Vegard Nossum reported that perf fuzzing generates a NULL
pointer dereference crash:

> Digging a bit deeper into this, it seems the event itself is getting
> created by perf_event_open() and it gets added to the pmu_event_list
> through:
>
> perf_event_open()
>  - perf_event_alloc()
>     - account_event()
>        - account_pmu_sb_event()
>           - attach_sb_event()
>
> so at this point the event is being attached but its ->ctx is still
> NULL. It seems like ->ctx is set just a bit later in
> perf_event_open(), though.
>
> But before that, __schedule() comes along and creates a stack trace
> similar to the one above:
>
> __schedule()
>  - __perf_event_task_sched_out()
>    - perf_iterate_sb()
>      - perf_iterate_sb_cpu()
>         - event_filter_match()
>           - perf_cgroup_match()
>             - __get_cpu_context()
>               - (dereference ctx which is NULL)
>
> So I guess the question is... should the event be attached (= put on
> the list) before ->ctx gets set? Or should the cgroup code check for a
> NULL ->ctx?

The latter seems like the simplest solution. Moving the list-add later
creates a bit of a mess.
Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: f2fb6bef ("perf/core: Optimize side-band event delivery")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160804123724.GN6862@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>