-
Oleg Nesterov authored
The error hanling and ret-from-loop look confusing and inconsistent. - "retval >= 0" simply returns - "!bprm->file" returns too but with read_unlock() because binfmt_lock was already re-acquired - "retval != -ENOEXEC || bprm->mm == NULL" does "break" and relies on the same check after the main loop Consolidate these checks into a single if/return statement. need_retry still checks "retval == -ENOEXEC", but this and -ENOENT before the main loop are not needed. This is only for pathological and impossible list_empty(&formats) case. It is not clear why do we check "bprm->mm == NULL", probably this should be removed. Signed-off-by:
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by:
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> Cc: Zach Levis <zml@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
6b3c538f