-
Neal Cardwell authored
When tcp_shifted_skb() shifts bytes from the skb that is currently pointed to by 'highest_sack' then the increment of TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq implicitly advances tcp_highest_sack_seq(). This implicit advancement, combined with the recent fix to pass the correct SACKed range into tcp_sacktag_one(), caused tcp_sacktag_one() to think that the newly SACKed range was before the tcp_highest_sack_seq(), leading to a call to tcp_update_reordering() with a degree of reordering matching the size of the newly SACKed range (typically just 1 packet, which is a NOP, but potentially larger). This commit fixes this by simply calling tcp_sacktag_one() before the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq advancement that can advance our notion of the highest SACKed sequence. Correspondingly, we can simplify the code a little now that tcp_shifted_skb() should update the lost_cnt_hint in all cases where skb == tp->lost_skb_hint. Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
4c90d3b3