Currently, if a slave's name change, we just pass it by. However, if the
slave is a current primary_slave, then we end up with using a slave, whose
name != params.primary, for primary_slave. And vice-versa, if we don't have
a primary_slave but have params.primary set - we will not detected a new
primary_slave.

Fix this by catching the NETDEV_CHANGENAME event and setting primary_slave
accordingly. Also, if the primary_slave was changed, issue a reselection of
the active slave, cause the priorities have changed.
Reported-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
CC: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>