In Kbuild, two different rules must not write to the same file, but
it happens when compiling rust source files.

For example, set CONFIG_SAMPLE_RUST_MINIMAL=m and run the following:

  $ make -j$(nproc) samples/rust/rust_minimal.o samples/rust/rust_minimal.rsi \
                    samples/rust/rust_minimal.s samples/rust/rust_minimal.ll
    [snip]
    RUSTC [M] samples/rust/rust_minimal.o
    RUSTC [M] samples/rust/rust_minimal.rsi
    RUSTC [M] samples/rust/rust_minimal.s
    RUSTC [M] samples/rust/rust_minimal.ll
  mv: cannot stat 'samples/rust/rust_minimal.d': No such file or directory
  make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:334: samples/rust/rust_minimal.ll] Error 1
  make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
  mv: cannot stat 'samples/rust/rust_minimal.d': No such file or directory
  make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:309: samples/rust/rust_minimal.o] Error 1
  mv: cannot stat 'samples/rust/rust_minimal.d': No such file or directory
  make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:326: samples/rust/rust_minimal.s] Error 1
  make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:504: samples/rust] Error 2
  make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:504: samples] Error 2
  make: *** [Makefile:2008: .] Error 2

The reason for the error is that 4 threads running in parallel renames
the same file, samples/rust/rust_minimal.d.

This does not happen when compiling C or assembly files because
-Wp,-MMD,$(depfile) explicitly specifies the dependency filepath.
$(depfile) is a unique path for each target.

Currently, rustc is only given --out-dir and --emit=<list-of-types>
So, all the rust build rules output the dep-info into the default
<CRATE_NAME>.d, which causes the path conflict.

Fortunately, the --emit option is able to specify the output path
individually, with the form --emit=<type>=<path>.

Add --emit=dep-info=$(depfile) to the common part. Also, remove the
redundant --out-dir because the output path is specified for each type.

The code gets much cleaner because we do not need to rename *.d files.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>