- 11 Oct, 2016 9 commits
-
-
Filipa Lacerda authored
-
Filipa Lacerda authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Allows empty merge requests for a workflow described in gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#14606 Closes gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#14606 See merge request !6384
-
Robert Speicher authored
Add `robots.txt` to the list of reserved namespaces See #22759 See merge request !6789
-
Robert Speicher authored
Bump mail_room to v0.8.1 to fix thread cleanup issue See https://github.com/tpitale/mail_room/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md Closes #20273 See merge request !6788
-
Artem Sidorenko authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Remove NamespacesController * removes unnecessary NamespacesController. The main purpose of this controller was redirect to group or user page when URL like https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org was used. Now this functionality is handled by constrainers (like this https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/config/routes/user.rb#L17-21) and take user to correct controller right from the start. * serve non existing API routes like `/api/v3/whatever` with Grape instead of Rails. Before this change wrong API url was served by rails with not obvious 404, 405 & 500 errors See merge request !6733
-
Nick Thomas authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Formatted all app/assets/javascripts to underscore naming convention ## What does this MR do? Changes all javascript file names to user underscores as delimiter. This will be enforced in the docs in a different MR !6782. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? Consistency. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #23118 See merge request !6783
-
- 10 Oct, 2016 31 commits
-
-
Stan Hu authored
Closes #20273
-
Fatih Acet authored
Changed 'Compare branches, tags or commit ranges' to 'Compare Git revisions' ## What does this MR do? I remember we had a quick discussion about what to call the expected input of the compare page. Today whilst doing !6766 I found these are called [git revisions](https://git-scm.com/docs/gitrevisions). ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-10_at_14.44.13](/uploads/694200b8f56967d8e7caa965bbf7c123/Screen_Shot_2016-10-10_at_14.44.13.png) Dunno where that gradient came
😆 Screenshot issue not code. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? See merge request !6774 -
Fatih Acet authored
Changed network input placeholder to 'Git revision' ## What does this MR do? Changes the commit SHA-1 input placeholder on the network page to `Git revision`. ([as defined here](https://git-scm.com/docs/gitrevisions)) ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? Placeholder was too complex ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-10_at_15.06.23](/uploads/e31586b0f7a973b04e55e73223a2a95c/Screen_Shot_2016-10-10_at_15.06.23.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20356 See merge request !6766
-
Fatih Acet authored
Fix inconsistent options dropdown caret on mobile viewports ## What does this MR do? Change the options dropdown caret from left aligned to right aligned (only visible on mobile viewports) ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Check if there are any other dropdowns that have left aligned carets ## Why was this MR needed? Resolve UI inconsistency as some dropdown carets were already right aligned ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![Simulator_Screen_Shot_Sep_15__2016__11.54.55_AM](/uploads/767d9344db4973af5a5368d5149144cc/Simulator_Screen_Shot_Sep_15__2016__11.54.55_AM.png) After: ![Simulator_Screen_Shot_Sep_15__2016__11.54.09_AM](/uploads/882614cb9c5f85bf44e118cd7c74fcef/Simulator_Screen_Shot_Sep_15__2016__11.54.09_AM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #22086 See merge request !6372
-
Fatih Acet authored
Added copy file path button to diffs ## What does this MR do? Adds a copy file path button in the header of diff files. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-10_at_09.59.48](/uploads/1aedd5033bb3c1893023bb8c8d99a708/Screen_Shot_2016-10-10_at_09.59.48.png) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #23108 See merge request !6769
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Remove redundant mixins ## What does this MR do? Removes the following redundant mixins ``` @mixin box-shadow($shadow) { box-shadow: $shadow; } @mixin border-radius($radius) { border-radius: $radius; } ``` ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Just need to make sure the refactor didn't break anything. Last time I did something like this, we faced an edge case where values `.5` would pass correctly in mixins but not when passed directly to the property. ## Why was this MR needed? * Reduces redundant code which leads to happier developers
😄 ## Screenshots (if relevant) None ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #22012 See merge request !6287 -
