-
Mark Rutland authored
Currently the arm64_cpu_capabilities structure for ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING open-codes the same CPU field definitions as the arm64_cpu_capabilities structure for ARM64_HAS_GIC_CPUIF_SYSREGS, so that can_use_gic_priorities() can use has_useable_gicv3_cpuif(). This duplication isn't ideal for the legibility of the code, and sets a bad example for any ARM64_HAS_GIC_* definitions added by subsequent patches. Instead, have ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING check for the ARM64_HAS_GIC_CPUIF_SYSREGS cpucap, and add a comment explaining why this is safe. Subsequent patches will use the same pattern where one cpucap depends upon another. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130145429.903791-4-mark.rutland@arm.comSigned-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
4b43f1cd