- 18 Jun, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Roque authored
-
- 17 Jun, 2019 3 commits
- 14 Jun, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Roque authored
- changes in form rendering, like hide modification date, don't affect storage replication (like forms 'AsJioView' do) - each officejs app will have its own view actions, allowing to share portal types
-
- 12 Jun, 2019 4 commits
- 11 Jun, 2019 3 commits
- 10 Jun, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Roque authored
-
- 07 Jun, 2019 2 commits
- 31 May, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Roque authored
-
- 29 May, 2019 2 commits
- 27 May, 2019 6 commits
-
-
Roque authored
-
Roque authored
- new approach uses a new ojs jio gadget - old one is kept for backward compatibility (not migrated apps)
-
Roque authored
-
Roque authored
-
Roque authored
-
Roque authored
- new approach uses a new controller gadget - old one is kept for backward compatibility (not migrated apps)
-
- 24 May, 2019 9 commits
- 23 May, 2019 2 commits
- 22 May, 2019 5 commits
-
-
Roque authored
-
Roque authored
-
Roque authored
-
Roque authored
-
Thomas Gambier authored
For example, if property_sheet "prop" was moved from BT 1 to BT 2 and BT 1 doesn't exist anymore. Before this commit we have this order: 1. install BT 2 ("prop" exist and isn't touched) 2. remove BT 1 ("prop" is removed) => at the end "prop" doesn't exist anymore After this commit we have this order: 1. remove BT 1 ("prop" is removed) 2. install BT 2 ("prop" is readded) => at the end "prop" exists and is OK /reviewed-on !866
-