-
Theodore Ts'o authored
The function jbd2_journal_extend() takes as its argument the number of new credits to be added to the handle. We weren't taking into account the currently unused handle credits; worse, we would try to extend the handle by N credits when it had N credits available. In the case where jbd2_journal_extend() fails because the transaction is too large, when jbd2_journal_restart() gets called, the N credits owned by the handle gets returned to the transaction, and the transaction commit is asynchronously requested, and then start_this_handle() will be able to successfully attach the handle to the current transaction since the required credits are now available. This is mostly harmless, but since ext4_ext_truncate_extend_restart() returns EAGAIN, the truncate machinery will once again try to call ext4_ext_truncate_extend_restart(), which will do the above sequence over and over again until the transaction has committed. This was found while I was debugging a lockup in caused by running xfstests generic/074 in the data=journal case. I'm still not sure why we ended up looping forever, which suggests there may still be another bug hiding in the transaction accounting machinery, but this commit prevents us from looping in the first place. Signed-off-by:
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
7b808191