- 17 Dec, 2016 14 commits
-
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
-
Sean McGivern authored
Enable Style/MultilineOperationIndentation in Rubocop Fixes #25741 See merge request !8125
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
Mattermost session This branch is based of tag v8.14.4 so I could test on an instance better. But stuck on the tests, as setting up the whole doorkeeper stuff doesn't seem to be supported for testing. See merge request !8033
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-
Sean McGivern authored
Cleaner merge commit messages Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23462 See merge request !7722
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
Add sorting functionality for group/project members ## What does this MR do? This MR adds sort functionality to group/project members list. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? No. ## Why was this MR needed? This MR helps the user to manage and find users of a group/project fast. It also improves UX. ## Screenshots (if relevant) **Before** ![before-pr-member](/uploads/412bfdfddc63e48a62e2095d664660b5/before-pr-member.png) **After** ![pr-after](/uploads/ae23a5c7689b46d26a948f22a0ac2360/pr-after.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) entry added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21622 Closes #23573 See merge request !7032
-
- 16 Dec, 2016 26 commits
-
-
Stan Hu authored
Avoid use of Hash#dig to keep compatibility with Ruby 2.1 See merge request !8153
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
Refactor Bitbucket importer to use BitBucket API Version 2 ## What does this MR do? ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? ## What are the relevant issue numbers? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19946 ## Screenshots (if relevant) This MR needs the following permissions in the Bitbucket OAuth settings: ![image](/uploads/a26ae5e430a724bf581a92da7028ce3c/image.png) - [] ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5995
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Nur Rony authored
-
Nur Rony authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Nur Rony authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Resolve "Clean up CSS for project alerts and flash notifications." ## What does this MR do? Cleans up CSS and html for alert stripes at the top of project pages. ## Screenshots #### Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-12-16_at_2.39.01_PM_copy](/uploads/6a700cf1e41557c00cdaef40f6a2a5b2/Screen_Shot_2016-12-16_at_2.39.01_PM_copy.png) #### After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-12-16_at_2.39.23_PM_copy](/uploads/c849578becc3a634e8b15ab5340d86a2/Screen_Shot_2016-12-16_at_2.39.23_PM_copy.png) ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? In order to get multiple alerts to appear manually while testing, I simply added the following block to [app/views/shared/_no_password.html.haml](app/views/shared/_no_password.html.haml): ``` .no-password-message.alert.alert-warning.hidden-xs You won't be able to pull or push project code via #{gitlab_config.protocol.upcase} until you #{link_to 'set a password', edit_profile_password_path} on your account .pull-right = link_to "Don't show again", profile_path(user: {hide_no_password: true}), method: :put | = link_to 'Remind later', '#', class: 'hide-no-password-message' .no-password-message.alert.alert-warning.hidden-xs You won't be able to pull or push project code via #{gitlab_config.protocol.upcase} until you #{link_to 'set a password', edit_profile_password_path} on your account .pull-right = link_to "Don't show again", profile_path(user: {hide_no_password: true}), method: :put | = link_to 'Remind later', '#', class: 'hide-no-password-message' .no-password-message.alert.alert-warning.hidden-xs You won't be able to pull or push project code via #{gitlab_config.protocol.upcase} until you #{link_to 'set a password', edit_profile_password_path} on your account .pull-right = link_to "Don't show again", profile_path(user: {hide_no_password: true}), method: :put | = link_to 'Remind later', '#', class: 'hide-no-password-message' ``` ## Why was this MR needed? More alert-warning stripes are coming via the CI usage limits implementation in EE (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/965), and these layout margins and colors were becoming messy. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~ - [ ] ~~API support added~~ - Tests - [ ] ~~Added for this feature/bug~~ - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #25743 See merge request !8151
-
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Make autocomplete request performant ## What does this MR do? Restricts the `autocomplete_sources`action to returning the `json`of one specific `at` type at a time. Makes sure all commands start by immediately showing the `loading` dropdown. If the `loading` dropdown is active, we will request and load in the data for that specific `at` type. We manually trigger the filter again. This time, if `loading` dropdown is not active, initiate default filter behaviour and use the correct data template. Also fixes an issue where `setup` was called multiple times by only setting up and destroying atwho on a focused/blured input. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? `autocomplete_sources` was requested on page load and is large. ## Screenshots (if relevant) 3 requests for 3 different first-time references. ![Screen_Shot_2016-10-14_at_14.43.12](/uploads/0b04eab0d0bf3638d6d6e431036b8089/Screen_Shot_2016-10-14_at_14.43.12.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #22802 Closes #18435 See merge request !6856
-
Mike Greiling authored
-
Mike Greiling authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Additional rounded label fixes ## What does this MR do? fixes some UI bugs for the change to rounded labels ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? - ## Why was this MR needed? / Screenshots (if relevant) before: ![image](/uploads/ce359bb021fee324156f050b3f848c2e/image.png) after: ![image](/uploads/a5f0d536db3efdce4ff994deb0d73081/image.png) these now have full rounded border-radius as well :) ![image](/uploads/d331eae2c32dd043766b4148f9ad88e9/image.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? - See merge request !8136
-