-
Andi Shyti authored
In the cifs_reopen_file function, if the following statement is asserted: (tcon->unix_ext && cap_unix(tcon->ses) && (CIFS_UNIX_POSIX_PATH_OPS_CAP & (tcon->fsUnixInfo.Capability))) and we succeed to open with cifs_posix_open, the function jumps to the label reopen_success and checks for oparms.reconnect which is not initialized. This issue has been reported by scan.coverity.com Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
fe090e4e