- 21 Jan, 2022 5 commits
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Change max age to 1 hour and 1 day
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Without these accessors, we have to use constructs like: resource.edit( default_purchase_supply_line_destination_account='account_module/123' ) with the accessors, we can use: resource.edit( default_purchase_supply_line_destination_account_value=account, ) The former is a bit error prone, because typos in the property name silently create a local propery and typos in the relative URL make a "broken" relation.
-
- 20 Jan, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
- 18 Jan, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
odt_style comes with "Print" global actions which allows getting the default form as ODT and convert it to selected format and DMS comes with "Print" actions which return a PDF of the document content. As a result, when user try to use Print, they have the same action twice with no way to know which one is which. This is detected by CodingStyleTestCase.test_DuplicateActions, but only for configurations where both erp5_odt_style and erp5_dms are installed, which is not the case in coding style test suite which only install the miminmal dependent business templates.
-
- 17 Jan, 2022 3 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Fixes after nexedi/erp5!1451 With the RAM implementation it was possible to use in session: - list or dict of temp documents - temp documents created with `newTempBase` ( not just `newContent(temp_object=True, ...)` ) This repairs these two use cases. See merge request nexedi/erp5!1533
-
Jérome Perrin authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1532
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This is a step to be able to run ERP5 on zope4, where servers are no longer started by ZConfig. This will be used by nexedi/slapos!1114 See merge request nexedi/erp5!1529
-
- 14 Jan, 2022 6 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
The new workflow implementation from df85ef46 (ERP5Workflow: DC Workflows are now ERP5 objects (!1378)., 2020-11-18) had a different behavior in the implementation of _executeTransition, it was setting all kwargs from the transition in REQUEST. The reasons for this are unclear, it seem to come from the first Workflow implementation, 81784db4 (Initial Import of ERP5Workflow porduct., 2010-10-15) The side effects are that calling a workflow method, for example: document.edit(key=value) would also alter the global request to set key=value in REQUEST, for the rest of the current request. It was causing subtle issues, especially in tests where the REQUEST lifetime is long.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This was redirecting with the full list of updated documents URLs, causing too long URLs. This also simplifies code a bit, change the wording of messages and use translation.
-
Yusei Tahara authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Now that TemporaryDocumentMixin and TempBase implementation details have been made consistent, there's no reason to duplicate code. This also make TempBase uses TemporaryDocumentMixin of __setstate__, so TempBase have more sane behaviour when being pickled.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Products.ERP5Type.mixin.temporary.TemporaryDocumentMixin and Products.ERP5Type.Base.TempBase implementations were a bit different: - getTitle was acquiring title in TemporaryDocumentMixin, although this was probably never acquiring in practice because most documents have a title. - isIndexable was an int and not a PropertyConstantGetter like it is supposed to be. Change TemporaryDocumentMixin to behave like TempBase here. =
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Before f359f267 (Use Distributed Cache for Session, 2021-07-19) when we were using RAM cache for sessions, it was possible to store collections (eg. dicts or lists) with reference to ERP5 documents in session, but after this change, using such collections was refused with error: TypeError: Can't pickle objects in acquisition wrappers. This change restore the possibility of using collections, by being more clever when we store and retrieve collections
-
- 13 Jan, 2022 9 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
no need to create temp objects because anyway the transaction is aborted at the end of each test. This solve a problem that some APIs behave differently on temp objects and we don't really have use cases where we use actions on temp objects. For reference, the case which fail is an action with a TALES condition using a related accessor, the exact condition was: python: object.getAggregateRelated(portal_type="Implicit Item Movement") is not None
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This was not patching the right place (I should have used mock ...)
-
Jérome Perrin authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1531
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
The portal types using this form are all PresencePeriod or subclasses, so use PresencePeriod as a prefix.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
TaskMovement_getSimulationStateColorText was same content and calendar depends on project
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Rename Orgnaisation_generatePlanningDomain to Organisation_generatePlanningDomain
-
Jérome Perrin authored
also rewrite a sorted to use key instead of cmp
-
Jérome Perrin authored
by calling proxy_field.checkConsistency(fixit=True) on them
-
- 12 Jan, 2022 2 commits
-
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
This tic call has a lot of activities to process. Checking test result history over the last 2 months, the whole test runtime is mostly under 800s, but with a handful of spikes around 1600s, with one at 2300s. So pick just slightly more than the worst over 2 months.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
- 11 Jan, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
- 07 Jan, 2022 9 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Also revert related fixup commits: "CMFActivity: fixup do not loop on tic if the node is the distribution node" "Products.ERP5Type.tests: Follow-up on ActivityTool.tic signature change." While the original commit did improve the specific workload it was designed to improve, it turned out to degrade too much intensive activity workloads, like initial ERP5 site creation and tests (which, for the purposes of this change, are the same as a single-zope instance). Given how easy it is to get a multi-Zope instance, which would solve the original issue and also provide the better performance necessary anyway for an instance managing a non-trivial amount of documents, I choose to revert this change. I am not reverting several loosely-related changes I applied, which rather fix real bugs uncovered by the different activity execution scheme this change provided, especially by letting tests' "stop_condition" callback being executed a lot more often between activities, uncovering missing dependencies and unrealistic test expectations, whose fixes should be beneficial independently from the reverted code. This reverts commit 4dfafbc9. This reverts commit 4eb26017. This reverts commit 041642d0.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Products.ERP5Security.test.testERP5Security: Fix TestMigration.test_DuplicateUserIdPreventionDuringMigration scope.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
For realism: the goal of this exception is to prevent duplicate, and it relies on the exception triggering a rollback in the transaction manager (like any transaction error). Also, use "any()" rather than building entire lists just to check for non- emptiness.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Person and ERP5 Login documents must be indexed before ERP5Site_disableERP5UserManager may run, so set the migration tag on these indexation activities.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Several tests are failing on test nodes with the chosen 100s timeout. Increase it to 10 minutes. Longer, more exceptional, calls may benefit from exposing this delay as a tic argument.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Consistently with the Selenium timeout increase.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Products.ERP5Type.tests.ProcessingNodeTestCase: Make tic independent from the number of activities processed per tic. That number was vastly decreased, causing tests to bail with "tic is looping forever" for no good reason. Convert such logic into a deadline one.
-
- 06 Jan, 2022 3 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
When running with ZServer, TimerServer will be started by ZConfig machinery, because ZServer comes with some ZConfig data types for server factory which start servers. One Zope 2, ZServer was imported from zopeschema: https://github.com/zopefoundation/Zope/blob/2.13.30/src/Zope2/Startup/zopeschema.xml#L10 and ZConfig used the TimerServerFactory to create a TimerService. On Zope 4, ZServer is not imported anymore in the new wsgischema: https://github.com/zopefoundation/Zope/blob/4.6.3/src/Zope2/Startup/wsgischema.xml so the ZConfig data type can not be used to create the server. Instead of relying on ZServer's ZConfig, we create the server directly from the startup script, the logic to attach to waitress is already here and startup and factory just called create, so the only difference is that we no longer use zope.conf to configure TimerService, but configure from the script. SlapOS profile also needs to be modified in order to not include ZConfig bits for timerserver and to pass the timerserver interval in the wrapper to this script.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Since https://github.com/zopefoundation/Zope/commit/2da2c2c28a8b21e78e8ef93aa17da926e3102c26 SERVER_PORT is assumed to be convertible to int. The value of this port is not really supposed to be used because TimerServer requests does not have a server (for example in CMFActivity we recreate the initial request), so put a value of -1 to prevent accidental use.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Only catch exceptions, we don't need a bare except here. In case of exception, log the traceback instead of being silent.
-