'>
            self.setup()
      
      /cc @Just1, @lu.xu, @jhuge, @tomo
      /reviewed-on !124
      daf7820f
    • Kirill Smelkov's avatar
      *: Compare integers by == or != instead of by `is` or `is not` · dfb32247
      Kirill Smelkov authored
      Same logic as in previous patch. Suggested by @jeorme in
      !122 (comment 193062) .
      
      /suggested-and-reviewed-by @jerome
      /reviewed-n !122
      dfb32247
    • Kirill Smelkov's avatar
      *: Compare strings by == or != instead of by `is` or `is not` · b1c4c044
      Kirill Smelkov authored
      In python `is` checks object identity, not content:
      
          In [1]: a = 'hello'
      
          In [2]: a += ' world'
      
          In [3]: b = 'hello world'
      
          In [4]: id(a)
          Out[4]: 139735676540976
      
          In [5]: id(b)
          Out[5]: 139735675829040
      
          In [6]: a is b              <-- NOTE
          Out[6]: False
      
          In [7]: a == b              <-- NOTE
          Out[7]: True
      
      So comparing strings by is is generally incorrect.
      
      -> Fix strings comparision to use == / != everywhere (at least in found
      places where string is compared wrt string literal)
      
      We already had similar fix in a8526f4e, but seems the story continues
      again.
      
      /cc @alain.takoudjou, @Just1, @lu.xu, @jhuge, @tomo
      /reviewed-by @jerome
      /reviewed-on !122
      b1c4c044
  11. 12 Oct, 2023 2 commits
  12. 11 Oct, 2023 4 commits
  13. 22 Sep, 2023 2 commits
  14. 21 Sep, 2023 4 commits
  15. 07 Aug, 2023 1 commit
  16. 15 Jun, 2023 1 commit