This patch introduce a new globs attribute to define the subclass of the
glock lockref spinlock. This avoid the following lockdep warning, which
occurs when we lock an inode lock while an iopen lock is held:

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.10.0-rc3+ #4990 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1/12 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff9067d45672d8 (&gl->gl_lockref.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lockref_get+0x9/0x20

but task is already holding lock:
ffff9067da308588 (&gl->gl_lockref.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: delete_work_func+0x164/0x260

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock);
  lock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

3 locks held by kworker/0:1/12:
 #0: ffff9067c1bfdd38 ((wq_completion)delete_workqueue){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1b7/0x540
 #1: ffffac594006be70 ((work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_delete)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1b7/0x540
 #2: ffff9067da308588 (&gl->gl_lockref.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: delete_work_func+0x164/0x260

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ #4990
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Workqueue: delete_workqueue delete_work_func
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
 __lock_acquire.cold+0x19e/0x2e3
 lock_acquire+0x150/0x410
 ? lockref_get+0x9/0x20
 _raw_spin_lock+0x27/0x40
 ? lockref_get+0x9/0x20
 lockref_get+0x9/0x20
 delete_work_func+0x188/0x260
 process_one_work+0x237/0x540
 worker_thread+0x4d/0x3b0
 ? process_one_work+0x540/0x540
 kthread+0x127/0x140
 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
Suggested-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>