-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] The following simple workload from fsstress can lead to qgroup reserved data space leak: 0/0: creat f0 x:0 0 0 0/0: creat add id=0,parent=-1 0/1: write f0[259 1 0 0 0 0] [600030,27288] 0 0/4: dwrite - xfsctl(XFS_IOC_DIOINFO) f0[259 1 0 0 64 627318] return 25, fallback to stat() 0/4: dwrite f0[259 1 0 0 64 627318] [610304,106496] 0 This would cause btrfs qgroup to leak 20480 bytes for data reserved space. If btrfs qgroup limit is enabled, such leak can lead to unexpected early EDQUOT and unusable space. [CAUSE] When doing direct IO, kernel will try to writeback existing buffered page cache, then invalidate them: generic_file_direct_write() |- filemap_write_and_wait_range(); |- invalidate_inode_pages2_range(); However for btrfs, the bi_end_io hook doesn't finish all its heavy work right after bio ends. In fact, it delays its work further: submit_extent_page(end_io_func=end_bio_extent_writepage); end_bio_extent_writepage() |- btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered() |- btrfs_init_work(finish_ordered_fn); <<< Work queue execution >>> finish_ordered_fn() |- btrfs_finish_ordered_io(); |- Clear qgroup bits This means, when filemap_write_and_wait_range() returns, btrfs_finish_ordered_io() is not guaranteed to be executed, thus the qgroup bits for related range are not cleared. Now into how the leak happens, this will only focus on the overlapping part of buffered and direct IO part. 1. After buffered write The inode had the following range with QGROUP_RESERVED bit: 596 616K |///////////////| Qgroup reserved data space: 20K 2. Writeback part for range [596K, 616K) Write back finished, but btrfs_finish_ordered_io() not get called yet. So we still have: 596K 616K |///////////////| Qgroup reserved data space: 20K 3. Pages for range [596K, 616K) get released This will clear all qgroup bits, but don't update the reserved data space. So we have: 596K 616K | | Qgroup reserved data space: 20K That number doesn't match the qgroup bit range anymore. 4. Dio prepare space for range [596K, 700K) Qgroup reserved data space for that range, we got: 596K 616K 700K |///////////////|///////////////////////| Qgroup reserved data space: 20K + 104K = 124K 5. btrfs_finish_ordered_range() gets executed for range [596K, 616K) Qgroup free reserved space for that range, we got: 596K 616K 700K | |///////////////////////| We need to free that range of reserved space. Qgroup reserved data space: 124K - 20K = 104K 6. btrfs_finish_ordered_range() gets executed for range [596K, 700K) However qgroup bit for range [596K, 616K) is already cleared in previous step, so we only free 84K for qgroup reserved space. 596K 616K 700K | | | We need to free that range of reserved space. Qgroup reserved data space: 104K - 84K = 20K Now there is no way to release that 20K unless disabling qgroup or unmounting the fs. [FIX] This patch will change the timing of btrfs_qgroup_release/free_data() call. Here it uses buffered COW write as an example. The new timing | The old timing ----------------------------------------+--------------------------------------- btrfs_buffered_write() | btrfs_buffered_write() |- btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() | |- btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() | btrfs_run_delalloc_range() | btrfs_run_delalloc_range() |- btrfs_add_ordered_extent() | |- btrfs_qgroup_release_data() | The reserved is passed into | btrfs_ordered_extent structure | | btrfs_finish_ordered_io() | btrfs_finish_ordered_io() |- The reserved space is passed to | |- btrfs_qgroup_release_data() btrfs_qgroup_record | The resereved space is passed | to btrfs_qgroup_recrod | btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() | btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() |- btrfs_qgroup_free_refroot() | |- btrfs_qgroup_free_refroot() The point of such change is to ensure, when ordered extents are submitted, the qgroup reserved space is already released, to keep the timing aligned with file_write_and_wait_range(). So that qgroup data reserved space is all bound to btrfs_ordered_extent and solve the timing mismatch. Fixes: f695fdce ("btrfs: qgroup: Introduce functions to release/free qgroup reserve data space") Suggested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7dbeaad0