A few places we intermix btrfs_inode_lock with a inode_unlock, and some
places we just use inode_lock/inode_unlock instead of btrfs_inode_lock.

None of these places are using this incorrectly, but as we adjust some
of these callers it would be nice to keep everything consistent, so
convert everybody to use btrfs_inode_lock/btrfs_inode_unlock.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>