- 30 Oct, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This will improve the summary of problems at the end of slapos node instance. /reviewed-on nexedi/slapos.core!144
-
Boxiang Sun authored
[Test result](https://nexedijs.erp5.net/#/test_result_module?extended_search=%20%22Boxiang-SLAPOS-CORE-FIXUP%22&page=form&view=view) /reviewed-on nexedi/slapos.core!149
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Used to remove shared parts that are no longer referenced. With shared part installed for example in `/opt/slapgrd/shared/name/HASH` the heuristic is to assume that if `HASH` is present in a software's `.installed.cfg`, then this software is using this shared part. Similar, if `HASH` is present in `/opt/slapgrid/shared/another/ANOTHER_HASH/.slapos*signature` then share part another for hash `ANOTHER_HASH` is using the shared part. This also have some support to recursively look in instances and if they contain a `slapos.cfg` file, look for software and shared parts to see if they use the shared part. In other cases, this shared part can be deleted. /reviewed-on nexedi/slapos.core!139
-
- 29 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Thomas Gambier authored
python3-wheels and python3-setuptools are installed when we installed python3-pip only if recommended packages are installed. It's better to force the installation of what we need.
-
- 28 Oct, 2019 6 commits
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
This normalizes the result on python2 and python3, and as well, makes the result more accurate.
-
Julien Muchembled authored
-
Julien Muchembled authored
When reinstalling a computer, 'node software' may run before 'node format' has created users, then it fails because it can't set ownership of the directory it created. The directory already exists on next runs and before this commit, it didn't fix the ownership.
-
Julien Muchembled authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
/reviewed-on nexedi/slapos.core!132
-
Jérome Perrin authored
The most important are: * sometimes instance was not properly destroyed, apparently we need to retry `slapos node report` * if instance is not properly destroy, remove the files ourself and mark test failed * we need to see log files and config files from the instance there's also a few small commits not directly related. /reviewed-on nexedi/slapos.core!145
-
- 26 Oct, 2019 12 commits
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
-
Julien Muchembled authored
/reviewed-on nexedi/slapos.core!143
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
Introduce a new command for run promises only, from all partitions. This helps to perform quick checks.
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
On the tests for ConsumptionReportBase, it contains a port from a test on slapos.toolbox done by Alain Takoudjou.
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
This may case more memory usage and more 'live' data to handle, for this reason, I'm making it configurable
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
This new report class is responsable for generate a file (serealising it per pertition), instead rely on concurrent calls to the sqlite.
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
This is just to clean the methods a bit
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
Extend monitor to grab this information, this allow us use slapos node collect more efficiently, and prevent others softwares to access directly the database.
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
-
- 25 Oct, 2019 7 commits
-
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
- We should only try to remove leaked partitions if we detected some, otherwise it may produce a strange message "unable to delete leaked partitions". - If some supervisor configuration is still present after partition deletion, they must be removed not to block next test and the current test must be marked failed.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
destroying instance is supposed to remove these, but when there are issues removing instances we sometimes have supervisor config left from previous instances. Reformating now delete theses after logging the problem.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Quite often when test fail we don't have any information about what was wrong with the tested instance. Dumping the generated etc/* files and the instance log files should help diagnosing such errors.
-
- 23 Oct, 2019 5 commits
-
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
/reviewed-on !147
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This command sometimes fail, for example with: 2019-10-23 06:10:56 slapos[27556] ERROR Traceback (most recent call last): File "slapos/grid/SlapObject.py", line 800, in destroy self.cleanupFolder(self.instance_path) File "slapos/grid/SlapObject.py", line 836, in cleanupFolder os.remove(os.path.join(folder_path, file)) FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'tmp/inst/defp5/.installed.cfg.tmp'
-
Jérome Perrin authored
otherwise logged error and critical messages are just ignored.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
maybe this is something slapos node instance should do instead ...
-
- 10 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
When having more than one read_only_shared_part_list, the template was first rendered with indentation and then dedented, but since dedent only remove the common indentation, we ended up with slapos.cfg like this: ``` $ cat /data/slappart11_testnode/cqg/inst/test0-9/tmp/etc/slapos.cfg [slapos] software_root = /data/slappart11_testnode/cqg/inst/test0-9/tmp/soft instance_root = /data/slappart11_testnode/cqg/inst/test0-9/tmp/inst shared_part_list = /srv/slapgrid/slappart11/srv/shared /srv/slapgrid/slappart11/srv/testnode/cqg/shared /data/slappart11_testnode/cqg/inst/test0-9/tmp/shared master_url = http://10.0.12.198:46312 computer_id = local root_check = False ``` First dedent, then render the template to prevent this issue. Apply this to other uses of textwrap.dedent for consistency. /reviewed-on nexedi/slapos.core!140
-
- 09 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Boxiang Sun authored
When the testnode installing `slapos_subscription_request`, it reports: ``` 2019-10-08 19:09:59,997 INFO runTestSuite: Adding erp5_web_renderjs_ui business template ... (imported in 2.513s) done (21.342s) 2019-10-08 19:09:59,997 INFO runTestSuite: Adding slapos_subscription_request business template ... (imported in 2.692s) Traceback (most recent call last): ..... 2019-10-08 19:10:00,008 INFO runTestSuite: ValueError: "commerce_validation_workflow" is not a workflow ID ``` I found the `commerce_validation_workflow` is inside `erp5_commerce` bt. So I add `erp5_commerce` as the dependency of `slapos_subscription_request`. /reviewed-on nexedi/slapos.core!141
-
- 08 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Thomas Gambier authored
-
- 07 Oct, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This new option for slapos.cfg allow to define a list of paths to use for shared parts feature of `slapos.recipe.cmmi`. This will be injected in the buildout profile used to install software, as `${buildout:shared-part-list}` which is the option `slapos.recipe.cmmi` use since 0.11. Note that the option changed in `slapos.recipe.cmmi` because this was incompatible. In 0.10, the option was named `${buildout:shared-parts}` and it was supposed to be a single path. `slapos.recipe.cmmi` 0.10 was trying to create this path. If we continued using this `${buildout:shared-parts}` option and changed to passe a newline-separated list of paths, then `slapos.recipe.cmmi` would just create one directory with \n in the name and will probably fail, which would make all software from 1.0.73 to 1.0.121 not installable on next `slapos.core`, so we used another buildout option to prevent this problem. Because generally, profiles using slapos.recipe.cmmi 0.10 were not "safely" shared, we don't even provide compatibility with old option. /reviewed-on nexedi/slapos.core!46
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This is about replacing the `utils.py` we have duplicated in each software release tests by a more "official API". This introduce a "sandalone slapos API" which are helpers around slapos API to create a recursive SlapOS. This can eventually replace implementation of erp5testnode and slaprunner (but there are no plans for that) /reviewed-on nexedi/slapos.core!64
-