Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
R
re6stnet
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Rafael Monnerat
re6stnet
Commits
622530d9
Commit
622530d9
authored
Jul 19, 2012
by
Guillaume Bury
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
minor TODO update
parent
f1be3456
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
18 additions
and
15 deletions
+18
-15
TODO
TODO
+18
-15
No files found.
TODO
View file @
622530d9
...
...
@@ -2,30 +2,33 @@ Bugs :
When no peer is avalaible, the setup crash without the --no-boot option
G : see below
U : this is still a bug to be solved
G : since the server is now a node it shouldn't ( the server will always
have a peer availabel which is himself )
To be done :
Use an algorithm to choose which connections to keep and/or establish
instead of pure randomness
Find a name for the project : the projet is ( or should be ) independant
from vifib, openvpn, babel, and so should the name; btw we aim to build a
distributed, scalable, resilient VPN.... ( if it helps with the name )
Replace comments at the beginning of functions with docstrings & give all
fn docstrings
Use the server events ( client connection/deconnection ) to do something
useful
In peers DB, remove some peers when they are too many of them -> remove the
dead peers
Use a timeout for the peersDB
Use a timeout for the peersDB
G : removing the dead peers should be enough
U : I was speaking of the server peers DB
G : the timeout is the duration of the certificate delivered ( 1y for now )
Specify a lease duration in ForwardViaUPnP
Handle LAN internally in order not to have catastrophic results ....
To be discussed:
...
...
@@ -48,13 +51,13 @@ To be discussed:
interfaces as wireless. However, treating an interface as wireless
doesn't lessen the hello_interval, it only changes how babel estimates
quality link, and cost.
U : from babel web page : "When the Babel daemon detects a wired network,
U : from babel web page : "When the Babel daemon detects a wired network,
it will use a larger interval between hellos".
Moreover, it seems that the wireless option only means
"hostile environment" which seems best for a resilient network.
Moreover, it seems that the wireless option only means
"hostile environment" which seems best for a resilient network.
30 sec of hello interval seams also too much. The default value for
babel is 4 sec (from babel man page).
According to raphael's stats on the nexedi's server downtime,
According to raphael's stats on the nexedi's server downtime,
45% of the problems dont last more than 2 minutes, 55% no more than
3 minutes If it takes 2 min to detect a dead connection, then we wont be
solving many problems with our overlay network
...
...
@@ -65,7 +68,7 @@ To be discussed:
like 0.01 or less ) to the total number of peers in the entire network,
with maybe a max size.
U : what we need to do is to keep the randomness. For this, we need a big
enought DB to ensure we can still choose a peer as if it was choosen
enought DB to ensure we can still choose a peer as if it was choosen
directly from the server. The requiered db size can be calculated from
the number of connections and the refresh time.
...
...
@@ -75,8 +78,8 @@ To be discussed:
U : Ok, but the server knows when no peers is avalaible, doesn't he ?
G : Well when no peer is available the SQL request ( + next() method ) raise
a StopIteration exception
U : Well, I don't think this is a good thing. When not in debug, a node
cannot now if the
ir
is anyone else already connected
U : Well, I don't think this is a good thing. When not in debug, a node
cannot now if the
re
is anyone else already connected
G : don't reconnect to server each time we repopulate in peers_db ?
U : From what I've read on the internet, when you create a server object,
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment