As per the existing implementation; implement the new one using
smp_mb().

AFAICT the s390 compare-and-swap does imply a barrier, however there
are some immediate ops that seem to be singly-copy atomic and do not
imply a barrier. One such is the "ni" op (which would be
and-immediate) which is used for the constant clear_bit
implementation. Therefore s390 needs full barriers for the
{before,after} atomic ops.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kme5dz5hcobpnufnnkh1ech2@git.kernel.org
Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux390@de.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>