When receiving a CAN frame the current code logic does not consider
concurrently receiving processes which do not show up in real world
usage.

Ziyang Xuan writes:

The following syz problem is one of the scenarios. so->rx.len is
changed by isotp_rcv_ff() during isotp_rcv_cf(), so->rx.len equals
0 before alloc_skb() and equals 4096 after alloc_skb(). That will
trigger skb_over_panic() in skb_put().

=======================================================
CPU: 1 PID: 19 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8-syzkaller #0
RIP: 0010:skb_panic+0x16c/0x16e net/core/skbuff.c:113
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 skb_over_panic net/core/skbuff.c:118 [inline]
 skb_put.cold+0x24/0x24 net/core/skbuff.c:1990
 isotp_rcv_cf net/can/isotp.c:570 [inline]
 isotp_rcv+0xa38/0x1e30 net/can/isotp.c:668
 deliver net/can/af_can.c:574 [inline]
 can_rcv_filter+0x445/0x8d0 net/can/af_can.c:635
 can_receive+0x31d/0x580 net/can/af_can.c:665
 can_rcv+0x120/0x1c0 net/can/af_can.c:696
 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x114/0x180 net/core/dev.c:5465
 __netif_receive_skb+0x24/0x1b0 net/core/dev.c:5579

Therefore we make sure the state changes and data structures stay
consistent at CAN frame reception time by adding a spin_lock in
isotp_rcv(). This fixes the issue reported by syzkaller but does not
affect real world operation.

Fixes: e057dd3f ("can: add ISO 15765-2:2016 transport protocol")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/d7e69278-d741-c706-65e1-e87623d9a8e8@huawei.com/T/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220208200026.13783-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+4c63f36709a642f801c5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>