-
Jeff Layton authored
Currently, both destroy_revoked_delegation and revoke_delegation manipulate the cl_revoked list without any locking aside from the client_mutex. Ensure that the clp->cl_lock is held when manipulating it, except for the list walking in destroy_client. At that point, the client should no longer be in use, and so it should be safe to walk the list without any locking. That also means that we don't need to do the list_splice_init there either. Also, the fact that revoke_delegation deletes dl_recall_lru list_head without any locking makes it difficult to know whether it's doing so safely in all cases. Move the list_del_init calls into the callers, and add a WARN_ON in the event that t's passed a delegation that has a non-empty list_head. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2d4a532d