-
David Hildenbrand authored
The increment might not be atomic and we're not holding the timekeeper_lock. Therefore we might lose an update to count, resulting in VDSO being trapped in a loop. As other archs also simply update the values and count doesn't seem to have an impact on reloading of these values in VDSO code, let's just remove the update of tb_update_count. Suggested-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
67f03de5