- 18 Oct, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Lin Jen-Shin authored
* upstream/master: (409 commits) Update endpoint to username validator change border color to variable Add todo for deprecated user routes and more information about deprecation to changelog Provide better error message to the user Apply better hierarchy to markdown headers and issue/mr titles Swapped button text manipulation outcomes for the toggle query Fixed find file keyboard navigation Update CHANGELOG for 8.12.7 Added download-button class and applied button margin Enable activerecord_sane_schema_dumper for test Updated logo from @luke Fix broken specs on MySQL after https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6896 Fix Test Env (proper error handling when gitlab-shell is not clonned) Fix randomly crashing spinach test for merge request [Great spinach fix] Replace gsub with delete Remove carriage returns from commit description as summary is on a newline and will always include carriage returns Convert due_date_select.js filetype to es6. Stop directly parsing due_date with Date.parse, prefer parsing implicitly. Improve spec for pipeline metrics worker Add Pipeline metrics worker ...
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Resolve Merge conflicts in editor ## What does this MR do? This is the second iteration of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20344 which now allows to resolve conflicts manually providing an editor to the user. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? - Previous implementation has been refactored almost from the ground up. - Also some components like `parallel-conflict-lines` has been optimized to work well with PhantomJS. - The app and files required files are loaded only when needed. `merge_conflicts_bundle.js` is only loaded in `/<group>/<project>/merge_requests/<Id>/conflicts` only ## Why was this MR needed? Some MRs were unable to be solved interactively in the UI, with this MR we let the user to manually fix complex merge request conflicts. ## Screenshots (if relevant) <img src="/uploads/33a016f025bd590b1fc6eeee1ee11626/Screen_Shot_2016-09-19_at_1.39.39_PM.png" width="800"> ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20344, https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/3567. See merge request !6374
-
- 17 Oct, 2016 38 commits
-
-
Stan Hu authored
Fixes endpoint to username validator Fixes failing specs on master. Introduced here https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6328 See merge request !6951
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Apply better hierarchy to markdown headers and issue/mr titles ## What does this MR do? Applies better hierarchy to markdown headers and issue/mr titles ## Why was this MR needed? Titles of issues/mr's were smaller than h1, leading to strange hierarchy when reading descriptions ## Screenshots (if relevant) ### Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-14_at_1.31.37_PM](/uploads/79b6b16b8ed1b3b49578161eea1f0e42/Screen_Shot_2016-10-14_at_1.31.37_PM.png) ### After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-14_at_1.31.26_PM](/uploads/f710b63c112e342c5429810984079da6/Screen_Shot_2016-10-14_at_1.31.26_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21395 See merge request !6904
-
tauriedavis authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Fix toggling of expand/hide pipeline graph button ## What does this MR do? Corrects the toggling behaviour given that the pipeline graph now starts in a different state. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? Expand/hide toggling UI is buggyyy ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![2016-10-14_18.15.41](/uploads/7cdeef02c0b8aa4266f2878866e4b633/2016-10-14_18.15.41.gif) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #23358 See merge request !6898
-
Robert Speicher authored
Rename users routing from /u/:username to /users/:username for consistency with other routes Renames /u/:username to /users/:username To follow consistency with other routes (like groups) and UsersController name. Now when you can use `/:username` for accessing user page there is no need in shortcut like `/u/` See merge request !6851
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
tauriedavis authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Fixed find file keyboard navigation ## What does this MR do? The code to view a file on find file page was removed, this adds that back in & adds some tests. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #23423 See merge request !6944
-
Fatih Acet authored
Resolve "No space between buttons on Files page" ## What does this MR do? Adds a `.download-button` class to the project download button and added `10px` of margin to this button within the `.tree-controls`. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? Whitespace is gr8! ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-16_at_14.05.09](/uploads/2da692bd55e06c730d048ccf9173bd2c/Screen_Shot_2016-10-16_at_14.05.09.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #23380 See merge request !6921
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Luke Bennett authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Enable activerecord_sane_schema_dumper for test ## What does this MR do? Enable `activerecord_sane_schema_dumper` for test allowing to use `test` database for consistent schema generation. See merge request !6931
-
Phil Hughes authored
Closes #23423
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Updated logo from @luke Closes #23274 See merge request !6942
-
Rémy Coutable authored
[ci skip] Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Luke Bennett authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Matt Lee authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
Fix broken specs on MySQL ## What does this MR do? Fixes broken master after https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6896 See merge request !6935
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Fix Test Env (proper error handling when gitlab-shell is not clonned) ## What does this MR do? If we were not able to clone gitlab-shell we have to stop all test suite, for now we run it regardless we cloned it or not. ## Why was this MR needed? To not confuse developers when build is red, to get fasts feedback, to save resources and time. See merge request !6933
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Fix Safari displaying NaN for selected due date ## What does this MR do? 1. Stops using `Date.parse` to parse selected due dates. 2. Refactors DueDateSelectors to be more maintainable and readable ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? **To review the actual fix, look here:** https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/4ad43ac3a12902d7ea01dc09f8a361b01c21a0ee. It would be difficult to pick out from the overall diff. ## Why was this MR needed? In Safari, the due date selector was displaying 'NaN' when a date is selected, which was being returned by `Date.parse`. Because `Date.parse` is implemented differently across browsers it's generally recommended to favor implicit Date parsing with the `Date` constructor. For more background on this, [see MDN on Date.parse](https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Date/parse). Also, the code for DueDateSelector was pretty messy, and its logic was very tightly coupled, so I refactored it. None of the basic logic changed, I just broke it up into smaller pieces and made it more OO. Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22984 See merge request !6797
-
-
Valery Sizov authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Fix randomly crashing spinach test for merge request For https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23378 See merge request !6932
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Fix atom feed spinach failure ## What does this MR do? Replaces all carriage returns in the expected commit description. Is a partial fix to... > spinach 5 10 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/builds/5132637 - partial fix in !6910 As you can see, the other half of the fix to this build is in !6910. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? Failed spinach tests ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? See merge request !6922
-
Kamil Trzciński authored
Add Pipeline metrics worker ## What does this MR do? Creating a new Merge Request metrics is time consuming, because we need to access repository. This makes this operation asynchronous, thus non-blocking for updating pipeline. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? See merge request !6896
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Valery Sizov authored
-
Luke Bennett authored
Remove carriage returns from commit description as summary is on a newline and will always include carriage returns
-
Robert Speicher authored
Add RTL support to Markdown rendering See merge request !6296
-
Bryce Johnson authored
-
Bryce Johnson authored
-
Sean McGivern authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Fix trending projects Spinach failure The trending projects list is now pre-calculated. To make this work with the Spinach test, we have to manually refresh the list. Partial fix to #23378 See merge request !6911
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-