There are 3 synchronization issues with thermal zone suspend-resume
during system-wide transitions:

 1. The resume code runs in a PM notifier which is invoked after user
    space has been thawed, so it can run concurrently with user space
    which can trigger a thermal zone device removal.  If that happens,
    the thermal zone resume code may use a stale pointer to the next
    list element and crash, because it does not hold thermal_list_lock
    while walking thermal_tz_list.

 2. The thermal zone resume code calls thermal_zone_device_init()
    outside the zone lock, so user space or an update triggered by
    the platform firmware may see an inconsistent state of a
    thermal zone leading to unexpected behavior.

 3. Clearing the in_suspend global variable in thermal_pm_notify()
    allows __thermal_zone_device_update() to continue for all thermal
    zones and it may as well run before the thermal_tz_list walk (or
    at any point during the list walk for that matter) and attempt to
    operate on a thermal zone that has not been resumed yet.  It may
    also race destructively with thermal_zone_device_init().

To address these issues, add thermal_list_lock locking to
thermal_pm_notify(), especially arount the thermal_tz_list,
make it call thermal_zone_device_init() back-to-back with
__thermal_zone_device_update() under the zone lock and replace
in_suspend with per-zone bool "suspend" indicators set and unset
under the given zone's lock.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20231218162348.69101-1-bo.ye@mediatek.com/Reported-by: Bo Ye <bo.ye@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>