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Add link to test coverage report to README ## What does this MR do? Since we have GitLab Pages with test coverage report, it makes sense to link coverage badge there, instead of linking to commits page. See merge request !6772
-
Robert Speicher authored
Rename HTMLEntityFilter to HtmlEntityFilter to fix autoloading See merge request !6776
-
Luke Bennett authored
-
Stan Hu authored
Use user from let instead recreate in before ## What does this MR do? It`s minor fix in tests. We can use factory from let instead recreate user before each test. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? No ## Why was this MR needed? ## Screenshots (if relevant) No ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? See merge request !6762
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Improve backup doc readability From https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/3761 See merge request !6781
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
[ci skip]
-
Robert Speicher authored
Explain the extra chmod There is confusion about what passing `0600` to File.open does. ``` $ touch /tmp/foobar $ ls -l /tmp/foobar -rw-r--r-- 1 jacobvosmaer wheel 0 Sep 26 14:20 /tmp/foobar $ ruby -e 'File.open("/tmp/foobar", "w", 0600)' $ ls -l /tmp/foobar -rw-r--r-- 1 jacobvosmaer wheel 0 Sep 26 14:20 /tmp/foobar $ $ $ rm /tmp/foobar $ ruby -e 'File.open("/tmp/foobar", "w", 0600)' $ ls -l /tmp/foobar -rw------- 1 jacobvosmaer wheel 0 Sep 26 14:21 /tmp/foobar ``` See merge request !6523
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Changes to make Git basics more intuitive From https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6420 See merge request !6777
-
Jerdog authored
-
Jerdog authored
- updated verbiage where appropriate - changed "git config" commands to include quotes for variables to be more in line with standard practive and to avoid issues with spaces - updated CHANGELOG as part of commit
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Remove Ci::ApplicationController. See gitlab-org/gitlab-ce!6757.
-
Takuya Noguchi authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Nick Thomas authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Clarify which token should be used to delete a Runner See merge request !6775
-
Gennady Trafimenkov authored
-
Luke Bennett authored
-
Luke Bennett authored
Changed 'Commit hash' to 'Git revision'
-
Kamil Trzciński authored
Fix ci pipeline processing with async jobs ## What does this MR do? This MR fixes CI pipeline processing with asynchronous jobs called from `around_transition` provided by state machine. For details see https://github.com/pluginaweek/state_machine/issues/191 and commit f68acbac. ## Why was this MR needed? Recently merged https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6650 introduced problem with asynchronous job being deployed when `around_transition` still held transaction, which caused race condition that prevented pipeline status to change in a proper way. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #23111 See merge request !6736
-
Sean McGivern authored
Correct namespace validation to forbid bad names #21077 ## What does this MR do? Updates master namespace regex to forbid any namespace ending in `.git` or `.atom` and corrects and adds relevant tests ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? I think it's all good. I could use help with the creation of tests for usernames with trailing `.atom` or `.git` as the testing framework is a bit over my head. ## Why was this MR needed? A group that ends in `.atom` will cause the relevent dashboard to crash if the user (ANY user, not just the creator) has visibility of the group until it is deleted through the admin panel (it cannot be renamed, the edit page will crash. It may be fixable through the API, that wasn't checked.) This allows a malicious user with group creation privileges to bulk add users to a group, rename the group to a bad name, and crash the groups dashboard for all members of the group. The same applies if the group is internal or public and users navigate to the explore tab of the groups dashboard. The same applies to usernames ending in `.atom`. In many places of the code, it implies that `.git` in not allowed at the end of namespaces, but many allowed it anyway. This MR forbids it everywhere to prevent potential issues (like the one with `.atom` going forward). ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Group path validation incomplete, crashes groups dashboard #21077 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [X] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [X] Added for this feature/bug - [X] All builds are passing - [X] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [X] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [X] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5994
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-