-
Hans J. Schultz authored
As only the hardware access functions up til and including mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_mac_read() called under the interrupt handler need to take the chip lock, we release the chip lock after this call. The follow up code that handles the violations can run without the chip lock held. In further patches, the violation handler function will even be incompatible with having the chip lock held. This due to an AB/BA ordering inversion with rtnl_lock(). Signed-off-by: Hans J. Schultz <netdev@kapio-technology.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
0c34aff5