- 14 Oct, 2016 30 commits
-
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Grapify boards API ## What does this MR do? Add the Grape-DSL to the boards API. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Related to #22928 See merge request !6876
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Updated issuable dropdown titles ## What does this MR do? The dropdowns in the issuable form still had the filter dropdown titles, this fixes that by giving them their own titles. Closes #23337 See merge request !6882
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Fix grafana_configuration.md move link See merge request !6871
-
Kamil Trzciński authored
Show deployed time ago Closes #21652 cc @ayufan See merge request !6676
-
Douwe Maan authored
Reassign secret token when regenerating one ## What does this MR do? This is an attempt to fix intermittent errors in out test suite. ```text Failures: 1) Gitlab::Shell memoized secret_token creates and links the secret token file Failure/Error: expect(File.read(secret_file).chomp).to eq(secret_token) expected: "690f959e206ab91acc54e1c605c7ff90" got: "cccb4e8df9360600271e61114d4e6e68" (compared using ==) # ./spec/lib/gitlab/backend/shell_spec.rb:47:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>' ``` It appears that `spec/lib/gitlab/backend/shell_spec.rb` tries to change the file that stores secret token, but `Gitlab::Shell` memoizes `@secret_token` on class level, so when it was already created by other tests (`spec/requests/api/internal_spec.rb` in this case), memoized token is not reassigned even if it was generated again with `ensure_secret_token!`. See merge request !6844
-
Robert Schilling authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Grapify todos API ## What does this MR do? Add the Grape-DSL to the todos API. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Related to #22928 See merge request !6875
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Extract project#update_merge_requests to its own worker from GitPushService See merge request !6767
-
Phil Hughes authored
Closes #23337
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Resolve "Fix missing Glossary link" ## What does this MR do? Fixes broken links in University. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #23332 See merge request !6880
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Grapify system hooks API ## What does this MR do? Add the Grape-DSL to the system-hook API. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Related to #22928 See merge request !6861
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Add more info on the new CI permissions model From discussion in issue https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22484 See merge request !6843
-
Luke Bennett authored
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-
Luke Bennett authored
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-
Luke Bennett authored
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-
Sean Packham authored
-
Sean Packham authored
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Refactor merge requests revisions docs See merge request !6878
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
- A system note now appears on every push - Replace dashes with underscores in images [ci skip]
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
-
Robert Schilling authored
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Link to review apps example from docs Put a link in the example project of the Review Apps in dynamic environments and to the list of CI examples. See merge request !6873
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
[ci skip]
-
- 13 Oct, 2016 10 commits
-
-
Ben Bodenmiller authored
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Do not run before_script, artifacts, cache in trigger_docs job Fixes See merge request !6866
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Replace unique keyframes mixin with specific keyframe animation names ## What does this MR do? Replaces `unique-keyframes` mixin with `include-keyframes` mixin ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Shouldn't be
👍🏻 ## Why was this MR needed? Some users had GitLab hosted in a distributed environment that makes `unique-keyframes` a non-viable implementation. The randomized animation names from `unique-keyframes` was not being picked up by the different servers which resulted in 404 errors. ## Screenshots (if relevant) None ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #22629 See merge request !6603 -
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
-
Robert Schilling authored
-
Robert Speicher authored
CE to EE merge check rake task ## What does this MR do? This merge request adds a Rake task that checks whether the current branch can be merged cleanly to EE/master. If not, it checks if a `<ce_branch>-ee` branch exists in EE, tries to merge it to EE/master and then tries to merge `ce_branch` to EE/master. If the result of the check is that the current branch cannot be merged cleanly to EE/master, the job will fail, display troubleshooting steps, and a warning will be shown in the merge request. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Probably the steps I used to do the various checks, and also the steps I suggest to create an EE-specific branch. ## Why was this MR needed? The goal is to catch as early as possible the possible conflicts a CE MR will cause when CE/master will be merged to EE/master. This way, the developer is warned that he/she should open a MR against EE before or as soon as the CE is merged. In the end, this should lower the work of the CE->EE merger. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Part of gitlab-org/gitlab-ee#715, hopefully. See merge request !6746
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Handle case where deployment ref no longer exists ## What does this MR do? In 8.9, we didn't create keep-around refs for deployments. So it's possible that someone created a deployment (say, for testing), and then deleted the branch and all other references to that commit. That commit could then get GCed, and trying to view MRs on 8.11+ will show a 500. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22655#note_16575020 for more details. ## Why was this MR needed? If someone created a deployment on 8.9, then deleted all references to the commit for that deployment, we will throw an exception when checking if the deployment includes a commit. Closes #22655. See merge request !6855
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Sort API mounts ## What does this MR do? Sort the API mounts. ## Why was this MR needed? The API mounts are unsorted. See merge request !6831
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Convert unicode emojis to images. ## Why was this MR needed? For better cross platform interoperability with emojis. Closes #22591 See merge request !6829
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Also add a safeguard for non-CI env. Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-