form_list does not use Base_edit

XXX TODO Formulator checkbox must be modified to not render an input when the field is in read only
Otherwise, in listbox, it creates an input inside a `a` element, which is not valid html

This reverts commit 689e242c.

Prevent generating wrong urls for now

romain_dev: forum

romain_dev: forum use html viewer

romain_dev: forum improve post rendering

romain_dev: thread reader use page language inqtead of local

romain_dev: forum set expected link on the listbox cells

romain_dev: thread fixup

romain_dev: thread use line separator instead of background color

romain_dev: thread paginate

romain_dev: forum link to last page

romain_dev: thread simplify conf from erp5form

romain_dev: forum attachment

romain_dev: thread force white background

This reverts commit e50d05af.

Do not access form submission REQUEST from the listbox list method,
as it is rendered asynchronously in ERP5JS

Allow edition in the new UI

This make everything slow as hell and prevent to quickly save.

Example: <h2 class="foo">bar</h2> => <h3 class="foo">bar</h3>

erp5_web_renderjs_ui: keep previous focus color

Set the max-age value to 4h instead of 10min for the one-day-max policy
(ie, 24h/6, like one-hour-max uses 10min max age).

The idea is to reduce backend access of nearly static web sites,
while still allowing changes without waiting for too long before it is propagated.

If user group are recalculated before changing the workflow state, it will only return the same security group
See nexedi/erp5@c00c3636

 Don't add to total_contribution_relief if employer price is not set (None).

It was not running because we had two methods with same name

This reverts commit 5e21f77f.

This was done too quickly based on a wrong assumption that simulation
movements to build would always be in planned state and that we could
have an efficient way of selecting them by catalog with index on
portal_type and simulation state, but it does not work this way.

Maybe the change is useful for something else, but since we don't have
any use case for now, let's just revert.

See merge request nexedi/erp5!2001

See merge request nexedi/erp5!2003