Currently, we check we can send a pulse prior to disabling the
heartbeat to verify that we can change the heartbeat, but since we may
re-evaluate execution upon changing the heartbeat interval we need another
pulse afterwards to refresh execution.

v2: Tvrtko asked if we could reduce the double pulse to a single, which
opened up a discussion of how we should handle the pulse-error after
attempting to change the property, and the desire to serialise
adjustment of the property with its validating pulse, and unwind upon
failure.

Fixes: 9a40bddd ("drm/i915/gt: Expose heartbeat interval via sysfs")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.7+
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200928221510.26044-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 3dd66a94)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>