Vincent has noticed [1] that there is something unusual with the memmap
allocations going on on his platform

: I noticed this because on my ARM64 platform, with 1 GiB of memory the
: first [and only] section is allocated from the zeroing path while with
: 2 GiB of memory the first 1 GiB section is allocated from the
: non-zeroing path.

The underlying problem is that although sparse_buffer_init allocates
enough memory for all sections on the node sparse_buffer_alloc is not
able to consume them due to mismatch in the expected allocation
alignement.  While sparse_buffer_init preallocation uses the PAGE_SIZE
alignment the real memmap has to be aligned to section_map_size() this
results in a wasted initial chunk of the preallocated memmap and
unnecessary fallback allocation for a section.

While we are at it also change __populate_section_memmap to align to the
requested size because at least VMEMMAP has constrains to have memmap
properly aligned.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191030131122.8256-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak layout, per David]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191119092642.31799-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Fixes: 35fd1eb1 ("mm/sparse: abstract sparse buffer allocations")
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reported-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
Debugged-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>