An error occurred fetching the project authors.
  1. 05 Jul, 2017 2 commits
  2. 19 Jun, 2017 2 commits
  3. 16 Jun, 2017 1 commit
  4. 09 Mar, 2017 1 commit
  5. 18 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  6. 06 Dec, 2016 1 commit
  7. 09 Nov, 2016 1 commit
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      Accounting: fix a wrong constraint when checking accounting periods · f61b748d
      Jérome Perrin authored
      When we have a transaction with both sections from the same group, we
      only check accounting periods for the sides which actually define
      accounting. When there was a source or destination organiation defined
      at the delivery level it was acquired on the lines and in that check we
      wrongly considered this to be defining accounting.
      f61b748d
  8. 30 Sep, 2016 1 commit
  9. 27 Sep, 2016 1 commit
  10. 23 Jun, 2016 1 commit
  11. 22 Jun, 2016 1 commit
  12. 28 Jan, 2016 1 commit
  13. 21 Oct, 2015 1 commit
  14. 16 Jul, 2015 1 commit
  15. 10 Mar, 2015 1 commit
  16. 10 Feb, 2015 2 commits
  17. 04 Sep, 2014 1 commit
  18. 22 Aug, 2014 1 commit
  19. 29 Jul, 2014 1 commit
  20. 30 Jan, 2014 1 commit
  21. 10 Dec, 2012 2 commits
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      testAccounting: fix a random failure · d9fa3351
      Jérome Perrin authored
      d9fa3351
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      Extend grouping_reference with grouping_date · f3bebea3
      Jérome Perrin authored
      The grouping date is a property representing the date when this grouping is
      effective.
      In erp5_accounting, when setting a grouping reference, the grouping date will
      be set to the latest date of grouped line. When running reports with
      "omit_grouping_reference", lines that are grouped after the end date of the
      report will still be displayed.
      
      SQLCatalog structure changed, and can be updated with:
      alter table catalog add column grouping_date datetime after grouping_reference;
      
      You might also want to set a grouping date on movements with a grouping
      reference in the migration.
      f3bebea3
  22. 11 May, 2012 1 commit
  23. 20 Apr, 2012 1 commit
  24. 29 Mar, 2012 1 commit
    • Rafael Monnerat's avatar
      Move solvers, rules and code from erp5_simulation_test to erp5_configurator_standard_*_template · 399caf39
      Rafael Monnerat authored
       - Solvers were moved to erp5_configurator_standard_solver
       - trade related code and rules to  erp5_configurator_standard_trade_template
       - accounting related code and rules to  erp5_configurator_standard_accounting_template
       - invoicing related code and rules to  erp5_configurator_standard_invoicing_template
      
      Code were moved and splited to several diferent business templates. The rules
      and related code should be used only as template.
      399caf39
  25. 31 Aug, 2011 1 commit
  26. 17 Feb, 2011 1 commit
  27. 16 Feb, 2011 1 commit
  28. 14 Feb, 2011 1 commit
    • Sebastien Robin's avatar
      - fix reindexing of Balance Transaction. There was following · e2207068
      Sebastien Robin authored
        problem :
        1 - balance transaction A is indexed at date t1, a quantity
            diff of 1 is found on line a, so -1 is inserted into stock
        2 - for some reasons, a movement with date t2 with t2 < t1
            was not well indexed, after a reindex it is now correctly
            indexed
        3 - we reindex the balance transaction, thanks to to 2) there
            no diff any more, but due to bug the diff of -1 is not
            removed from the stock.
      - add test for validating the fix of this bug
      
      git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@43307 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
      e2207068
  29. 11 Jan, 2011 2 commits
  30. 06 Oct, 2010 1 commit
  31. 17 Sep, 2010 1 commit
  32. 16 Sep, 2010 1 commit
  33. 03 Sep, 2010 1 commit
  34. 26 Aug, 2010 1 commit
    • Julien Muchembled's avatar
      Reorganize new/old simulation-related objects in BT to have proper dependencies · 1e1646ff
      Julien Muchembled authored
      - split erp5_legacy into erp5_simulation_legacy (for generic objects) and
        erp5_{trade,accounting,invoicing}_simulation_legacy
      - reverse dependency of erp5_simulation (which may not even need erp5_base)
      - move obsolete portal type definitions (including some from erp5_base) to
        appropriate BT
      - update BT list of unit tests
      
      A unit test testing Trade now needs:
      - new simulation: erp5_base, erp5_pdm, erp5_simulation, erp5_trade,
        erp5_simulation_test (in this order)
      - legacy: erp5_base, erp5_pdm, erp5_simulation, erp5_simulation_legacy,
        erp5_trade, erp5_trade_legacy (in this order)
      
      git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/sandbox/amount_generator@38036 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
      1e1646ff
  35. 12 Aug, 2010 1 commit